The COMET Sleep Research Platform

Deborah A Nichols, Steven DeSalvo, Richard A Miller, Darrell Jónsson, Kara S Griffin, Pamela R Hyde, James K Walsh, Clete A Kushida, Deborah A Nichols, Steven DeSalvo, Richard A Miller, Darrell Jónsson, Kara S Griffin, Pamela R Hyde, James K Walsh, Clete A Kushida

Abstract

Introduction: The Comparative Outcomes Management with Electronic Data Technology (COMET) platform is extensible and designed for facilitating multicenter electronic clinical research.

Background: Our research goals were the following: (1) to conduct a comparative effectiveness trial (CET) for two obstructive sleep apnea treatments-positive airway pressure versus oral appliance therapy; and (2) to establish a new electronic network infrastructure that would support this study and other clinical research studies.

Discussion: The COMET platform was created to satisfy the needs of CET with a focus on creating a platform that provides comprehensive toolsets, multisite collaboration, and end-to-end data management. The platform also provides medical researchers the ability to visualize and interpret data using business intelligence (BI) tools.

Conclusion: COMET is a research platform that is scalable and extensible, and which, in a future version, can accommodate big data sets and enable efficient and effective research across multiple studies and medical specialties. The COMET platform components were designed for an eventual move to a cloud computing infrastructure that enhances sustainability, overall cost effectiveness, and return on investment.

Keywords: COMET; business intelligence; cloud computing; comparative effectiveness research; obstructive sleep apnea; research platform.

Figures

Figure 7.
Figure 7.
CET Content Collection: COMET Data Pipeline Subsystem
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
COMET Platform Layers
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
CET Requirements for the Application Software Layer of the COMET Platform
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Data Processing: COMET Data Pipeline Subsystem
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Power Pivot Dashboard: COMET Collaboration and Presentation Subsystem
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Power Pivot Report: COMET Collaboration and Presentation Subsystem
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Future Cloud Computing Service Model
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/4371444/bin/egems1059f8.jpg

References

    1. Hamilton Lopez M, Holve E, Sarkar IN, Segal C. Building the informatics infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research (CER): a review of the literature. Med Care. 2012 Jul;50(Suppl):S38–48.
    1. Luhn HP. A business intelligence system. IBM Journal of Research and Development. 1958;2(4):314–19.
    1. Codd EF. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Communications of the ACM. 1970 Jun;13(6):377–87.
    1. Kimball R, Ross M, Thornthwaite W, Mundy J, Becker B. The data warehouse lifecycle toolkit. 2nd ed. Wiley; 2008.
    1. Mettler T, Vimarlund V. Understanding business intelligence in the context of healthcare. Health Informatics J. 2009 Sep;15(3):254–64.
    1. The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Jul 24, 2011. Retrieved.
    1. Schweitzer EJ. Reconciliation of the cloud computing model with US federal electronic health record regulations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Mar-Apr;19(2):161–5.
    1. Beck K, et al. Manifesto for agile software development. Agile Alliance; 2001.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner