Brief Report: Improvement in Metabolic Health Parameters at Week 48 After Switching From a Tenofovir Alafenamide-Based 3- or 4-Drug Regimen to the 2-Drug Regimen of Dolutegravir/Lamivudine: The TANGO Study

Jean van Wyk, Mounir Ait-Khaled, Jesus Santos, Stefan Scholten, Michael Wohlfeiler, Faïza Ajana, Bryn Jones, Maria-Claudia Nascimento, Allan R Tenorio, Don E Smith, Jonathan Wright, Brian Wynne, Jean van Wyk, Mounir Ait-Khaled, Jesus Santos, Stefan Scholten, Michael Wohlfeiler, Faïza Ajana, Bryn Jones, Maria-Claudia Nascimento, Allan R Tenorio, Don E Smith, Jonathan Wright, Brian Wynne

Abstract

Background: In TANGO, switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine was noninferior at 48 weeks to continuing 3-/4-drug tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens in virologically suppressed individuals with HIV-1. Antiretroviral agents have been associated with weight gain and metabolic complications.

Setting: One hundred thirty-four centers; 10 countries.

Methods: We assessed weight; fasting lipids, glucose, and insulin; and prevalence of insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome at baseline and week 48 in TANGO participant subgroups by boosting agent use in baseline regimens (boosted and unboosted).

Results: In each treatment group, 74% of participants used boosted regimens at baseline. In boosted and unboosted subgroups, weight and fasting glucose changes at week 48 were small and similar between treatment groups. Overall and in the boosted subgroup, greater decreases from baseline were observed with dolutegravir/lamivudine in fasting total cholesterol (P < 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P < 0.001), triglycerides (P < 0.001), total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (overall, P = 0.017; boosted, P = 0.007), and insulin (boosted, P = 0.005). Prevalence of HOMA-IR ≥2 was significantly lower at week 48 with dolutegravir/lamivudine overall [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.40 to 0.87; P = 0.008] and in the boosted subgroup [aOR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.88; P = 0.012] but not in the unboosted subgroup [aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.58; P = 0.396]. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome at week 48 was low and consistent between treatment groups overall, with differences trending to favor dolutegravir/lamivudine in the unboosted subgroup [aOR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.09; P = 0.075].

Conclusion: Generally, switching from 3-/4-drug tenofovir alafenamide-based regimens to dolutegravir/lamivudine improved metabolic parameters, particularly when switching from boosted regimens. Because of smaller sample size in the unboosted subgroup, results warrant further investigation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03446573.

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Odds of (A) insulin resistance and (B) metabolic syndrome at week 48 with dolutegravir/lamivudine or tenofovir alafenamide–based regimen by boosting status of baseline antiretroviral regimen. Includes participants with no missing baseline covariate data and week 48 metabolic data. Participants with evidence of diabetes at baseline were excluded from HOMA-IR analysis. aOdds ratios and 95% CIs were calculated using a logistic regression model. Insulin resistance was adjusted for treatment regimen (2DR vs 3/4DR), baseline boosting status (boosted vs unboosted), race (black, other vs white), sex (female vs male), baseline BMI (continuous), baseline CD4+ cell count (continuous), age (continuous), baseline hypertension (yes vs no), baseline HOMA-IR (continuous), and treatment-by-baseline boosting status interaction. Metabolic syndrome was adjusted for treatment regimen (2DR vs 3/4DR), baseline boosting status (boosted vs unboosted), sex (female vs male), baseline hypertension (yes vs no), baseline triglycerides (borderline high, high, very high vs normal), baseline HDL-C (low, high vs normal), baseline HOMA-IR (2 to <3, 3 to <4, ≥4 vs <2), and treatment-by-baseline boosting status interaction. *P = 0.012. **P = 0.008.

References

    1. Achhra AC, Mocroft A, Reiss P, et al. . Short-term weight gain after antiretroviral therapy initiation and subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes: the D:A:D study. HIV Med. 2016;17:255–268.
    1. Nansseu JR, Bigna JJ, Kaze AD, et al. . Incidence and risk factors for prediabetes and diabetes mellitus among HIV-infected adults on antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology. 2018;29:431–441.
    1. Sax PE, Erlandson KM, Lake JE, et al. . Weight gain following initiation of antiretroviral therapy: risk factors in randomized comparative clinical trials. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:1379–1389.
    1. Schafer JJ, Sassa KN, O'Connor JR, et al. . Changes in body mass index and atherosclerotic disease risk score after switching from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to tenofovir alafenamide. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6:ofz414.
    1. Venter WDF, Moorhouse M, Sokhela S, et al. . Dolutegravir plus two different prodrugs of tenofovir to treat HIV. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:803–815.
    1. Ogbuagu O. Longer-Term Safety of F/TAF and F/TDF for HIV PrEP: DISCOVER Trial Week-96 Results [OL-08]. Presented at: Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections; 2020; Boston, MA, Virtual.
    1. Huhn GD, Shamblaw DJ, Baril JG, et al. . Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk profile of tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;7:ofz472.
    1. Mallon P, Brunet L, Hsu R, et al. . Weight gain before and after switch from TDF to TAF [OAB0604]. Presented at: International AIDS Conference; 2020; Oakland, CA, Virtual.
    1. Sax PE, Rockstroh JK, Luetkemeyer AF, et al. . Switching to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in virologically suppressed adults with HIV. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. [epub ahead of print].
    1. DeJesus E, Rockstroh JK, Henry K, et al. . Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus co-formulated emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;379:2429–2438.
    1. Dirajlal-Fargo S, Moser C, Brown TT, et al. . Changes in insulin resistance after initiation of raltegravir or protease inhibitors with tenofovir-emtricitabine: AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5260s. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016;3:ofw174.
    1. Lake JE, Stanley TL, Apovian CM, et al. . Practical review of recognition and management of obesity and lipohypertrophy in human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:1422–1429.
    1. Randell PA, Jackson AG, Boffito M, et al. . Effect of boosted fosamprenavir or lopinavir-based combinations on whole-body insulin sensitivity and lipids in treatment-naive HIV-type-1-positive men. Antivir Ther. 2010;15:1125–1132.
    1. Back D. 2-Drug regimens in HIV treatment: pharmacological considerations. Germs. 2017;7:113–114.
    1. Kelly SG, Nyaku AN, Taiwo BO. Two-drug treatment approaches in HIV: finally getting somewhere? Drugs. 2016;76:523–531.
    1. van Wyk J, Ajana F, Bisshop F, et al. . Efficacy and safety of switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine fixed-dose two-drug regimen versus continuing a tenofovir alafenamide-based three- or four-drug regimen for maintenance of virologic suppression in adults with HIV-1: phase 3, randomized, non-inferiority TANGO study. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:1920–1929.
    1. Kim B, Choi HY, Kim W, et al. . The cut-off values of surrogate measures for insulin resistance in the Korean population according to the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KOGES). PLoS One. 2018;13:e0206994.
    1. Lee CH, Shih AZ, Woo YC, et al. . Optimal cut-offs of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) to identify dysglycemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 15-year prospective study in Chinese. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0163424.
    1. Ghasemi A, Tohidi M, Derakhshan A, et al. . Cut-off points of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, beta-cell function, and fasting serum insulin to identify future type 2 diabetes: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Acta Diabetol. 2015;52:905–915.
    1. International Diabetes Federation. The IDF Consensus Worldwide Definition of the Metabolic Syndrome. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2006.
    1. Ciccullo A, Dusina A, Lassandro AP, et al. . No significant changes in body fat mass in virologically suppressed, HIV-positive patients switched to lamivudine–dolutegravir. AIDS. 2020;34:956–957.
    1. Taramasso L, Bonfanti P, Ricci E, et al. . Factors associated with weight gain in people treated with dolutegravir. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7:ofaa195.
    1. da Cunha J, Ferreira Maselli LM, Bassi Stern AC, et al. . Impact of antiretroviral therapy on lipid metabolism of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: old and new drugs. World J Virol. 2015;4:56–77.
    1. Kumar S, Samaras K. The impact of weight gain during HIV treatment on risk of pre-diabetes, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and mortality. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:705.
    1. Srinivasa S, Grinspoon SK. Metabolic and body composition effects of newer antiretrovirals in HIV-infected patients. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;170:R185–R202.
    1. Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration. Survival of HIV-positive patients starting antiretroviral therapy between 1996 and 2013: a collaborative analysis of cohort studies. Lancet HIV. 2017;4:e349–e356.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner