AVP-825 breath-powered intranasal delivery system containing 22 mg sumatriptan powder vs 100 mg oral sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraines (The COMPASS study): a comparative randomized clinical trial across multiple attacks

Stewart J Tepper, Roger K Cady, Stephen Silberstein, John Messina, Ramy A Mahmoud, Per G Djupesland, Paul Shin, Joao Siffert, Stewart J Tepper, Roger K Cady, Stephen Silberstein, John Messina, Ramy A Mahmoud, Per G Djupesland, Paul Shin, Joao Siffert

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of AVP-825, an investigational bi-directional breath-powered intranasal delivery system containing low-dose (22 mg) sumatriptan powder, vs 100 mg oral sumatriptan for acute treatment of migraine in a double-dummy, randomized comparative efficacy clinical trial allowing treatment across multiple migraine attacks.

Background: In phases 2 and 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trials, AVP-825 provided early and sustained relief of moderate or severe migraine headache in adults, with a low incidence of triptan-related adverse effects.

Methods: This was a randomized, active-comparator, double-dummy, cross-over, multi-attack study (COMPASS; NCT01667679) with two ≤12-week double-blind periods. Subjects experiencing 2-8 migraines/month in the past year were randomized 1:1 using computer-generated sequences to AVP-825 plus oral placebo tablet or an identical placebo delivery system plus 100 mg oral sumatriptan tablet for the first period; patients switched treatment for the second period in this controlled comparative design. Subjects treated ≤5 qualifying migraines per period within 1 hour of onset, even if pain was mild. The primary end-point was the mean value of the summed pain intensity differences through 30 minutes post-dose (SPID-30) using Headache Severity scores. Secondary outcomes included pain relief, pain freedom, pain reduction, consistency of response across multiple migraines, migraine-associated symptoms, and atypical sensations. Safety was also assessed.

Results: A total of 275 adults were randomized, 174 (63.3%) completed the study (ie, completed the second treatment period), and 185 (67.3%) treated at least one migraine in both periods (1531 migraines assessed). There was significantly greater reduction in migraine pain intensity with AVP-825 vs oral sumatriptan in the first 30 minutes post-dose (least squares mean SPID-30 = 10.80 vs 7.41, adjusted mean difference 3.39 [95% confidence interval 1.76, 5.01]; P < .001). At each time point measured between 15 and 90 minutes, significantly greater rates of pain relief and pain freedom occurred with AVP-825 treatment compared with oral sumatriptan. At 2 hours, rates of pain relief and pain freedom became comparable; rates of sustained pain relief and sustained pain freedom from 2 to 48 hours remained comparable. Nasal discomfort and abnormal taste were more common with AVP-825 vs oral sumatriptan (16% vs 1% and 26% vs 4%, respectively), but ∼90% were mild, leading to only one discontinuation. Atypical sensation rates were significantly lower with AVP-825 than with conventional higher dose 100 mg oral sumatriptan.

Conclusions: AVP-825 (containing 22 mg sumatriptan nasal powder) provided statistically significantly greater reduction of migraine pain intensity over the first 30 minutes following treatment, and greater rates of pain relief and pain freedom within 15 minutes, compared with 100 mg oral sumatriptan. Sustained pain relief and pain freedom through 24 and 48 hours was achieved in a similar percentage of attacks for both treatments, despite substantially lower total systemic drug exposure with AVP-825. Treatment was well tolerated, with statistically significantly fewer atypical sensations with AVP-825.

Keywords: AVP-825; OptiNose; comparative trial; intranasal; migraine; sumatriptan.

© 2015 The Authors. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain published. by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Headache Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
AVP-825: illustration of breath-powered delivery of sumatriptan powder. AVP-825 delivers low-dose sumatriptan powder to the upper posterior nasal regions beyond the narrow nasal valve, an area of richly vascular mucosa conducive to rapid drug absorption into the systemic circulation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Subject flow diagram. The full analysis set (FAS) included all subjects who received ≥1 dose of AVP-825 and ≥1 dose of oral sumatriptan, and recorded ≥1 post-treatment assessment for each treatment. Subjects completed treatment period 1 if they treated ≥1 qualifying migraine in treatment period 1 and went into treatment period 2. Subjects completed treatment period 2 if they treated 5 qualifying migraines or ≥1 qualifying migraine and completed the full 12 weeks in treatment period 2. Subjects were considered study completers if they completed treatment period 2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentage of migraine attacks achieving (A) pain relief and sustained pain relief and (B) pain freedom and sustained pain freedom (full analysis set). For pain relief, percentages are based on the total number of attacks treated when pain was moderate or severe. Pain relief = pain level reduced to none or mild. Sustained pain relief = pain level reduced to none or mild with no worsening of headache, second dose of study drug, or use of rescue medication over 24 hours or 48 hours after the attack. Pain freedom = pain level reduced to none (grade 0). Sustained pain freedom = grade 0 from 120 minutes to over 24 hours, and 48 hours after the initial dose with no recurrence of headache, or rescue medication/second dose up to 24 and 48 hours. Odds ratios (OR) are based on the fitted generalized estimating equations models.*P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001.

References

    1. Buse DC, Loder EW, Gorman JA, et al. Sex differences in the prevalence, symptoms, and associated features of migraine, probable migraine and other severe headache: Results of the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) Study. Headache. 2013;53:1278–1299.
    1. Johnston MM, Rapoport AM. Triptans for the management of migraine. Drugs. 2010;70:1505–1518.
    1. Derry CJ, Derry S, Moore RA. Sumatriptan (all routes of administration) for acute migraine attacks in adults – Overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(5) CD009108.
    1. Bigal M, Rapoport A, Aurora S, Sheftell F, Tepper S, Dahlof C. Satisfaction with current migraine therapy: Experience from 3 centers in US and Sweden. Headache. 2007;47:475–479.
    1. Djupesland PG, Messina JC, Mahmoud RA. Breath powered nasal delivery: A new route to rapid headache relief. Headache. 2013;53(Suppl. 2):72–84.
    1. Tepper SJ. Clinical implications for breath-powered powder sumatriptan intranasal treatment. Headache. 2013;53:1341–1349.
    1. Djupesland PG. Nasal drug delivery devices: Characteristics and performance in a clinical perspective – A review. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2013;3:42–62.
    1. Obaidi M, Offman E, Messina J, Carothers J, Djupesland PG, Mahmoud RA. Improved pharmacokinetics of sumatriptan with breath powered nasal delivery of sumatriptan powder. Headache. 2013;53:1323–1333.
    1. Cady RK, McAllister PJ, Spierings ELH, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of breath powered nasal delivery of sumatriptan powder (AVP-825) in the treatment of acute migraine (the TARGET study) Headache. 2015;55:88–100.
    1. Djupesland PG, Docekal P Czech Migraine Investigators Group. Intranasal sumatriptan powder delivered by a novel breath-actuated bi-directional device for the acute treatment of migraine: A randomised, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2010;30:933–942.
    1. Diener HC, Jansen JP, Reches A, et al. Efficacy, tolerability and safety of oral eletriptan and ergotamine plus caffeine (Cafergot) in the acute treatment of migraine: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison. Eur Neurol. 2002;47:99–107.
    1. Dowson AJ, Massiou H, Lainez JM, Cabarrocas X. Almotriptan is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for migraine pain: Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:453–461.
    1. Geraud G, Olesen J, Pfaffenrath V, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of zolmitriptan and sumatriptan: Issues in migraine trial design. Cephalalgia. 2000;20:30–38.
    1. Goadsby PJ, Ferrari MD, Olesen J, et al. Eletriptan in acute migraine: A double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison to sumatriptan. Eletriptan Steering Committee. Neurology. 2000;54:156–163.
    1. Goldstein J, Ryan R, Jiang K, et al. Crossover comparison of rizatriptan 5 mg and 10 mg vs sumatriptan 25 mg and 50 mg in migraine. Rizatriptan Protocol 046 Study Group. Headache. 1998;38:737–747.
    1. Pascual J, Vega P, Diener HC, Allen C, Vrijens F, Patel K. Comparison of rizatriptan 10 mg vs zolmitriptan 2.5 mg in the acute treatment of migraine. Rizatriptan-Zolmitriptan Study Group. Cephalalgia. 2000;20:455–461.
    1. Sandrini G, Farkkila M, Burgess G, Forster E, Haughie S, Eletriptan Steering C. Eletriptan vs sumatriptan: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple migraine attack study. Neurology. 2002;59:1210–1217.
    1. Bomhof M, Paz J, Legg N, Allen C, Vandormael K, Patel K. Comparison of rizatriptan 10 mg vs naratriptan 2.5 mg in migraine. Eur Neurol. 1999;42:173–179.
    1. Tfelt-Hansen P, Teall J, Rodriguez F, et al. Oral rizatriptan vs oral sumatriptan: A direct comparative study in the acute treatment of migraine. Rizatriptan 030 Study Group. Headache. 1998;38:748–755.
    1. Tfelt-Hansen P, Henry P, Mulder LJ, Scheldewaert RG, Schoenen J, Chazot G. The effectiveness of combined oral lysine acetylsalicylate and metoclopramide compared with oral sumatriptan for migraine. Lancet. 1995;346:923–926.
    1. Tfelt-Hansen P, Ryan RE., Jr Oral therapy for migraine: Comparisons between rizatriptan and sumatriptan. A review of four randomized, double-blind clinical trials. Neurology. 2000;55:S19–S24.
    1. Winner P, Landy S, Richardson M, Ames M. Early intervention in migraine with sumatriptan tablets 50 mg vs 100 mg: A pooled analysis of data from six clinical trials. Clin Ther. 2005;27:1785–1794.
    1. Tfelt-Hansen P, Pascual J, Ramadan N, et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of drugs in migraine: Third edition. A guide for investigators. Cephalalgia. 2012;32:6–38.
    1. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Ryan RE, Jr, Saper J, Silberstein S, Sheftell F. Efficacy and safety of acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine in alleviating migraine headache pain: Three double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Arch Neurol. 1998;55:210–217.
    1. Tfelt-Hansen P, McCarroll K, Lines C. Sum of pain intensity differences (SPID) in migraine trials. A comment based on four rizatriptan trials. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:664–666.
    1. Charlesworth BR, Dowson AJ, Purdy A, Becker WJ, Boes-Hansen S, Farkkila M. Speed of onset and efficacy of zolmitriptan nasal spray in the acute treatment of migraine: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study vs zolmitriptan tablet. CNS Drugs. 2003;17:653–667.
    1. Dahlof C. Sumatriptan nasal spray in the acute treatment of migraine: A review of clinical studies. Cephalalgia. 1999;19:769–778.
    1. Ivanusic JJ, Kwok MM, Ahn AH, Jennings EA. 5-HT(1D) receptor immunoreactivity in the sphenopalatine ganglion: Implications for the efficacy of triptans in the treatment of autonomic signs associated with cluster headache. Headache. 2011;51:392–402.
    1. Djupesland PG, Messina JC, Mahmoud RA. The nasal approach to delivering treatment for brain diseases: An anatomic, physiologic, and delivery technology overview. Ther Deliv. 2014;5:709–733.
    1. Davies GM, Santanello N, Lipton R. Determinants of patient satisfaction with migraine therapy. Cephalalgia. 2000;20:554–560.
    1. Smelt AF, Louter MA, Kies DA, et al. What do patients consider to be the most important outcomes for effectiveness studies on migraine treatment? Results of a Delphi study. PLoS One. 2014;9:e98933.
    1. Redberg RF. Sham controls in medical device trials. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:892–893.
    1. Moseley JB, O’Malley K, Petersen NJ, et al. A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:81–88.
    1. Oken BS. Placebo effects: Clinical aspects and neurobiology. Brain. 2008;131:2812–2823.
    1. Feleppa M, Apice G, D’Alessio A, Fucci S, Bigal ME. Tolerability of acute migraine medications: Influence of methods of assessment and relationship with headache attributes. Cephalalgia. 2008;28:1012–1016.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner