Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of instruments to measure neck pain disability

Francisco M Kovacs, Joan Bagó, Ana Royuela, Jesús Seco, Sergio Giménez, Alfonso Muriel, Víctor Abraira, José Luis Martín, José Luis Peña, Mario Gestoso, Nicole Mufraggi, Montserrat Núñez, Josep Corcoll, Ignacio Gómez-Ochoa, Ma José Ramírez, Eva Calvo, Ma Dolores Castillo, David Martí, Salvador Fuster, Carmen Fernández, Nuria Gimeno, Alejandro Carballo, Alvaro Milán, Dolores Vázquez, Montserrat Cañellas, Ricardo Blanco, Pilar Brieva, Ma Trinidad Rueda, Luis Alvarez, María Teresa Gil Del Real, Joaquín Ayerbe, Luis González, Leovigildo Ginel, Mariano Ortega, Miryam Bernal, Gonzalo Bolado, Anna Vidal, Ana Ausín, Domingo Ramón, María Antonia Mir, Miquel Tomás, Javier Zamora, Alejandra Cano, Francisco M Kovacs, Joan Bagó, Ana Royuela, Jesús Seco, Sergio Giménez, Alfonso Muriel, Víctor Abraira, José Luis Martín, José Luis Peña, Mario Gestoso, Nicole Mufraggi, Montserrat Núñez, Josep Corcoll, Ignacio Gómez-Ochoa, Ma José Ramírez, Eva Calvo, Ma Dolores Castillo, David Martí, Salvador Fuster, Carmen Fernández, Nuria Gimeno, Alejandro Carballo, Alvaro Milán, Dolores Vázquez, Montserrat Cañellas, Ricardo Blanco, Pilar Brieva, Ma Trinidad Rueda, Luis Alvarez, María Teresa Gil Del Real, Joaquín Ayerbe, Luis González, Leovigildo Ginel, Mariano Ortega, Miryam Bernal, Gonzalo Bolado, Anna Vidal, Ana Ausín, Domingo Ramón, María Antonia Mir, Miquel Tomás, Javier Zamora, Alejandra Cano

Abstract

Background: The NDI, COM and NPQ are evaluation instruments for disability due to NP. There was no Spanish version of NDI or COM for which psychometric characteristics were known. The objectives of this study were to translate and culturally adapt the Spanish version of the Neck Disability Index Questionnaire (NDI), and the Core Outcome Measure (COM), to validate its use in Spanish speaking patients with non-specific neck pain (NP), and to compare their psychometric characteristics with those of the Spanish version of the Northwick Pain Questionnaire (NPQ).

Methods: Translation/re-translation of the English versions of the NDI and the COM was done blindly and independently by a multidisciplinary team. The study was done in 9 primary care Centers and 12 specialty services from 9 regions in Spain, with 221 acute, subacute and chronic patients who visited their physician for NP: 54 in the pilot phase and 167 in the validation phase. Neck pain (VAS), referred pain (VAS), disability (NDI, COM and NPQ), catastrophizing (CSQ) and quality of life (SF-12) were measured on their first visit and 14 days later. Patients' self-assessment was used as the external criterion for pain and disability. In the pilot phase, patients' understanding of each item in the NDI and COM was assessed, and on day 1 test-retest reliability was estimated by giving a second NDI and COM in which the name of the questionnaires and the order of the items had been changed.

Results: Comprehensibility of NDI and COM were good. Minutes needed to fill out the questionnaires [median, (P25, P75)]: NDI. 4 (2.2, 10.0), COM: 2.1 (1.0, 4.9). Reliability: [ICC, (95%CI)]: NDI: 0.88 (0.80, 0.93). COM: 0.85 (0.75,0.91). Sensitivity to change: Effect size for patients having worsened, not changed and improved between days 1 and 15, according to the external criterion for disability: NDI: -0.24, 0.15, 0.66; NPQ: -0.14, 0.06, 0.67; COM: 0.05, 0.19, 0.92.

Validity: Results of NDI, NPQ and COM were consistent with the external criterion for disability, whereas only those from NDI were consistent with the one for pain. Correlations with VAS, CSQ and SF-12 were similar for NDI and NPQ (absolute values between 0.36 and 0.50 on day 1, between 0.38 and 0.70 on day 15), and slightly lower for COM (between 0.36 and 0.48 on day 1, and between 0.33 and 0.61 on day 15). Correlation between NDI and NPQ: r = 0.84 on day 1, r = 0.91 on day 15. Correlation between COM and NPQ: r = 0.63 on day 1, r = 0.71 on day 15.

Conclusion: Although most psychometric characteristics of NDI, NPQ and COM are similar, those from the latter one are worse and its use may lead to patients' evolution seeming more positive than it actually is. NDI seems to be the best instrument for measuring NP-related disability, since its results are the most consistent with patient's assessment of their own clinical status and evolution. It takes two more minutes to answer the NDI than to answer the COM, but it can be reliably filled out by the patient without assistance.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials Register NCT00349544.

References

    1. Cote P, Cassidy J, Carroll L. The Saskatchewan Health and Back Surgery Survery: the prevalence of neck pain and related disability in Saskatchewan. Spine. 1998;23:1689–98. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199808010-00015.
    1. Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Zamora J, Gil del Real MT, Llobera J, Fernández C, and the Kovacs-Atención Primaria Group Correlation between pain, disability and quality of life in patients with common low back pain. Spine. 2004;29:206–210. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000107235.47465.08.
    1. Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 1991;14:409–415.
    1. Leak AM, Cooper J, Dyer S, Williams KA, Turner-Stokes L, Frank AO. The Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire, devised to measure neck pain and disability. Br J Rheumatol. 1994;33:469–74. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/33.5.469.
    1. Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66:271–273.
    1. Wlodyka-Demaille S, Poiraudeau S, Catanzariti JF, Rannou F, Fermanian J, Revel M. French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:376–86. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.30623.
    1. Cook C, Richardson JK, Braga L, Menezes A, Soler X, Kume P, Zaninelli M. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale. Spine. 2006;31:1621–1627. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000221989.53069.16.
    1. Lee H, Nicholson LL, Adams RD, Maher CG, Halaki M, Bae SS. Development and psychometric testing of Korean language versions of 4 neck pain and disability questionnaires. Spine. 2006;31:1841–1845. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000227268.35035.a5.
    1. Bicer A, Yazici A, Camdeviren H, Erdogan C. Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic neck pain: reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the neck pain and disability scale. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:959–962. doi: 10.1080/09638280410001696755.
    1. Ackelman B, Lindgren U. Validity and reliability of a modified version of the neck disability index. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34:284–7. doi: 10.1080/165019702760390383.
    1. Deyo R, Battie M, Beurskens A, Bombardier C, Croft P, Koes B, Malmivaara A, Roland M, Von Korff M, Waddell G. Outcome measures for low back pain research. Spine. 1998;23:2003–13. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199809150-00018.
    1. White P, Lewith G, Precott P. The core outcomes for neck pain: Validation of a new outcome measure. Spine. 2004;29:1923–30. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000137066.50291.da.
    1. Rebbeck TJ, Refshauge KM, Maher CG, Stewart M. Evaluation of the Core Outcome Measure in Whisplash. Spine. 2007;32:696–702. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000257595.75367.52.
    1. González T, Balsa A, Sáinz de Murieta J, Zamorano E, González I, Martín-Mola E. Spanish version of the Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire: Reliability and validity. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2001;19:41–46.
    1. Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Zamora J, Fernández C, and the Spanish Back Pain Research Network The transition from acute to subacute and chronic low back pain. A study based on determinants of quality of life and prediction of chronic disability. Spine. 2005;30:1786–1792. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000172159.47152.dc.
    1. Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain. 2. IASP press, Seattle WA; 1994. Description of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms.
    1. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974;2:1127–1131. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(74)90884-8.
    1. Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bjorner JB, Brazier JE, Bullinger M, Kaasa S, Leplege A, Prieto L, Sullivan M. Cross validation of items selection and scoring for the SF-12 health survey in nine countries: Results from the IQOLA project. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1171–1178. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00109-7.
    1. Rosenstiel AK, Keefe FJ. The use of coping strategies in chronic low back pain patients: relationship to patient characteristics and current adjustment. Pain. 1983;17:33–44. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90125-2.
    1. Rodríguez L, Cano FJ, Blanco A. Evaluación de las estrategias de afrontamiento del dolor crónico. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2004;32:82–91.
    1. Bartko JJ. The intraclass correlation coefficient as a measure of reliability. Psychol Rep. 1966;19:3–11.
    1. Sprangers MA, Moinpour CM, Moynihan TJ, Patrick DL, Revicki DA, Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group Assessing meaningful change in quality of life over time: a users' guide for clinicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:561–71.
    1. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:171–8. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5.
    1. Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989;27:S178–89. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015.
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of a clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.
    1. Fleiss JL, Cohen J. The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability. Educ Psychol Meas. 1973;33:613–619. doi: 10.1177/001316447303300309.
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Cronbach's alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:572.
    1. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310.
    1. Kovacs FM, Llobera J, Gil del Real MT, Abraira V, Gestoso M, Fernández C, Kovacs Atención Primaria Group Validation of the Spanish version of the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Spine. 2002;27:538–42. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200203010-00016.
    1. Flórez MT, García MA, García F, Armenteros J, Alvarez A, Martínez MD. Adaptación transcultural a la población española de la escala de incapacidad por dolor lumbar de Oswestry. Rehabilitación. 1995;29:138–145.
    1. Kovacs FM, Muriel A, Abraira V, Medina JM, Castillo MD, Olabe J, Spanish Back Pain Research Network Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of the FAB Questionnaire. Spine. 2006;31:104–110. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000193912.36742.4f.
    1. Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Royuela A, Corcoll J, Alegre L, Cano A, Muriel A, Zamora J, Gil del Real MT, Gestoso M, Mufraggi N. Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity and disability in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine.
    1. Van der Roer N, Ostelo RWJG, Bekkering G, van Tulder MW, de Wet HCW. Minical clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain. Spine. 2006;31:578–582. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201293.57439.47.
    1. Lee JS, Hobden E, Stiell IG, Wells GA. Clinically important change in the visual analog scale after adequate pain control. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10:1128–30.
    1. Cepeda MS, Africano JM, Polo R, Alcala R, Carr DB. What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? Pain. 2003;105:151–7. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(03)00176-3.
    1. Farrar JT, Young JP, Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149–58. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner