The public health effects of interventions similar to basic income: a scoping review

Marcia Gibson, Wendy Hearty, Peter Craig, Marcia Gibson, Wendy Hearty, Peter Craig

Abstract

Universal, unconditional basic income is attracting increasing policy and academic interest. Income is a key health determinant, and a basic income could affect health through its effect on other determinants, such as employment. However, there is little evidence of its potential effects on public health, because no studies of interventions which meet the definition of basic income have been done. However, there is evidence from studies of interventions with similarities to basic income. Therefore, we aimed to identify these studies and to consider what can be learned from them about the potential effects of such interventions on health and socioeconomic outcomes. We did a systematic scoping review of basic income-like interventions, searching eight bibliographic and eight specialist databases from inception to July, 2019, with extensive hand searching. We included publications in English of quantitative and qualitative studies done in upper-middle-income or high-income countries, of universal, permanent, or subsistence-level interventions providing unconditional payments to individuals or families. We sought to identify the range of outcomes reported by relevant studies, and report health, education, employment, and social outcomes. We extracted and tabulated relevant data and narratively reported effects by intervention and outcome. We identified 27 studies of nine heterogeneous interventions, some universal and permanent, and many evaluated using randomised controlled trials or robust quasi-experimental methods. Evidence on health effects was mixed, with strong positive effects on some outcomes, such as birthweight and mental health, but no effect on others. Employment effects were inconsistent, although mostly small for men and larger for women with young children. There was evidence of spill-over effects in studies measuring effects on large populations. In conclusion, little evidence exists of large reductions in employment, and some evidence suggests positive effects on some other outcomes, including health outcomes. Evidence for macro-level effects is scarce. Quasi-experimental and dynamic modelling approaches are well placed to investigate such effects.

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure
Figure
Study profile

References

    1. Ruckert A, Huynh C, Labonté R. Reducing health inequities: is universal basic income the way forward? J Public Health (Oxf) 2018;40:3–7.
    1. Basic Income Earth Network About basic income. Basic Income Earth Network.
    1. Standing G. Basic Income Earth Network; 2002. About time: basic income security as a right.
    1. Beck S, Pulkki-Brannstrom AM, San Sebastian M. Basic income—healthy outcome? Effects on health of an Indian basic income pilot project: a cluster randomised trial. J Dev Effect. 2015;7:111–126.
    1. Painter A, Thoung D. Royal Society of Arts; London: 2015. Creative citizen, creative state: the principled and pragmatic case for a universal basic income.
    1. Lehto O. Adam Smith Research Trust; London: 2018. Basic income around the world. the unexpected benefits of unconditional cash transfers.
    1. Centre for Social Justice . Centre for Social Justice; London: 2018. Universal basic income: an effective policy for poverty reduction?
    1. Goulden C. Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2018. Universal basic income—not the answer to poverty 2018.
    1. Marinescu I. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2018. No strings attached: the behavioral effects of US unconditional cash transfer programs.
    1. Gibson M, Hearty W, Craig P, Watson N. What Works Scotland; Glasgow: 2017. Review protocol. The impact of universal basic income: a scoping review of evaluations and outcomes.
    1. Greenberg DH, Donna L, Marvin M. The Urban Insitute; Washington, DC: 2003. Social experimentation and public policymaking.
    1. Levine RA, Watts H, Hollister R, Williams W, O'Connor A, Widerquist K. A retrospective on the negative income tax experiments: looking back at the most innovative field studies in social policy. In: Widerquist K, Lewis MA, Pressman S, editors. The ethics and economics of the basic income guarantee. Ashgate; Surrey: 2005. pp. 95–106.
    1. McDonald JF, Stephenson JSP. The effect of income maintenance on the school-enrollment and labor-supply decisions of teenagers. J Hum Resour. 1979;14:488–495.
    1. Maynard RA, Murnane RJ. Effects of a negative income-tax on school performance—results of an experiment. J Hum Resour. 1979;14:463–476.
    1. Calnitsky D. The employer response to the guaranteed annual income. Socio-economic Rev. 2018 doi: 10.1093/ser/mwy009. published online Feb 16.
    1. Choudhry SA, Hum DPJ. Graduated work incentives and how they affect marital stability—the Canadian evidence. Appl Econ Lett. 1995;2:367–371.
    1. Calnitsky D. “More normal than welfare”: the Mincome experiment, stigma, and community experience. Can Rev Sociol. 2016;53:26–71.
    1. Calnitsky D, Latner JP. Basic income in a small town: understanding the elusive effects on work. Soc Probl. 2017;64:373–397.
    1. Forget EL. New questions, new data, old interventions: the health effects of a guaranteed annual income. Prev Med. 2013;57:925–928.
    1. Forget EL, Peden AD, Strobel SB. Cash transfers, basic income and community building. Soc Incl. 2013;1:84.
    1. Forget EL. The town with no poverty: the health effects of a Canadian guaranteed annual income field experiment. Can Public Policy. 2011;37:283–305.
    1. Mallar CD. The educational and labor-supply responses of young adults in experimental families. In: Watts HW, Rees A, editors. New-Jersey Income-Maintenance Experiment 2 Labor-Supply Responses. Academic Press; New York: 1977. pp. 163–184.
    1. Knudsen JH, Scott RA, Shore AR. Household composition. In: Watts HW, Rees A, editors. New Jersey Income Maintenance Experiment, vol 3 expenditures, health, and social behavior, and the quality of the evidence. Academic Press; New York, NY: 1977. pp. 251–276.
    1. Middleton R, Allen VL. Social psychological effects. In: Watts HW, Rees A, editors. New Jersey Income Maintenance Experiment, vol 3 expenditures, health, and social behavior, and the quality of the evidence. Academic Press; New York, NY: 1977. pp. 151–194.
    1. Elesh D, Lefcowitz MJ. The effects of the New Jersey-Pennsylvania Negative Income Tax Experiment on health and health care utilization. J Health Soc Behav. 1977;18:391–405.
    1. Bawden DL, Bryant WK, Cain GG. US Department of Health Education and Welfare; Washington, DC: 1976. The eural income maintenance experiment.
    1. Hannan MT. Noneconomic outcomes. In: Palmer J, Pechman J, editors. Welfare in rural areas: the North Carolina-Iowa income maintenance experiment. Brookings Institution; Washington, DC: 1978. pp. 183–210.
    1. O'Connor JF, Madden JP. The negative income tax and the quality of dietary intake. J Hum Resour. 1979;14:507–517.
    1. Christophersen G. Findings for youth. In: SRI International, editor. Final report of the Seattle-Denver income maintenance experiment, volume 1: design and results. US Department of Health and Human Services; Washington, DC: 1983. pp. 151–160.
    1. Cain GG, Wissoker DA. A reanalysis of marital stability in the Seattle-Denver income-maintenance experiment. Am J Sociol. 1990;95:1235–1269.
    1. Venti SF, Wise DA. Harvard University; 1984. Income Maintenance and the School and Work Decisions of Youth.
    1. Christophersen G. Effects on health and fertility. In: SRI International, editor. Final report of the Seattle-Denver income maintenance experiment, volume 1: design and results. US Department of Health and Human Services; Washington, DC: 1983. pp. 389–396.
    1. Thoits P, Hannan M. Income and psychological distress: the impact of an income-maintenance experiment. J Health Soc Behav. 1979;20:120–138.
    1. Price DJ, Song J. Stanford University; Stanford: 2016. The long-term effects of cash assistance.
    1. Robins PK. The labor supply response of 20-year families in the Denver income-maintenance experiment. Rev Econ Stat. 1984;66:491–495.
    1. Stephens M. Are there treatment duration differences in the Seattle and Denver Income Maintenance Experiments? BE J Econ Anal Policy. 2007;7:43.
    1. Kehrer BH, Wolin CM. Impact of income maintenance on low birth weight: evidence from the Gary Experiment. J Hum Resour. 1979;14:434–462.
    1. Keeley M. Academic Press; New York, NY: 1981. Labor supply and public policy.
    1. Robins PK. A comparison of the labor supply findings from the 4 negative income-tax experiments. J Hum Resour. 1985;20:567–582.
    1. Burtless G. The work responses to a guaranteed income: a survey of experiment evidence. In: Munnell AH, editor. Lessons from the income maintenance experiments: proceedings of a conference held in September 1986. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston and the Brookings Institution; Boston: 1986.
    1. Hum D, Simpson W. Economic response to a guaranteed annual income: experience from Canada and the United States. J Labor Econ. 1993;11:S263–S296.
    1. Watts HW, Bawden DL. Issues and lessons of experimental design. In: Palmer J, Pechman J, editors. Welfare in rural areas: the North Carolina-Iowa income maintenance experiment. Brookings Institution; Washington, DC: 1978.
    1. Maynard RA. The effects of the rural income maintenance experiment on the school performance of children. Am Econ Rev. 1977;67:370–375.
    1. Groeneveld LP, Short JF, Thoits P. SRI International; 1979. Design of a study to assess the impact of income maintenance on delinquency.
    1. Jones D, Marinescu I. University of Chicago; 2018. The labor market impacts of universal and permanent cash transfers: evidence from the Alaska Permanent Fund.
    1. Costello EJ, Compton SN, Keeler G, Angold A. Relationships between poverty and psychopathology: a natural experiment. JAMA. 2003;290:2023–2029.
    1. Evans WN, Moore TJ. The short-term mortality consequences of income receipt. J Public Econ. 2011;95:1410–1424.
    1. Bruckner TA, Brown RA, Margerison-Zilko C. Positive income shocks and accidental deaths among Cherokee Indians: a natural experiment. Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40:1083–1090.
    1. Chung W, Ha H, Kim B. Money transfer and birth weight: evidence from the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend. Econ Inq. 2016;54:576–590.
    1. Watson B, Guettabi M, Reimer MN. Institute of Social and Economic Research; Anchorage, AK: 2019. Universal cash transfers reduce childhood obesity rates.
    1. Akee R, Simeonova E, Copeland W, Angold A, Costello EJ. Young adult obesity and household income: effects of unconditional cash transfers. Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2013;5:1–28.
    1. Akee R, Copeland W, Costello EJ, Simeonova E. How does household income affect child personality traits and behaviors? Am Econ Rev. 2018;108:775–827.
    1. Costello EJ, Erkanli A, Copeland W, Angold A. Association of family income supplements in adolescence with development of psychiatric and substance use disorders in adulthood among an American Indian population. JAMA. 2010;303:1954–1960.
    1. Akee RKQ, Copeland WE, Keeler G, Angold A, Costello EJ. Parents' incomes and children's outcomes: a quasi-experiment. Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2010;2:86–115.
    1. Kodish SR, Gittelsohn J, Oddo VM, Jones-Smith JC. Impacts of casinos on key pathways to health: qualitative findings from American Indian gaming communities in California. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:621.
    1. Basic Income Canada Network . Basic Income Canada Network; Ottawa, ON: 2019. Signposts to success: report of a BICN survey of Ontario basic income recipients.
    1. Hamilton L, Mulvale JP. “Human again”: the (unrealized) promise of basic income in ontario. J Poverty. 2019;23:1–24.
    1. Foley D. The heartland chronicles revisited: the casino's impact on settlement life. Qual Inq. 2005;11:296–320.
    1. Watson B, Guettabi M, Reimer M. Universal cash and crime. Rev Econ Stat. 2019 doi: 10.1162/rest_a_00834. published online April 5.
    1. Kozminski K, Baek J. Can an oil-rich economy reduce its income inequality? Empirical evidence from Alaska's Permanent Fund Dividend. Energy Econ. 2017;65:98–104.
    1. Bibler A, Guettabi M, Reimer MN. Institute of Social and Economic Research; Anchorage, AK: 2019. Short-term labor responses to unconditional cash transfers.
    1. Feinberg RM, Kuehn D. Guaranteed nonlabor income and labor supply: the effect of the Alaska Permanent Fund Dividend. BE J Econ Anal Policy. 2018;18:13.
    1. Salehi-Isfahani D, Mostafavi-Dehzooei MH. Cash transfers and labor supply: evidence from a large-scale program in Iran. J Dev Econ. 2018;135:349–367.
    1. Conner TW, Taggart WA. Assessing the impact of Indian gaming on American Indian nations: is the house winning? Soc Sci Q. 2013;94:1016–1044.
    1. Akee R, Simeonova E, Costello EJ, Copeland W. National Bureau of Economic Research; Cambridge, MA: 2015. How does household income affect child personality traits and behaviors?
    1. Zelleke A. Basic income and the Alaska model: limits of the resource dividend model for the implementation of an unconditional basic income. In: Widerquist K, Howard M, editors. Alaska's Permanent Fund Dividend: examining its suitability as a model. Palgrave Macmillan US; New York, NY: 2012. pp. 141–155.
    1. Greenberg D, Halsey H. Systematic misreporting and effects of income-maintenance experiments on work effort—evidence from the Seattle-Denver experiment. J Labor Econ. 1983;1:380–407.
    1. Jou J, Kozhimannil KB, Abraham JM, Blewett LA, McGovern PM. Paid maternity leave in the United States: associations with maternal and infant health. Matern Child Health J. 2018;22:216–225.
    1. Mallik S, Spiker D. Effective early intervention programs for low birth weight premature infants: review of the Infant Health and Development Program. In: Tremblay RE, Boivin M, Peters RDeV, eds. Encyclopedia on early childhood development.
    1. Jackson CK, Johnson RC, Persico C. The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: evidence from school finance reforms. Q J Econ. 2016;131:157–218.
    1. Crawford C, Cribb J. Centre for Analysis of Youth Transitions; London: 2013. Reading and maths skills at age 10 and earnings in later life: a brief analysis using the British Cohort Study.
    1. Hahn RA, Truman BI. Education improves public health and promotes health equity. Int J Health Serv. 2015;45:657–678.
    1. Banks J, Mazzonna F. The effect of education on old age cognitive abilities: evidence from a regression discontinuity design. Econ J (Lond) 2012;122:418–448.
    1. Evans DK, Popova A. Cash transfers and temptation goods. Econ Dev Cult Change. 2017;65:189–221.
    1. Baird S, McKenzie D, Özler B. World Bank; 2018. The effects of cash transfers on adult labor market outcomes.
    1. Banerjee AV, Hanna R, Kreindler GE, Olken BA. Debunking the stereotype of the lazy welfare recipient: evidence from cash transfer programs. World Bank Res Obs. 2017;32:155–184.
    1. de Hoop J, Rosati FC. Cash transfers and child labor. World Bank Res Obs. 2014;29:202–234.
    1. Kabeer N, Waddington H. Economic impacts of conditional cash transfer programmes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dev Eff. 2015;7:290–303.
    1. Owusu-Addo E, Renzaho AMN, Smith BJ. The impact of cash transfers on social determinants of health and health inequalities in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33:675–696.
    1. Handa S, Daidone S, Peterman A. Myth-busting? Confronting six common perceptions about unconditional cash transfers as a poverty reduction strategy in Africa. World Bank Res Obs. 2018;33:259–298.
    1. Crépon B, Duflo E, Gurgand M, Rathelot R, Zamora P. Do labor market policies have displacement effects? Evidence from a clustered randomized experiment. Q J Econ. 2013;128:531–580.
    1. Gautier P, Muller P, van der Klaauw B. Estimating equilibrium effects of job search assistance. J Labor Econ. 2018;36:1073–1125.
    1. Calnitsky D. Basic income and the pitfalls of randomization. Contexts. 2019;18:22–29.
    1. Innovations for Poverty Action . Innovations for Poverty Action; 2018. The effects of a universal basic income in Kenya.
    1. Silverman E. Springer Open; Cham: 2018. Methodological investigations in agent-based modelling: with applications for the social sciences.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner