Repeat Diagnoses of Bethesda Category III Thyroid Nodules: What To Do Next?

Mi Ri Yoo, Hye Mi Gweon, Ah Young Park, Kyung Eun Cho, Jeong-Ah Kim, Ji Hyun Youk, Eun Ju Son, Mi Ri Yoo, Hye Mi Gweon, Ah Young Park, Kyung Eun Cho, Jeong-Ah Kim, Ji Hyun Youk, Eun Ju Son

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the malignancy rates of thyroid nodules repeatedly classified as Bethesda category III on fine needle aspiration (FNA), and to suggest management guidelines for these lesions.

Methods: This is a retrospective study that included 395 thyroid nodules categorized as Bethesda III undergone either surgery or ultrasound (US) follow-up. There were 67 nodules classified a second time as Bethesda category III on repeat FNA. We compared malignancy rates, clinicopathologic and ultrasonographic characteristics between direct surgery and repeat FNA groups and between the initial and repeat Bethesda category III groups, each. And in the repeat Bethesda III group, clinicopathologic and US variables were compared between benign and malignant nodules.

Results: Incidence of concurrent cancer, underlying thyroiditis and positive BRAF mutation were significantly higher in 142 nodules with direct surgery than 243 nodules with repeat FNA (p < 0.05). Of the 395 nodules with Bethesda category III cytology on initial FNA, the malignancy rate was 59.5%. In 67 nodules with repeat Bethesda III classification, however, the malignancy rate was 73.1% (p < 0.05). However, none of the variables were significantly different between the initial Bethesda category III group and the repeat Bethesda category III group (p > 0.05). In the repeat Bethesda category III group, solid consistency, irregular/microlobulated margins, nonparallel shape, and number of suspicious findings or "suspicious malignant" US assessments were associated with a high malignancy rate (p < 0.05). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the factor associated with malignancy in the repeat Bethesda category III group was irregular/microlobulated margin (odds ratio = 15.576; 95% CI, 2.097-115.6804, p = 0.007) with a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of 81.6%, 83.3%, 93.0%, 62.5% and 82.1%, respectively.

Conclusion: Thyroid nodules with repeated Bethesda category III classification and irregular/microlobulated margins on US are at increased risk of malignancy, and operative management should be considered as opposed to repeat FNA.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Diagnostic outcomes of 772 thyroid…
Fig 1. Diagnostic outcomes of 772 thyroid nodules with Bethesda category III cytology.
f/u, follow-up; US, ultrasound; FNA, fine needle aspiration.

References

    1. Cibas ES, Ali SZ (2009) The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid 19: 1159–1165. 10.1089/thy.2009.0274
    1. Layfield LJ, Morton MJ, Cramer HM, Hirschowitz S (2009) Implications of the proposed thyroid fine-needle aspiration category of "follicular lesion of undetermined significance": A five-year multi-institutional analysis. Diagn Cytopathol 37: 710–714. 10.1002/dc.21093
    1. Kim GR, Yoon JH, Kim EK, Moon HJ, Kwak JY (2014) Benign Aspirates on Follow-Up FNA May Be Enough in Patients with Initial Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance. Int J Endocrinol 2014: 354612 10.1155/2014/354612
    1. Ho AS, Sarti EE, Jain KS, Wang H, Nixon IJ, Shaha AR, et al. (2014) Malignancy rate in thyroid nodules classified as Bethesda category III (AUS/FLUS). Thyroid 24: 832–839. 10.1089/thy.2013.0317
    1. Gweon HM, Son EJ, Youk JH, Kim JA (2013) Thyroid nodules with Bethesda system III cytology: can ultrasonography guide the next step? Ann Surg Oncol 20: 3083–3088. 10.1245/s10434-013-2990-x
    1. Yoo WS, Choi HS, Cho SW, Moon JH, Kim KW, Park HJ, et al. (2014) The role of ultrasound findings in the management of thyroid nodules with atypia or follicular lesions of undetermined significance. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 80: 735–742. 10.1111/cen.12348
    1. Mehta RS, Carty SE, Ohori NP, Hodak SP, Coyne C, LeBeau SO, et al. (2013) Nodule size is an independent predictor of malignancy in mutation-negative nodules with follicular lesion of undetermined significance cytology. Surgery 154: 730–736; discussion 736–738. 10.1016/j.surg.2013.05.015
    1. Carr R, Ustun B, Chhieng D, Schofield K, Theoharis C, Hammers L, et al. (2013) Radiologic and clinical predictors of malignancy in the follicular lesion of undetermined significance of the thyroid. Endocr Pathol 24: 62–68. 10.1007/s12022-013-9240-4
    1. Rosario PW (2014) Thyroid Nodules with Atypia or Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance (Bethesda Category III): Importance of Ultrasonography and Cytological Subcategory. Thyroid 24: 1115–1120. 10.1089/thy.2013.0650
    1. Faquin WC, Baloch ZW (2010) Fine-needle aspiration of follicular patterned lesions of the thyroid: Diagnosis, management, and follow-up according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) recommendations. Diagn Cytopathol 38: 731–739. 10.1002/dc.21292
    1. Kim EK, Park CS, Chung WY, Oh KK, Kim DI, Lee JT, et al. (2002) New sonographic criteria for recommending fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable solid nodules of the thyroid. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178: 687–691.
    1. Kim DW, Lee EJ, Jung SJ, Ryu JH, Kim YM (2011) Role of sonographic diagnosis in managing Bethesda class III nodules. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32: 2136–2141. 10.3174/ajnr.A2686
    1. Yassa L, Cibas ES, Benson CB, Frates MC, Doubilet PM, Gawande AA, et al. (2007) Long-term assessment of a multidisciplinary approach to thyroid nodule diagnostic evaluation. Cancer 111: 508–516.
    1. Broome JT, Cate F, Solorzano CC (2014) Utilization and impact of repeat biopsy for follicular lesion/atypia of undetermined significance. World J Surg 38: 628–633.
    1. VanderLaan PA, Marqusee E, Krane JF (2011) Clinical outcome for atypia of undetermined significance in thyroid fine-needle aspirations: should repeated fna be the preferred initial approach? Am J Clin Pathol 135: 770–775. 10.1309/AJCP4P2GCCDNHFMY
    1. Mendez W, Rodgers SE, Lew JI, Montano R, Solorzano CC (2008) Role of surgeon-performed ultrasound in predicting malignancy in patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules. Ann Surg Oncol 15: 2487–2492. 10.1245/s10434-008-0052-6
    1. Yoon JH, Kwak JY, Kim EK, Moon HJ, Kim MJ, Kim JY, et al. (2010) How to approach thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. Ann Surg Oncol 17: 2147–2155. 10.1245/s10434-010-0992-5
    1. Lee SW, Lee HJ, Kim HJ, Lee J, Park JY, Kim SH, et al. (2013) Combined categorical reporting systems of US and cytology findings for thyroid nodules: guidance on repeat fine-needle aspiration cytology. Radiology 266: 956–963. 10.1148/radiol.12112710

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner