Effect of Aprepitant for the Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial

De-Shen Wang, Ming-Tao Hu, Zhi-Qiang Wang, Chao Ren, Miao-Zhen Qiu, Hui-Yan Luo, Ying Jin, William Pat Fong, Shu-Bin Wang, Jie-Wen Peng, Qing-Feng Zou, Qiong Tan, Feng-Hua Wang, Yu-Hong Li, De-Shen Wang, Ming-Tao Hu, Zhi-Qiang Wang, Chao Ren, Miao-Zhen Qiu, Hui-Yan Luo, Ying Jin, William Pat Fong, Shu-Bin Wang, Jie-Wen Peng, Qing-Feng Zou, Qiong Tan, Feng-Hua Wang, Yu-Hong Li

Abstract

Importance: The prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting has an important role in the overall management of cancer treatment.

Objective: To evaluate whether adding aprepitant to palonosetron and dexamethasone can further prevent the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting caused by FOLFIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan) or FOLFOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) chemotherapy regimens among women with gastrointestinal cancer at higher risk.

Design, setting, and participants: This phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial recruited young women (age ≤50 years) who drank little or no alcohol and had gastrointestinal cancer for which they received FOLFOX or FOLFIRI chemotherapy. A total of 248 women were enrolled and assigned in the ratio 1:1 to intervention and control groups from August 4, 2015, to March 31, 2020. Intention-to-treat analysis was used to evaluate patient baseline characteristics and efficacy. The analysis was conducted on October 30, 2020.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to the aprepitant group (aprepitant, 125 mg, orally 60 minutes before initiation of chemotherapy on day 1 and 80 mg orally each morning of days 2 and 3; palonosetron, 0.25 mg, intravenously; and dexamethasone, 6 mg, orally 30 minutes before chemotherapy initiation on day 1) or the placebo group (placebo, 125 mg, orally 60 minutes before initiation of chemotherapy on day 1 and 80 mg orally on each morning of days 2 and 3; palonosetron, 0.25 mg, intravenously; and dexamethasone, 12 mg, orally 30 minutes before chemotherapy initiation on day 1).

Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was the complete response (CR) rate, defined as the proportion of patients without emesis episodes or rescue medication use during the overall phase of the first cycle. Other efficacy indicators, such as no vomiting and no nausea, were measured as the secondary and exploratory end points.

Results: A total of 248 women from 4 clinical centers in China entered this study, and 243 patients (aprepitant regimen, 125 patients [51.4%]; placebo regimen, 118 patients [48.5%]) were evaluable for efficacy and safety; mean (SD) age of the total population was 40.1 (7.3) years. The CR rate was significantly higher in the aprepitant group vs the control group overall (107 [87.0%] vs 80 [66.7%]; P < .001) and in the acute (114 [92.7%] vs 91 [75.8%]; P = .001) and delayed (109 [88.6%] vs 84 [70.0%]; P = .001) phases of the trial. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the 2 groups (100 [80.0%] vs 96 [81.3%]; P = .79), and no grade 3 or 4 aprepitant treatment-related adverse events were observed. Multivariable analysis revealed that aprepitant use was the only independent factor associated with CR during the overall phase.

Conclusions and relevance: The combination of aprepitant with palonosetron and dexamethasone provided increased antiemetic efficacy in the FOLFOX or FOLFIRI chemotherapy regimen and was well tolerated by younger women with gastrointestinal cancer who have a history of little or no alcohol consumption.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03674294.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Li reported receiving grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials…
Figure 1.. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Diagram
Figure 2.. Proportion of Patients Achieving Complete…
Figure 2.. Proportion of Patients Achieving Complete Response or No Vomiting Overall and by Study Phase
A, Proportion of patients achieving complete response in the aprepitant and placebo groups during the acute, delayed, and overall phases. B, Proportion of patients without vomiting in the aprepitant and placebo groups during the acute, delayed, and overall phases.
Figure 3.. The Proportion of Patients With…
Figure 3.. The Proportion of Patients With Emesis or Chemotherapy-Associated Nausea and Vomiting (CINV) per Day

References

    1. Grunberg SM, Deuson RR, Mavros P, et al. . Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis after modern antiemetics. Cancer. 2004;100(10):2261-2268. doi:10.1002/cncr.20230
    1. Haiderali A, Menditto L, Good M, Teitelbaum A, Wegner J. Impact on daily functioning and indirect/direct costs associated with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in a US population. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19(6):843-851. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-0915-9
    1. Bloechl-Daum B, Deuson RR, Mavros P, Hansen M, Herrstedt J. Delayed nausea and vomiting continue to reduce patients’ quality of life after highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy despite antiemetic treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(27):4472-4478. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.05.6382
    1. Grunberg SM, Warr D, Gralla RJ, et al. . Evaluation of new antiemetic agents and definition of antineoplastic agent emetogenicity—state of the art. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19(suppl 1):S43-S47. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-1003-x
    1. Tournigand C, André T, Achille E, et al. . FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(2):229-237. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.05.113
    1. Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Herrstedt J, et al. . Combined data from two phase III trials of the NK1 antagonist aprepitant plus a 5HT 3 antagonist and a corticosteroid for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: effect of gender on treatment response. Support Care Cancer. 2006;14(4):354-360. doi:10.1007/s00520-005-0914-4
    1. Aapro M, Carides A, Rapoport BL, Schmoll HJ, Zhang L, Warr D. Aprepitant and fosaprepitant: a 10-year review of efficacy and safety. Oncologist. 2015;20(4):450-458. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0229
    1. de Wit R, Herrstedt J, Rapoport B, et al. . The oral NK(1) antagonist, aprepitant, given with standard antiemetics provides protection against nausea and vomiting over multiple cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy: a combined analysis of two randomised, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(3):403-410. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2003.08.028
    1. Gralla RJ, de Wit R, Herrstedt J, et al. . Antiemetic efficacy of the neurokinin-1 antagonist, aprepitant, plus a 5HT3 antagonist and a corticosteroid in patients receiving anthracyclines or cyclophosphamide in addition to high-dose cisplatin: analysis of combined data from two phase III randomized clinical trials. Cancer. 2005;104(4):864-868. doi:10.1002/cncr.21222
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) . Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Antiemesis, Version 2. 2020. Accessed October 20, 2020.
    1. Roila F, Molassiotis A, Herrstedt J, et al. ; participants of the MASCC/ESMO Consensus Conference Copenhagen 2015 . 2016 MASCC and ESMO guideline update for the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and of nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v119-v133. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdw270
    1. Rapoport BL, Jordan K, Boice JA, et al. . Aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with a broad range of moderately emetogenic chemotherapies and tumor types: a randomized, double-blind study. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18(4):423-431. doi:10.1007/s00520-009-0680-9
    1. Kim JE, Jang JS, Kim JW, et al. . Efficacy and safety of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting during the first cycle of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in Korean patients with a broad range of tumor types. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(3):801-809. doi:10.1007/s00520-016-3463-0
    1. Lindley CM, Hirsch JD, O’Neill CV, Transau MC, Gilbert CS, Osterhaus JT. Quality of life consequences of chemotherapy-induced emesis. Qual Life Res. 1992;1(5):331-340. doi:10.1007/BF00434947
    1. Tanioka M, Kitao A, Matsumoto K, et al. . A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of aprepitant in nondrinking women younger than 70 years receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2013;109(4):859-865. doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.400
    1. Razvi Y, Chan S, McFarlane T, et al. . ASCO, NCCN, MASCC/ESMO: a comparison of antiemetic guidelines for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in adult patients. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(1):87-95. doi:10.1007/s00520-018-4464-y
    1. Warr DG, Hesketh PJ, Gralla RJ, et al. . Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(12):2822-2830. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.09.050
    1. Warr DG, Street JC, Carides AD. Evaluation of risk factors predictive of nausea and vomiting with current standard-of-care antiemetic treatment: analysis of phase 3 trial of aprepitant in patients receiving adriamycin-cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19(6):807-813. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-0899-5
    1. Yoshida N, Taguchi T, Nakanishi M, et al. . Efficacy of the combination use of aprepitant and palonosetron for improving nausea in various moderately emetogenic chemotherapy regimens. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019;20(1):6. doi:10.1186/s40360-018-0278-2
    1. Rothenberg ML, Oza AM, Bigelow RH, et al. . Superiority of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil-leucovorin compared with either therapy alone in patients with progressive colorectal cancer after irinotecan and fluorouracil-leucovorin: interim results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(11):2059-2069. doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.11.126
    1. Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, et al. . Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2000;355(9209):1041-1047. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02034-1
    1. Hesketh PJ, Wright O, Rosati G, et al. . Single-dose intravenous casopitant in combination with ondansetron and dexamethasone for the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced nausea and vomiting: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, two arm, parallel group study. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(7):1471-1478. doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1235-4
    1. Nishimura J, Satoh T, Fukunaga M, et al. ; Multi-center Clinical Study Group of Osaka, Colorectal Cancer Treatment Group (MCSGO) . Combination antiemetic therapy with aprepitant/fosaprepitant in patients with colorectal cancer receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (SENRI trial): a multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(10):1274-1282. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.03.024
    1. Takemoto H, Nishimura J, Komori T, et al. ; Multicenter Clinical Study Group of Osaka, Colorectal Cancer Treatment Group (MCSGO) . Combination antiemetic therapy with aprepitant/fosaprepitant in patients with colorectal cancer receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in the SENRI trial: analysis of risk factors for vomiting and nausea. Int J Clin Oncol. 2017;22(1):88-95. doi:10.1007/s10147-016-1022-9
    1. Molassiotis A, Aapro M, Dicato M, et al. . Evaluation of risk factors predicting chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting: results from a European prospective observational study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014;47(5):839-848.e4. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.06.012

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner