Characteristics, treatment and quality of life of stable coronary artery disease patients with or without angina: Insights from the START study

Leonardo De Luca, Pier Luigi Temporelli, Donata Lucci, Furio Colivicchi, Paolo Calabrò, Carmine Riccio, Antonio Amico, Franco Mascia, Emanuele Proia, Andrea Di Lenarda, Michele Massimo Gulizia, START Investigators, Leonardo De Luca, Pier Luigi Temporelli, Donata Lucci, Furio Colivicchi, Paolo Calabrò, Carmine Riccio, Antonio Amico, Franco Mascia, Emanuele Proia, Andrea Di Lenarda, Michele Massimo Gulizia, START Investigators

Abstract

Data on contemporary management patterns of angina in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) are scarce. We sought to describe the current presentation, management, and quality of life of stable CAD patients with or without angina, using the data from the START (STable Coronary Artery Diseases RegisTry) study. START was a prospective, observational, nationwide study aimed to evaluate the presentation, management, treatment and quality of life of stable CAD presenting to cardiologists during outpatient visits or discharged from cardiology wards. Among the 5070 consecutive stable CAD patients enrolled in 183 participating centers over a 3-month period, 3714 (73.2%) had no angina and 1356 (26.8%) presented with angina. Patients with angina underwent more frequently coronary angiography (92.7% vs 84.9%; p<0.0001) and other diagnostic imaging procedures compared to those without angina. In addition, patients with angina received more frequently different combinations of first line therapies and angina relief drugs compared to patients without angina. The quality of life, assessed with the EQ 5D-5L questionnaire, did not differ between the two groups, with the exception of the 'pain or worry' domain that was higher in patients with compared to those without angina (p<0.0001). Current management and treatment of stable CAD patients with angina is still suboptimal and different compared to those without angina. Our findings highlight the need for disseminating best-practice patterns and improving guidelines adherence for the management of angina even among cardiologists.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. De Luca and Dr. Temporelli report personal fees from Menarini, outside the submitted work; Lucci is an employee of Heart Care Foundation, which conducted the study with an unresctricted grant of research from Menarini, Italy. These commenrcial fundings do not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. All other authors have reported that no potential conflicts of interest exist with any companies/organizations whose products or services may be discussed in this article.

Figures

Fig 1. Cardiovascular drugs † prescribed at…
Fig 1. Cardiovascular drugs† prescribed at the end of the visit or at hospital discharge in patients with and without angina.
†Drugs not reported have been used in less than 5% of cases. ACE-I: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARB: angiotensin receptor blockers; ASA: acetylsalicylic acid; DAPT: dual antiplatelet therapy; MRA: mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; OAT: oral anticoagulation therapy.
Fig 2. Use of combinations of angina…
Fig 2. Use of combinations of angina relief drugs in patients with and without angina.
βB: beta-blockers; CCBs: calcium channel blockers.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Domain of movement ability (panel A), body care (panel B), daily activities (panel C), pain/worry (panel D), and anxiety/depression (panel E) of the EQ 5D-5L questionnaire in patients with and without angina.

References

    1. Fihn SD, Blankenship JC, Alexander KP, Bittl JA, Byrne JG, Fletcher BJ, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation 2014;130:1749–1767. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000095
    1. Montalescot G, Sechtem U, Achenbach S, Andreotti F, Arden C, Budaj A, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2949–3003. 10.1093/eurheartj/eht296
    1. Daly CA, Clemens F, Sendon JL, Tavazzi L, Boersma E, Danchin N, et al.; Euro Heart Survey Investigators. The clinical characteristics and investigations planned in patients with stable angina presenting to cardiologists in Europe: from the Euro Heart Survey of Stable Angina. Eur Heart J 2005;26:996–1010. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi171
    1. Komajda M, Weidinger F, Kerneis M, Cosentino F, Cremonesi A, Ferrari R, et al. EURObservational Research Programme: the Chronic Ischaemic Cardiovascular Disease Registry: Pilot phase (CICD-PILOT). Eur Heart J 2016;37:152–60. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv437
    1. Steg PG, Greenlaw N, Tendera M, Tardif JC, Ferrari R, Al-Zaibag M, et al. Prospective Observational Longitudinal Registry of Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease (CLARIFY) Investigators. Prevalence of anginal symptoms and myocardial ischemia and their effect on clinical outcomes in outpatients with stable coronary artery disease: data from the International Observational CLARIFY Registry. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:1651–1659. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3773
    1. De Luca L, Temporelli PL, Lucci D, Gonzini L, Riccio C, Colivicchi F, et al.; START Investigators. Current management and treatment of patients with stable coronary artery diseases presenting to cardiologists in different clinical contexts: A prospective, observational, nationwide study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018;25:43–53 10.1177/2047487317740663
    1. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Quality of Life Research 2011;20:1727–1736. 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x
    1. Beltrame JF, Weekes AJ, Morgan C, Tavella R, Spertus JA. The prevalence of weekly angina among patients with chronic stable angina in primary care practices: The Coronary Artery Disease in General Practice (CADENCE) Study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1491–9. 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.295
    1. Hui G, Koch B, Calara F, Wong ND. Angina in coronary artery disease patients with and without diabetes: US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001–2010. Clin Cardiol. 2016;39:30–6. 10.1002/clc.22488
    1. Kureshi F, Shafiq A, Arnold SV, Gosch K, Breeding T, Kumar AS, et al. The prevalence and management of angina among patients with chronic coronary artery disease across US outpatient cardiology practices: insights from the Angina Prevalence and Provider Evaluation of Angina Relief (APPEAR) study. Clin Cardiol. 2017;40:6–10. 10.1002/clc.22628
    1. Parikh KS, Coles A, Schulte PJ, Kraus WE, Fleg JL, Keteyian SJ, et al. Relation of angina pectoris to outcomes, quality of life, and response to exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure (from HF-ACTION). Am J Cardiol 2016;118:1211–1216. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.07.040
    1. Ohman EM. Chronic Stable Angina. N Engl J Med 2016;374:1167–1176. 10.1056/NEJMcp1502240
    1. Eisen A, Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Eagle KA, Goto S, Guo J, et al. Angina and Future Cardiovascular Events in Stable Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016. October; 5(10): e004080 10.1161/JAHA.116.004080
    1. Jones DA, Timmis A, Wragg A. Novel drugs for treating angina. BMJ. 2013;347:f4726 10.1136/bmj.f4726
    1. Zarifis J, Grammatikou V, Kallistratos M, Katsivas A; Investigators of the Prospective, Noninterventional, Observational Study of the Antianginal Efficacy of Ivabradine During a 4-Month Treatment of a Greek Population With Coronary Artery Disease. Treatment of Stable Angina Pectoris With Ivabradine in Everyday Practice: A Pan‐Hellenic, Prospective, Noninterventional Study. Clin Cardiol. 2015; 38: 725–732. 10.1002/clc.22479
    1. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, Hartigan PM, Maron DJ, Kostuk WJ, et al.; COURAGE Trial Research Group. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1503–1516. 10.1056/NEJMoa070829
    1. Sedlis SP, Hartigan PM, Teo KK, Maron DJ, Spertus JA, Mancini GB, et al.; COURAGE Trial Investigators. Effect of PCI on long-term survival in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. N Engl J Med 2015;373:1937–1946. 10.1056/NEJMoa1505532
    1. Stergiopoulos K, Boden WE, Hartigan P, Möbius-Winkler S, Hambrecht R, Hueb W, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes in patients with stable obstructive coronary artery disease and myocardial ischemia: a collaborative meta-analysis of contemporary randomized clinical trials. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:232–240. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12855
    1. O'Rourke RA. Optimal medical therapy is a proven option for chronic stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:905–907. 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.015
    1. Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2005;111:2906–2912. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.521864
    1. Al-Lamee R, Thompson D, Dehbi HM, Sen S, Tang K, Davies J, et al.; ORBITA Investigators. Percutaneous coronary intervention in stable angina (ORBITA): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2018;391:31–40. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32714-9

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner