Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus Tablets Versus Twice-Daily Capsules in De Novo Liver Transplant

Derek A DuBay, Lewis Teperman, Kimi Ueda, Andrew Silverman, William Chapman, Angel E Alsina, Carmelina Tyler, Daniel R Stevens, Derek A DuBay, Lewis Teperman, Kimi Ueda, Andrew Silverman, William Chapman, Angel E Alsina, Carmelina Tyler, Daniel R Stevens

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of once-daily extended-release tacrolimus tablets (LCPT) in de novo liver transplantation have not been previously reported. In this phase II, randomized, open-label study, de novo liver transplant recipients were randomized to LCPT 0.07-0.13 mg/kg/day (taken once daily; n = 29) or twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus capsules (IR-Tac) at 0.10-0.15 mg/kg/day (divided twice daily; n = 29). Subsequent doses of both drugs were adjusted to maintain tacrolimus trough concentrations of 5 to 20 ng/mL through day 90, and 5-15 ng/mL thereafter. Twenty-four-hour pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained on days 1, 7, and 14, with trough concentration and efficacy/safety monitoring through year 1. Similar proportions of patients in both groups achieved therapeutic trough concentrations on days 7 and 14 (day 7: LCPT = 78%, IR-Tac = 75%; day 14: LCPT = 86%, IR-Tac = 91%) as well as similar systemic and peak exposure. There was a robust correlation between drug concentration at time 0 and area under the concentration-time curve for both LCPT and IR-Tac (respectively, day 7: r = 0.86 and 0.79; day 14: r = 0.93 and 0.86; P < .0001 for all). Dose adjustments during days 1 to 14 were frequent. Thirty-five patients completed the extended-use period. No significant differences in adverse events were seen between groups. Incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (LCPT = 6 and IR-Tac = 4) was similar on day 360. Between formulations, overall exposure was similar at 1 week after transplant with the characteristic delayed-release pharmacokinetic profile of LCPT demonstrated in this novel population. These data support further investigation of the safety and efficacy of LCPT in de novo liver transplantation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00772148.

Keywords: acute rejection; calcineurin inhibitor; immunosuppression; phase II; safety.

Conflict of interest statement

K.U. receives honoraria from Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Astellas Pharma US, Inc. for serving on speakers' bureaus. A.S. receives honoraria from Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for service on their speakers' bureau. A.E.A. receives honoraria from Eisai and Bayer for consulting on advisory boards, and from Bayer and Novartis for serving on speakers' bureaus. C.T. and D.R.S. received their standard salary from Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. during their work on the manuscript. D.A.D., W.C., and L. T. declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

© 2019 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Subject disposition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
24‐hour arithmetic mean whole blood tacrolimus concentrations (ng/mL) and SD on days 1, 7, and 14 for LCPT and IR‐Tac. All BLQ values entered as zero and included as such in the calculation of means. BLQ, below limit of quantification; IR‐Tac, twice‐daily immediate‐release tacrolimus capsules; LCPT, once‐daily extended‐release tablet formulation of tacrolimus; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
24‐hour arithmetic mean whole blood tacrolimus concentrations (ng/mL) and SD on days 1, 7, and 14 for LCPT and IR‐Tac, exposure normalized.* All BLQ values entered as zero and included as such in the calculation of means. BLQ, below limit of quantification; IR‐Tac, twice‐daily immediate‐release tacrolimus capsules; LCPT, once‐daily extended‐release tablet formulation of tacrolimus; SD, standard deviation. *Exposure normalization is an adjustment by which the AUC of LCPT and IR‐Tac are made equal, and all other pharmacokinetic parameters mathematically adjusted, to allow direct comparisons of pharmacokinetic parameters under assumption of equivalent exposure.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Correlation between dose‐normalized AUC0–24h and Cmin on day 7 for LCPT and IR‐Tac. IR‐Tac, twice‐daily immediate‐release tacrolimus capsules; LCPT, once‐daily extended‐release tablet formulation of tacrolimus.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Correlation between dose‐normalized AUC0–24h and Cmin on day 14 for LCPT and IR‐Tac. IR‐Tac, twice‐daily immediate‐release tacrolimus capsules; LCPT, once‐daily extended‐release tablet formulation of tacrolimus.

References

    1. Matas AJ, Smith JM, Skeans MA, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2011 Annual data report: kidney. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR). Am J Transplant. 2013;13(suppl 1):11–46.
    1. Webster AC, Taylor RRS, Chapman JR, Craig JC. Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(4):CD003961.
    1. Kramer BK, Del Castillo D, Margreiter R, et al. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with ciclosporin A in renal transplantation: three‐year observational results. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23(7):2386–2392.
    1. Staatz CE, Tett SE. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tacrolimus in solid organ transplantation. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004;43(10):623–653.
    1. Venkataramanan R, Jain A, Cadoff E, et al. Pharmacokinetics of FK 506: preclinical and clinical studies. Transplant Proc. 1990;22(1):52–56.
    1. Claxton AJ, Cramer J, Pierce C. A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther. 2001;23(8):1296–1310.
    1. Eisen SA, Miller DK, Woodward RS, Spitznagel E, Przybeck TR. The effect of prescribed daily dose frequency on patient medication compliance. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(9):1881–1884.
    1. Feldman HI, Hackett M, Bilker W, Strom BL. Potential utility of electronic drug compliance monitoring in measures of adverse outcomes associated with immunosuppressive agents. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1999;8(1):1–14.
    1. Saini SD, Schoenfeld P, Kaulback K, Dubinsky MC. Effect of medication dosing frequency on adherence in chronic diseases. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(6):e22–e33.
    1. Morrissey PE, Reinert S, Yango A, Gautam A, Monaco A, Gohh R. Factors contributing to acute rejection in renal transplantation: the role of noncompliance. Transplant Proc. 2005;37(5):2044–2047.
    1. Endrenyi L, Tothfalusi L. Metrics for the evaluation of bioequivalence of modified‐release formulations. AAPS J. 2012;14(4):813–819.
    1. Gaber AO, Alloway RR, Bodziak K, Kaplan B, Bunnapradist S. Conversion from twice‐daily tacrolimus capsules to once‐daily extended‐release tacrolimus (LCPT): a phase 2 trial of stable renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2013;96(2):191–197.
    1. Bunnapradist S, Rostaing L, Alloway RR, et al. LCPT once‐daily extended‐release tacrolimus tablets versus twice‐daily capsules: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 trials in important de novo and stable kidney transplant recipient subgroups. Transpl Int. 2016;29(5):603–611.
    1. Langone A, Steinberg SM, Gedaly R, et al. Switching STudy of Kidney TRansplant PAtients with Tremor to LCP‐TacrO (STRATO): an open‐label, multicenter, prospective phase 3b study. Clin Transplant. 2015;29(9):796–805.
    1. Budde K, Bunnapradist S, Grinyo JM, et al. Novel once‐daily extended‐release tacrolimus (LCPT) versus twice‐daily tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplants: one‐year results of phase III, double‐blind, randomized trial. Am J Transplant. 2014;14(12):2796–2806.
    1. Bunnapradist S, Ciechanowski K, West‐Thielke P, et al. Conversion from twice‐daily tacrolimus to once‐daily extended release tacrolimus (LCPT): the phase III randomized MELT trial. Am J Transplant. 2013;13(3):760–769.
    1. Rostaing L, Bunnapradist S, Grinyo JM, et al. Novel once‐daily extended‐release tacrolimus versus twice‐daily tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients: two‐year results of phase 3, double‐blind, randomized trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;67(4):648–659.
    1. Alloway RR, Eckhoff DE, Washburn WK, Teperman LW. Conversion from twice‐daily tacrolimus capsules to once‐daily extended‐release tacrolimus (LCPT): phase II trial of stable liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2014;20(5):564–575.
    1. Wiesner RH. A long‐term comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) versus cyclosporine in liver transplantation: a report of the United States FK506 Study Group. Transplantation. 1998;66(4):493–499.
    1. Gerard C, Stocco J, Hulin A, et al. Determination of the most influential sources of variability in tacrolimus trough blood concentrations in adult liver transplant recipients: a bottom‐up approach. AAPS J. 2014;16(3):379–391.
    1. Zhang S, Pillai VC, Mada SR, Strom S, Venkataramanan R. Effect of voriconazole and other azole antifungal agents on CYP3A activity and metabolism of tacrolimus in human liver microsomes. Xenobiotica. 2012;42(5):409–416.
    1. Fischer L, Trunecka P, Gridelli B, et al. Pharmacokinetics for once‐daily versus twice‐daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo liver transplantation: a randomized, open‐label trial. Liver Transpl. 2011;17(2):167–177.
    1. Tremblay S, Nigro V, Weinberg J, Woodle ES, Alloway RR. A steady‐state head‐to‐head pharmacokinetic comparison of all FK‐506 (tacrolimus) formulations (ASTCOFF): an open‐label, prospective, randomized, two‐arm, three‐period crossover study. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(2):432–442.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner