Early postoperative pain after subxiphoid uniportal thoracoscopic major lung resection: a prospective, single- blinded, randomized controlled trial

Zhigang Chen, Lei Jiang, Hua Zheng, Wentian Zhang, Xin Lv, Amr Abdellateef, Zhigang Chen, Lei Jiang, Hua Zheng, Wentian Zhang, Xin Lv, Amr Abdellateef

Abstract

Objectives: Preoperative selection bias led to the inability to generalize the proposed benefit of subxiphoid uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SVATS) as having less postoperative pain than uniportal intercostal VATS. So, we conducted this prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial to investigate the hypothesis that SVATS may have less early postoperative pain than UVATS in patients who undergo major lung resection for early-stage lung cancer.

Methodsa total of: 262 patients were randomly allocated between 2 groups (each with 131 patients), the first being the UVATS group and the second being the SVATS group. The values indicated on the numerical rating scale (NRS) of pain were collected at 24 h and 48 h during rest and during coughing. In addition, different perioperative variables were analysed and compared between the 2 groups.

Results: Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the type of surgical approach was a significant predictor of the postoperative NRS values. The postoperative NRS pain values were significantly lower in the SVATS group after 24 h during rest and coughing and after 48 h during coughing. Postoperatively, patients in the SVATS group got out of bed significantly earlier [16.37 (2.54) vs 18.05 (3.29) h, p < 0.001]. The SVATS group showed a significantly higher rate of intraoperative arrhythmia [20 (15.3%) vs 3 (2.3%) patients, p = 0.03].

Conclusions: SVATS major pulmonary resection in early-stage lung cancer is associated with less early postoperative pain than the UVATS approach. Operating on patients with cardiac problems using the SVATS approach is still a limiting factor for randomization due to the potential compression on the heart with resulting arrhythmia.

Clinical trial registration: The trial was registered under clinical trials.gov Identifier: NCT03331588. https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03331588.

Keywords: Lung resection; Pain; Subxiphoid; VATS.

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
(A) Intercostal incision between the mid-axillary and anterior axillary lines in the 4th or 5th intercostal space; (B): subxiphoid incision extending from the xiphi-sternal junction to 1 cm below the xiphoid process; (C): specially designed subxiphoid instruments (Shanghai Medical Instruments Group Ltd, )
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Box-and-whisker plot showing the median NRS of pain between the 2 studied groups (circles denote outliers that are more than 1.5 interquartile ranges and less than 3 interquartile ranges (stars denote outliers that are more than 3 interquartile ranges).
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/9245390/bin/ivac133f3.jpg

References

    1. Hernandez-Arenas LA, Lin L, Yang Y, Liu M, Guido W, Gonzalez-Rivas D. et al. Initial experience in uniportal subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for major lung resections. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;50:1060–6.
    1. Abdellateef A, Yang C, Chen J, Qu J, Huang J, Jiang L.. Subxiphoid uniportal video assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy, evolution of the technique and progress of learning curve. Shanghai Chest 2018;2:88.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c332. Published 2010 23. 10.1136/bmj.c332
    1. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ. et al. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Bmj 2010;340:c869.
    1. Cai H, Xie D, Al Sawalhi S, Jiang L, Zhu Y, Jiang G. et al. Subxiphoid versus intercostal uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for bilateral lung resections: a single-institution experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020;57:343–9.
    1. Gonzalez-Rivas D, Fieira E, Delgado M, Mendez L, Fernandez R, de la Torre M.. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. J Thorac Dis 2013;5 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S234–S245.
    1. Gonzalez-Rivas D, Mendez L, Delgado M, Fieira E, Fernandez R, de la Torre M.. Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomic segmentectomy. J Thorac Dis 2013;5:S226–S233.
    1. Aresu G, Wu L, Lin L, Jiang G, Jiang L.. The Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital subxiphoid approach for lobectomies. J Vis Surg 2016;2:135.
    1. Aresu G, Weaver H, Wu L, Lin L, Jiang G, Jiang L.. The Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital uniportal subxiphoid approach for lung segmentectomies. J Vis Surg 2016;2:172.
    1. Ali J, Haiyang F, Aresu G, Chenlu Y, Gening J, Gonzalez-Rivas D. et al. Uniportal subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy: technique and results. Ann Thorac Surg 2018;106:1519–24.
    1. Abdellateef A, Ma X, Chen Z, Wu L, Cai J, Jiang L.. Subxiphoid uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: feasibility, quality of life and financial worthiness. Thorac Cancer 2020;11:1414–22.
    1. Abdellateef A, Ma X, Qiao W, Chen Z, Wu L, Cai J. et al. Subxiphoid uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy: effect of learning curve and future perspectives. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2020;58:i50–i57.
    1. Chen J, Volpi S, Ali JM, Aresu G, Wu L, Chen Z. et al. Comparison of post-operative pain and quality of life between uniportal subxiphoid and intercostal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. J Thorac Dis 2020;12:3582–90.
    1. Aresu G, Jiang L, Bertolaccini L.. Subxiphoid video-assisted major lung resections: the Believers’ speech. J Thorac Dis 2017;9:E387–E389.
    1. Abdellateef A, Ali JM, Jiang G, Aresu G, Jiang L.. Tips and tricks for success in subxiphoid video-assisted thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis 2019;11:292–301.
    1. Pennefather SH, McKevith J, Pain management after thoracic surgery. In: Slinger P, editor. Principles and Practice of Anesthesia for Thoracic Surgery, vol. 675. Berlin: Springer;2011. 10.1007/978-1-4419-0184-2_46.
    1. Tong Y, Wei P, Wang S, Sun Q, Cui Y, Ning N. et al. Characteristics of Postoperative Pain After VATS and Pain-Related Factors: the Experience in National Cancer Center of China. J Pain Res 2020;13:1861–7.
    1. Wang H, Li S, Liang N, Liu W, Liu H, Liu H.. Postoperative pain experiences in Chinese adult patients after thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracic surgery. J Clin Nurs 2017;26:2744–54.
    1. Mei LX, Wang YY, Chen Y, Dai L, Chen MW.. Subxiphoid versus intercostal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung resection: a meta-analysis. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2020. 15;1–11. [TQ3]
    1. Li L, Tian H, Yue W, Li S, Gao C, Si L.. Subxiphoid vs intercostal single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg 2016;30:99–103.
    1. Batchelor TJP, Rasburn NJ, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, Brunelli A, Cerfolio RJ, Gonzalez M. et al. Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019;55:91–115.
    1. Gerner P. Post-thoracotomy pain management problems. Anesthesiol Clin 2008;26:355–66.
    1. Pan ZZ, Tershner SA, Fields HL.. Cellular mechanism for anti-analgesic action of agonists of the kappa-opioid receptor. Nature 1997;389:382–405.
    1. Peng Z, Li H, Zhang C, Qian X, Feng Z, Zhu S.. A retrospective study of chronic post-surgical pain following thoracic surgery: prevalence, risk factors, incidence of neuropathic component, and impact on quality of life. PLoS One 2014;9:e90014.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner