Implications of incidentally discovered, nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors: short-term and long-term patient outcomes

Alex B Haynes, Vikram Deshpande, Thun Ingkakul, Parsia A Vagefi, Jackie Szymonifka, Sarah P Thayer, Cristina R Ferrone, Jennifer A Wargo, Andrew L Warshaw, Carlos Fernández-del Castillo, Alex B Haynes, Vikram Deshpande, Thun Ingkakul, Parsia A Vagefi, Jackie Szymonifka, Sarah P Thayer, Cristina R Ferrone, Jennifer A Wargo, Andrew L Warshaw, Carlos Fernández-del Castillo

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the characteristics and outcomes after resection of incidentally discovered, nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs).

Design: Case series.

Setting: Academic hospital.

Patients: Consecutive patients with an incidentally identified, nonfunctioning PET resected from May 1, 1977, through July 31, 2009.

Main outcome measures: Operative morbidity and survival after resection.

Results: A total of 139 patients with median age of 56 years (range, 21-85 years) underwent resection; tumor size ranged from 0.4 to 17.0 cm, with median size of 3.0 cm. No perioperative deaths were reported. Sixty-one patients (43.9%) experienced a perioperative complication. Twenty-six tumors (18.7%) were classified as benign, 39 (28.1%) as malignant, and 72 (51.8%) as uncertain. We were unable to confidently classify 2 tumors due to lack of information regarding mitotic rate in the pathology report. Complete follow-up was available for 112 patients (80.6%) (median, 34.2 months). Five-year actuarial survival rates were 88.8% for patients with benign disease, 92.5% for patients with tumors of uncertain biology, and 49.8% for those with malignant tumors (P = .01). Late metastasis, tumor recurrence, or disease progression were seen in 1 patient (3.8%) with tumors initially classified as benign, 8 patients (11.1%) with uncertain tumors, and 15 patients (38.5%) with tumors classified as malignant (P < .001). Of the 39 patients with tumors 2 cm or smaller, 3 (7.7%) had late metastases or recurrence. When compared with patients with symptomatic, nonfunctioning PETs, no large difference was observed in tumor size, patient age, disease, or survival.

Conclusions: Incidentally detected, nonfunctioning PETs can display aggressive behavior, even when small. Although patients with malignant disease had diminished survival and increased rates of recurrence, benign histologic findings did not eliminate the possibility of progression. Patients with incidentally discovered, nonfunctioning PETs should undergo tumor resection and careful postoperative surveillance, even if surgical pathologic findings suggest benign disease.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Year of resection. The 2009 column includes those patients on whom operations were performed between January 31 and July 1 only.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall survival of patients after resection of an incidentally identified, nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumor (N=139). Crosshatch marks indicate date of censure.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overall survival stratified by histopathologic classification after resection of an incidentally identified, nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine tumor. Crosshatch marks indicate date of patient censure. The difference in survival between patients with benign (n=26) and malignant (n=39) lesions was statistically significant (P=.03), as was the difference between patients with uncertain (n=72) compared with benign lesions (P<.001). No significant difference in survival was found between patients with benign or uncertain lesions.
Figure 4
Figure 4
World Health Organization pathologic classification by tumor size. Number of tumors with each classification are shown for each size interval.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Overall survival from date of surgery comparing patients with incidentally identified lesions (n=139) with those with nonincidental lesions (n=30) (P=.27).

References

    1. Vagefi PA, Razo O, Deshpande V, et al. Evolving patterns in the detection and outcomes of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: the Massachusetts General Hospital experience from 1977 to 2005. Arch Surg. 2007;142(4):347–354.
    1. Ferrone CR, Correa-Gallego C, Warshaw AL, et al. Current trends in pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Arch Surg. 2009;144(5):448–454.
    1. Modlin IM, Moss SF, Chung DC, Jensen RT, Snyderwine E. Priorities for improving the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(18):1282–1289.
    1. Fendrich V, Waldmann J, Bartsch DK, Langer P. Surgical management of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2009;6(7):419–428.
    1. Balcom JH, IV, Rattner DW, Warshaw AL, Chang Y, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization. Arch Surg. 2001;136(4):391–398.
    1. Heitz PU, Komminoth P, Perrin A, et al. Pancreatic endocrine tumors: introduction. In: DeLellis DA, Lloyd RV, Heitz PU, et al., editors. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Endocrine Organs: WHO Classification of Tumours. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer Press; 2004. pp. 177–182.
    1. Mansour JC, Chen H. Pancreatic endocrine tumors. J Surg Res. 2004;120(1):139–161.
    1. Modlin IM, Lye KD, Kidd M. A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer. 2003;97(4):934–959.
    1. Fitzgerald TL, Hickner ZJ, Schmitz M, Kort EJ. Changing incidence of pancreatic neoplasms: a 16-year review of statewide tumor registry. Pancreas. 2008;37 (2):134–138.
    1. Grimelius L, Hultquist GT, Stenkvist B. Cytological differentiation of asymptomatic pancreatic islet cell tumours in autopsy material. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol. 1975;365(4):275–288.
    1. Klöppel G, Perren A, Heitz PU. The gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine cell system and its tumors: the WHO classification. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1014:13–27.
    1. Bilimoria KY, Talamonti MS, Tomlinson JS, et al. Prognostic score predicting survival after resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: analysis of 3851 patients. Ann Surg. 2008;247(3):490–500.
    1. Pape U-F, Jann H, Müller-Nordhorn J, et al. Prognostic relevance of a novel TNM classification system for upper gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer. 2008;113(2):256–265.
    1. Kouvaraki MA, Solorzano CC, Shapiro SE, et al. Surgical treatment of nonfunctioning pancreatic islet cell tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2005;89(3):170–185.
    1. You DD, Lee HG, Paik KY, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW. The outcomes after surgical resection in pancreatic endocrine tumors: an institutional experience. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(7):728–733.
    1. Hill JS, McPhee JT, McDade TP, et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: the impact of surgical resection on survival. Cancer. 2009;115(4):741–751.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner