Toward a functional analysis of self-injury

B A Iwata, M F Dorsey, K J Slifer, K E Bauman, G S Richman, B A Iwata, M F Dorsey, K J Slifer, K E Bauman, G S Richman

Abstract

This study describes the use of an operant methodology to assess functional relationships between self-injury and specific environmental events. The self-injurious behaviors of nine developmentally disabled subjects were observed during periods of brief, repeated exposure to a series of analogue conditions. Each condition differed along one or more of the following dimensions: (1) play materials (present vs absent), (2) experimenter demands (high vs low), and (3) social attention (absent vs noncontingent vs contingent). Results showed a great deal of both between and within-subject variability. However, in six of the nine subjects, higher levels of self-injury were consistently associated with a specific stimulus condition, suggesting that within-subject variability was a function of distinct features of the social and/or physical environment. These data are discussed in light of previously suggested hypotheses for the motivation of self-injury, with particular emphasis on their implications for the selection of suitable treatments.

References

    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Fall;1(3):201-11
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Summer;12(2):199-210
    1. Behav Res Ther. 1966 May;4(2):79-84
    1. Am J Ment Defic. 1976 Sep;81(2):147-53
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Fall;2(3):143-57
    1. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1976;4(2):139-53
    1. Behav Res Ther. 1975 Jun;13(2-3):101-11
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1970 Summer;3(2):111-6
    1. J Autism Child Schizophr. 1974 Sep;4(3):241-50
    1. J Pediatr Psychol. 1980 Jun;5(2):207-16
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Fall;10(3):415-24
    1. J Abnorm Psychol. 1972 Dec;80(3):211-24
    1. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1978 Sep;6(3):299-310
    1. Behav Res Ther. 1975 Jun;13(2-3):153-62
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Winter;7(4):557-63
    1. Am J Ment Defic. 1971 Nov;76(3):295-305
    1. Behav Res Ther. 1975 Jun;13(2-3):189-91
    1. Am J Ment Defic. 1976 Mar;80(5):512-22
    1. Am J Ment Defic. 1979 Sep;84(2):188-94
    1. Psychol Rep. 1976 Dec;39(3):843-9
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1975 Winter;8(4):463-9
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):21-34
    1. Behav Res Ther. 1967 May;5(2):103-11
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Fall;13(3):473-91
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Spring;13(1):65-75
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Summer;12(2):221-33
    1. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1975 Oct;43(5):730-9
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1975 Fall;8(3):301-9
    1. Behav Res Ther. 1973 Aug;11(3):351-6
    1. Psychol Bull. 1977 Jul;84(4):800-16
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1975 Spring;8(1):53-7
    1. J Ment Defic Res. 1975 Jun;19(2):107-12
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Fall;4(3):201-13
    1. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:225-32
    1. J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Summer;13(2):343-53

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner