Perspectives on male partner notification and treatment for syphilis among antenatal women and their partners in Kampala and Wakiso districts, Uganda

Edith Nakku-Joloba, Juliet Kiguli, Christine Nalwadda Kayemba, Adeline Twimukye, Joshua Kimeze Mbazira, Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi, Monica Birungi, Joshua Kyenkya, Josaphat Byamugisha, Charlotte Gaydos, Yukari C Manabe, Edith Nakku-Joloba, Juliet Kiguli, Christine Nalwadda Kayemba, Adeline Twimukye, Joshua Kimeze Mbazira, Rosalind Parkes-Ratanshi, Monica Birungi, Joshua Kyenkya, Josaphat Byamugisha, Charlotte Gaydos, Yukari C Manabe

Abstract

Background: Syphilis screening can be successfully integrated into antenatal clinics, and potentially avert significant morbidity and mortality to unborn infants. A minority of male partners report for testing and treatment, increasing the likelihood of reinfection. We conducted a qualitative study to understand factors influencing male partners to seek treatment after syphilis notification by their pregnant partners.

Methods: A purposeful sample of 54 adults who participated in the STOP (Syphilis Treatment of Partners) study was stratified by gender (24 women, 30 male partners) and enrolled for in-depth interviews which were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using the thematic approach.

Results: The participants' median age (IQR) was 32 years (25-44), 87% were married, and 57.4% (31/74) had attained secondary education. Fourteen of 22 (63%) female participants reported that they sometimes experienced domestic violence. Male participant's knowledge of syphilis and their perception of their valued role as responsible fathers of an unborn baby facilitated return. Female's fear of partner's violence and poor communication between partners, were barriers against delivery of the notification forms to partners and subsequent treatment of partners. For men, fear of injection pain, perceptions of syphilis as a genetic disease and as a woman's problem, busy work schedules, poor access to good STD services, shared facilities with women in clinics, as well as HIV-related stigma were important barrier factors.

Conclusions: The return to the clinic for treatment of male partners after partner notification by infected pregnant women, was low due to limited knowledge about syphilis, fear of painful injection, fears of domestic violence, lack of communication skills (individual characteristics) and syphilis disease characteristics such as signs and symptoms. This, combined with health services characteristics such as structural barriers that hinder male partner treatment, low access, low capacity, work/time challenges, inadequate laboratory services and low clinic personnel capacity; threatens efforts to eliminate mother-to-child infection of syphilis. Improved public messaging about syphilis, better services, legal and policy frameworks supporting STD notification and treatment in resource-constrained settings are needed for effective STD control.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02262390 ., Date Registered October 8 2014.

Keywords: Maternal syphilis; Partner notification; Resource constrained settings; Socio-cultural factors.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Joint Clinical Research Centre Institutional Review Board (IRB), the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (HS1681), Johns Hopkins IRB (NA_00012998 / CR00015330) and it was registered at Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

    1. Newman L, Kamb M, Hawkes S, et al. Global estimates of syphilis in pregnancy and associated adverse outcomes: analysis of multinational antenatal surveillance data. PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001396.
    1. Kuznik A, Habib AG, Manabe YC, Lamorde M. Estimating the public health burden associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes resulting from syphilis infection across 43 countries in sub-Saharan Africa. Sex Transm Dis. 2015;42(7):369–375. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000291.
    1. Gomez GB, Kamb ML, Newman LM, Mark J, Broutet N, Hawkes SJ. Untreated maternal syphilis and adverse outcomes of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(3):217–226. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.107623.
    1. WHO. Global Guidance on Criteria and Processes for Validation: Elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and syphilis. 2014 (accessed November 6 2014).
    1. Manabe YC, Namale G, Nalintya E, et al. Integration of antenatal syphilis screening in an urban HIV clinic: a feasibility study. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12879-014-0739-1.
    1. Kroeger A. Anthropological and socio-medical health care research in developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(3):147–161. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(83)90248-4.
    1. Alam N, Chamot E, Vermund SH, Streatfield K, Kristensen S. Partner notification for sexually transmitted infections in developing countries: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-19.
    1. Cavalcante EG, Miranda MC, Carvalho AZ, Lima IC, Galvao MT. Partner notification for sexually transmitted infections and perception of notified partners. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P. 2016;50(3):450–457. doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420160000400011.
    1. Decker MR, Miller E, McCauley HL, et al. Intimate partner violence and partner notification of sexually transmitted infections among adolescent and young adult family planning clinic patients. Int J STD AIDS. 2011;22(6):345–347. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2011.010425.
    1. Trelle S, Shang A, Nartey L, Cassell JA, Low N. Improved effectiveness of partner notification for patients with sexually transmitted infections: systematic review. bmj. 2007;334(7589):354. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39079.460741.7C.
    1. Hogben M, Collins D, Hoots B, O’Connor K. Partner services in STD prevention programs. A Review Sexually transmitted diseases. 2016;43(0 0 1):S53.
    1. Kunutsor S, Walley J, Katabira E, et al. Using mobile phones to improve clinic attendance amongst an antiretroviral treatment cohort in rural Uganda: a cross-sectional and prospective study. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(6):1347–1352. doi: 10.1007/s10461-010-9780-2.
    1. Moyo W, Chirenje Z, Mandel J, et al. Impact of a single session of counseling on partner referral for sexually transmitted disease treatment, Harare. Zimbabwe AIDS and Behavior. 2002;6(3):237–43.
    1. Muessig KE, Pike EC, LeGrand S, Hightow-Weidman LB. Mobile phone applications for the care and prevention of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases: a review. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(1).
    1. Control CD. Prevention. Recommendations for partner services programs for HIV infection, syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydial infection. MMWR Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report Recommendations and reports/Centers for Disease Control. 2008;57(RR-9):1.
    1. Neidl BF. Lesser of two evils: New York's new HIV/AIDS partner notification law and why the right of privacy must yield to public health. John's L Rev. 1999;73:1191.
    1. St. Lawrence JS, Montaño DE, Kasprzyk D, Phillips WR, Armstrong K, Leichliter JS. STD screening, testing, case reporting, and clinical and partner notification practices: a national survey of US physicians. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(11):1784–1788. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.92.11.1784.
    1. Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):37. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-37.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner