Use of a targeted, combinatorial next-generation sequencing approach for the study of bicuspid aortic valve

Elizabeth M Bonachea, Gloria Zender, Peter White, Don Corsmeier, David Newsom, Sara Fitzgerald-Butt, Vidu Garg, Kim L McBride, Elizabeth M Bonachea, Gloria Zender, Peter White, Don Corsmeier, David Newsom, Sara Fitzgerald-Butt, Vidu Garg, Kim L McBride

Abstract

Background: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common type of congenital heart disease with a population prevalence of 1-2%. While BAV is known to be highly heritable, mutations in single genes (such as GATA5 and NOTCH1) have been reported in few human BAV cases. Traditional gene sequencing methods are time and labor intensive, while next-generation high throughput sequencing remains costly for large patient cohorts and requires extensive bioinformatics processing. Here we describe an approach to targeted multi-gene sequencing with combinatorial pooling of samples from BAV patients.

Methods: We studied a previously described cohort of 78 unrelated subjects with echocardiogram-identified BAV. Subjects were identified as having isolated BAV or BAV associated with coarctation of aorta (BAV-CoA). BAV cusp fusion morphology was defined as right-left cusp fusion, right non-coronary cusp fusion, or left non-coronary cusp fusion. Samples were combined into 19 pools using a uniquely overlapping combinatorial design; a given mutation could be attributed to a single individual on the basis of which pools contained the mutation. A custom gene capture of 97 candidate genes was sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2000. Multistep bioinformatics processing was performed for base calling, variant identification, and in-silico analysis of putative disease-causing variants.

Results: Targeted capture identified 42 rare, non-synonymous, exonic variants involving 35 of the 97 candidate genes. Among these variants, in-silico analysis classified 33 of these variants as putative disease-causing changes. Sanger sequencing confirmed thirty-one of these variants, found among 16 individuals. There were no significant differences in variant burden among BAV fusion phenotypes or isolated BAV versus BAV-CoA. Pathway analysis suggests a role for the WNT signaling pathway in human BAV.

Conclusion: We successfully developed a pooling and targeted capture strategy that enabled rapid and cost effective next generation sequencing of target genes in a large patient cohort. This approach identified a large number of putative disease-causing variants in a cohort of patients with BAV, including variants in 26 genes not previously associated with human BAV. The data suggest that BAV heritability is complex and polygenic. Our pooling approach saved over $39,350 compared to an unpooled, targeted capture sequencing strategy.

References

    1. Ward C. Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve. Heart. 2000;83(1):81–85. doi: 10.1136/heart.83.1.81.
    1. Duran AC, Frescura C, Sans-Coma V, Angelini A, Basso C, Thiene G. Bicuspid aortic valves in hearts with other congenital heart disease. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995;4(6):581–590.
    1. Fernandes SM, Sanders SP, Khairy P, Jenkins KJ, Gauvreau K, Lang P, Simonds H, Colan SD. Morphology of bicuspid aortic valve in children and adolescents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(8):1648–1651. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.05.063.
    1. Clementi M, Notari L, Borghi A, Tenconi R. Familial congenital bicuspid aortic valve: a disorder of uncertain inheritance. Am J Med Genet. 1996;62(4):336–338. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960424)62:4<336::AID-AJMG2>;2-P.
    1. Cripe L, Andelfinger G, Martin LJ, Shooner K, Benson DW. Bicuspid aortic valve is heritable. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(1):138–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.050.
    1. Glick BN, Roberts WC. Congenitally bicuspid aortic valve in multiple family members. Am J Cardiol. 1994;73(5):400–404. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90018-3.
    1. Huntington K, Hunter AG, Chan KL. A prospective study to assess the frequency of familial clustering of congenital bicuspid aortic valve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30(7):1809–1812. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00372-0.
    1. Bonachea EM, Chang SW, Zender G, Lahaye S, Fitzgerald-Butt S, McBride KL, Garg V. GATA5 Sequence Variants Identified in Individuals with Bicuspid Aortic Valve. Pediatr Res. 2014;76(2):211–6. doi: 10.1038/pr.2014.67.
    1. Foffa I, Ait Ali L, Panesi P, Mariani M, Festa P, Botto N, Vecoli C, Andreassi MG. Sequencing of NOTCH1, GATA5, TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 genes in familial cases of bicuspid aortic valve. BMC Med Genet. 2013;14:44.
    1. Garg V, Muth AN, Ransom JF, Schluterman MK, Barnes R, King IN, Grossfeld PD, Srivastava D. Mutations in NOTCH1 cause aortic valve disease. Nature. 2005;437(7056):270–274. doi: 10.1038/nature03940.
    1. McBride KL, Riley MF, Zender GA, Fitzgerald-Butt SM, Towbin JA, Belmont JW, Cole SE. NOTCH1 mutations in individuals with left ventricular outflow tract malformations reduce ligand-induced signaling. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17(18):2886–2893. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn187.
    1. Mohamed SA, Aherrahrou Z, Liptau H, Erasmi AW, Hagemann C, Wrobel S, Borzym K, Schunkert H, Sievers HH, Erdmann J. Novel missense mutations (p.T596M and p.P1797H) in NOTCH1 in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2006;345(4):1460–1465. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.05.046.
    1. Padang R, Bagnall RD, Richmond DR, Bannon PG, Semsarian C. Rare non-synonymous variations in the transcriptional activation domains of GATA5 in bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;53(2):277–281. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.05.009.
    1. Shi LM, Tao JW, Qiu XB, Wang J, Yuan F, Xu L, Liu H, Li RG, Xu YJ, Wang Q, Zheng HZ, Li X, Wang XZ, Zhang M, Qu XK, Yang YQ. GATA5 loss-of-function mutations associated with congenital bicuspid aortic valve. Int J Mol Med. 2014;33(5):1219–1226.
    1. Fernandez B, Duran AC, Fernandez-Gallego T, Fernandez MC, Such M, Arque JM, Sans-Coma V. Bicuspid aortic valves with different spatial orientations of the leaflets are distinct etiological entities. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(24):2312–2318. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.07.044.
    1. Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, Goldstein DB, Hindorff LA, Hunter DJ, McCarthy MI, Ramos EM, Cardon LR, Chakravarti A, Cho JH, Guttmacher AE, Kong A, Kruglyak L, Mardis E, Rotimi CN, Slatkin M, Valle D, Whittemore AS, Boehnke M, Clark AG, Eichler EE, Gibson G, Haines JL, Mackay TF, McCarroll SA, Visscher PM. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature. 2009;461(7265):747–753. doi: 10.1038/nature08494.
    1. Iyengar SK, Elston RC. The genetic basis of complex traits: rare variants or “common gene, common disease”? Methods Mol Biol. 2007;376:71–84. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-389-9_6.
    1. Visscher PM, Brown MA, McCarthy MI, Yang J. Five years of GWAS discovery. Am J Hum Genet. 2012;90(1):7–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.11.029.
    1. Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies - the next generation. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11(1):31–46. doi: 10.1038/nrg2626.
    1. Kim SY, Li Y, Guo Y, Li R, Holmkvist J, Hansen T, Pedersen O, Wang J, Nielsen R. Design of association studies with pooled or un-pooled next-generation sequencing data. Genet Epidemiol. 2010;34(5):479–491. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20501.
    1. Erlich Y, Chang K, Gordon A, Ronen R, Navon O, Rooks M, Hannon GJ. DNA Sudoku–harnessing high-throughput sequencing for multiplexed specimen analysis. Genome Res. 2009;19(7):1243–1253. doi: 10.1101/gr.092957.109.
    1. Prabhu S, Pe'er I. Overlapping pools for high-throughput targeted resequencing. Genome Res. 2009;19(7):1254–1261. doi: 10.1101/gr.088559.108.
    1. Calloway TJ, Martin LJ, Zhang X, Tandon A, Benson DW, Hinton RB. Risk factors for aortic valve disease in bicuspid aortic valve: a family-based study. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A(5):1015–1020.
    1. Robledo-Carmona J, Rodriguez-Bailon I, Carrasco-Chinchilla F, Fernandez B, Jimenez-Navarro M, Porras-Martin C, Montiel-Trujillo A, Garcia-Pinilla JM, Such-Martinez M, De Teresa-Galvan E. Hereditary patterns of bicuspid aortic valve in a hundred families. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(4):3443–3449. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.04.180.
    1. McBride KL, Ware SM. Modifying Mendel: approaches for identification of susceptibility alleles for human cardiovascular malformations. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2012;5(3):274–276. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.112.963579.
    1. Alfieri CM, Cheek J, Chakraborty S, Yutzey KE. Wnt signaling in heart valve development and osteogenic gene induction. Dev Biol. 2010;338(2):127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.11.030.
    1. Tzahor E. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and cardiogenesis: timing does matter. Dev Cell. 2007;13(1):10–13. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2007.06.006.
    1. Robasky K, Lewis NE, Church GM. The role of replicates for error mitigation in next-generation sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15(1):56–62.
    1. Kircher M, Sawyer S, Meyer M. Double indexing overcomes inaccuracies in multiplex sequencing on the Illumina platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(1):e3. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr771.
    1. Abecasis GR, Auton A, Brooks LD, DePristo MA, Durbin RM, Handsaker RE, Kang HM, Marth GT, McVean GA. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature. 2012;491(7422):56–65. doi: 10.1038/nature11632.
    1. NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ESP) Exome Variant Server. [ ]
    1. da Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protocol. 2009;4(1):44–57.
    1. da Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(1):1–13. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn923.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner