Is care based on comprehensive geriatric assessment with mobile teams better than usual care? A study protocol of a randomised controlled trial (The GerMoT study)

Anne Wissendorff Ekdahl, Anna Axmon, Magnus Sandberg, Katarina Steen Carlsson, Anne Wissendorff Ekdahl, Anna Axmon, Magnus Sandberg, Katarina Steen Carlsson

Abstract

Introduction: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a multidimensional, interdisciplinary diagnostic process used to determine the medical, psychological and functional capabilities of frail older people. The primary aim of our current study is to confirm whether CGA-based outpatient care is superior than usual care in terms of health-related outcomes, resource use and costs.

Methods and analysis: The Geriatric Mobile Team trial is designed as a single-centre randomised, controlled, assessor-blinded (at baseline) trial. All participants will be identified via local healthcare registries with the following inclusion criteria: age ≥75 years, ≥3 different diagnoses and ≥3 visits to the emergency care unit (with or without admittance to hospital) during the past 18 months. Nursing home residency will be an exclusion criterion. Baseline assessments will be done before the 1:1 randomisation. Participants in the intervention group will, after an initial CGA, have access to care given by a geriatric team in addition to usual care. The control group receives usual care only. The primary outcome is the total number of inpatient days during the follow-up period. Assessments of the outcomes: mortality, quality of life, health care use, physical functional level, frailty, dependence and cognition will be performed 12 and 24 months after inclusion. Both descriptive and analytical statistics will be used, in order to compare groups and for analyses of outcomes over time including changes therein. The primary outcome will be analysed using analysis of variance, including in-transformed values if needed to achieve normal distribution of the residuals.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval has been obtained and the results will be disseminated in national and international journals and to health care leaders and stakeholders. Protocol amendments will be published in ClinicalTrials.gov as amendments to the initial registration NCT02923843. In case of success, the study will promote the implementation of CGA in outpatient care settings and thereby contribute to an improved care of older people with multimorbidity through dissemination of the results through scientific articles, information to politicians and to the public.

Trial registration number: NCT02923843; Pre-results.

Keywords: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment; Frailty; Geriatric Medicine; Out-patient Care; Randomised Controlled Trial.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. World Health Organisation, 2015. WHO world report on Ageing 2015.
    1. Ekerstad N, Edberg A, Carlsson P. Characteristics of multiple-diseased elderly in Swedish hospital care and clinical guidelines: do they make evidence-based priority setting a “mission impossible”? International Journal of Ageing and Later Life 2009;3:71–95. 10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.083271
    1. Ellis G, Whitehead M, O’Neill D, et al. . Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: The Cochrane Library, 2011.
    1. Stuck AE, Siu AL, Wieland GD, et al. . Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials. Lancet 1993;342:1032–6. 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-V
    1. Thomas EJ, Brennan TA. Incidence and types of preventable adverse events in elderly patients: population based review of medical records. BMJ 2000;320:741–4. 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.741
    1. Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR, Wieland GD, et al. . Effectiveness of a geriatric evaluation unit. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 1984;311:1664–70. 10.1056/NEJM198412273112604
    1. Ellis G, Langhorne P. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older hospital patients. Br Med Bull 2004;71:45–59. 10.1093/bmb/ldh033
    1. Baztán JJ, Suárez-García FM, López-Arrieta J, et al. . Effectiveness of acute geriatric units on functional decline, living at home, and case fatality among older patients admitted to hospital for acute medical disorders: meta-analysis. BMJ 2009;338:b50 10.1136/bmj.b50
    1. Boult C, Boult LB, Morishita L, et al. . A randomized clinical trial of outpatient geriatric evaluation and management. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:351–9. 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49076.x
    1. Ekdahl AW, Wirehn AB, Alwin J, et al. . Costs and effects of an ambulatory geriatric unit (the AGe-FIT Study): a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015;16:497–503. 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.01.074
    1. Ekdahl AW, Alwin J, Eckerblad J, et al. . Long-term evaluation of the Ambulatory Geriatric Assessment: A Frailty Intervention Trial (AGe-FIT): clinical outcomes and total costs after 36 months. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016;17:263–8. 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.12.008
    1. Mazya AL, Garvin P, Ekdahl AW. Outpatient comprehensive geriatric assessment: effects on frailty and mortality in old people with multimorbidity and high health care utilization. Aging Clin Exp Res. In Press 2018. 10.1007/s40520-018-1004-z
    1. Pacala J. Prevention of iatrogenic complications in the elderly, 2013.
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. . SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
    1. Patientadministrative System of Skane - PASIS.
    1. Swedish registry of social care act desicions.
    1. Ekdahl AW, Odzakovic E, Hellström I. Living unnoticed: cognitive impairment in older people with multimorbidity. J Nutr Health Aging 2016;20:1–5. 10.1007/s12603-015-0580-2
    1. EuroQol Group. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199–208. 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
    1. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, et al. . Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000;55:M221–M231. 10.1093/gerona/55.4.M221
    1. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. . Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56:M146–M157. 10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146
    1. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, et al. . A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ 2005;173:489–95. 10.1503/cmaj.050051
    1. Asberg KH, Sonn U. The cumulative structure of personal and instrumental ADL. A study of elderly people in a health service district. Scand J Rehabil Med 1989;21:171-7.
    1. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. . The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:695–9. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner