Evaluation of Mental Health First Aid from the Perspective Of Workplace End UseRs-EMPOWER: protocol of cluster randomised trial phase

Opeyemi Atanda, Patrick Callaghan, Tim Carter, Graham Durcan, Nick O'Shea, Steve D Brown, Paula Reavey, Eleni Vangeli, Sarah White, Kerry V Wood, Opeyemi Atanda, Patrick Callaghan, Tim Carter, Graham Durcan, Nick O'Shea, Steve D Brown, Paula Reavey, Eleni Vangeli, Sarah White, Kerry V Wood

Abstract

Background: Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) is a mental health intervention that teaches people how to identify, understand and help someone who may be experiencing a mental health issue. Reviews of the implementation of MHFA found between 68 and 88% of trained Mental Health First Aiders had used their skills when in contact with someone experiencing mental health difficulties. Reviews evaluating the impact of MHFA suggest positive outcomes. However, to date, there has been no systematic, rigorous evaluation of the impact of MHFA on recipients of the intervention, the organisations providing it and the cost-effectiveness of MHFA overall. This trial will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MHFA.

Methods: The study is a multi-centred, two-arm clustered randomised controlled trial. Organisations will be randomly allocated to the control or intervention (estimated sample size 800 recipients). The intervention is the standard MHFA intervention provided by Mental Health First Aid England (MHFAE). The control condition will be organisations having a brief consultation from MHFAE on promoting mental health and well-being in the workplace. The primary outcome is health seeking behaviour, measured using the Actual Help Seeking Questionnaire, at 6 months' follow-up. Data collection will be undertaken at baseline (T0), post-intervention-up to 3 months (T1), at 6 months (T2), 12 months (T3) and 24 months (T4). The primary analysis will be conducted on those participants who receive MHFA, a per protocol analysis.

Discussion: The study is the first to evaluate the effect of MHFA in the workplace on employees with direct and indirect experience of the intervention, when compared with usual practice. Being also the first to assess, systematically, the social impact of MHFA and investigate its cost-effectiveness adds to the originality of the study. The study promises to yield important data, as yet unknown, regarding the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, implementation issues, and the sustainability of MHFA in the workplace.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04311203 . Registered on 17 March 2020.

Keywords: Economic evaluation; Help seeking behaviours; Mental health first aid; Process evaluation; Workplace.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT trial flow diagram

References

    1. Morgan AJ, Ross A, Reavley A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of mental health first aid training: effects on knowledge, stigma, and helping behaviour. PLoS One. 2018; 10.1371/journal.pone.0197102.
    1. Hadlaczky G, Hökby S, Mkrtchian A, Carli V, Wasserman D. Mental Health First Aid is an effective public health intervention for improving knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: a meta-analysis. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014. 10.3109/09540261.2014.924910.
    1. Jorm AF, Kitchener BA, Sawyer MG, Scales H, Cvetkovski S. Mental health first aid training for high school teachers: a cluster randomized trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2010. 10.1186/1471-244X-10-51.
    1. Kitchener BA, Jorm AF. Mental health first aid training for the public: evaluation of effects on knowledge, attitudes and helping behaviour. BMC Psychiatry. 2002; 10.1186/1471-244X-2-10.
    1. Brett-Jones J. NHS Camden. 2010. NHS Camden Mental Health First Aid programme review.
    1. Heer B. Mental Health First Aid training evaluation. 2010.
    1. MacDonald KM, Cosquer C, Flockton A. An evaluation of the impact of MHFA Training in Kingston upon Hull. 2008.
    1. De Graaf R, Tuithof M, Van Dorsselaer S, Ten Have M. Comparing the effects on work performance of mental and physical disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012;2012 10.1007/s00127-012-0496-7.
    1. Narayanasamy M, Geraghty J, Coole C, Nouri F, Callaghan P, Drummlond A. Mental health first aid in the workplace (MENTOR): A feasibility study. 2018. pp. 1–99.
    1. Bovopoulos N, LaMontagne AD, Martin A, Jorm AF. Exploring the role of mental health first aid officers in workplaces: a qualitative study using case study methodology. Int J Workplace Health Manag 2018; 10.1108/IJWHM-06-2018-0082 LK - .
    1. Rickwood D, Deane FP, Wilson CJ, Ciarrochi JV. Young people’s help-seeking for mental health problems. Austr e-Journal Adv Mental Health. 2005;4:1–34. doi: 10.5172/jamh.4.1.1.
    1. Wilson CJ, Deane FP, Ciarrochi J, Rickwood D. Measuring help-seeking intentions: properties of general help seeking questionnaire. Can J Couns. 2005;39:15–28.
    1. Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, et al. The Warwick-Edinburgh mental well-being scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63.
    1. O’Connor M, Casey L. The Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS): a new scale-based measure of mental health literacy. Psychiatry Res. 2015;229:511–516. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.064.
    1. Kelly CM, Mitchen JM, Fischer JA, Kitchener BA, Jorm AF, Lowe A, Scanlan C. Youth mental health first aid: a description of the program and an initial evaluation. Int J Ment Heal Syst. 2011; 10.1186/1752-4458-5-4.
    1. Ware JE, Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220–233. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
    1. Moore CD, Schofield C, van Rooyen DRM, Andersson LMC. Development and preliminary validation of a scale to measure self-efficacy in seeking mental health care (SE-SMHC). Springer Plus. 2015. 10.1186/s40064-015-1109-1.
    1. Umubyeyi A, Mogren I, Ntaganira J, Krantz G. Help-seeking behaviours, barriers to care and self-efficacy for seeking mental health care: a population-based study in Rwanda. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016. 10.1007/s00127-015-1130-2.
    1. Keyes CLM. Social well-being. Soc Psychol Q. 1998;61:121–140. doi: 10.2307/2787065.
    1. Beecham J, Knapp M. Costing psychiatric interventions. Thornicroft G, ed. Measuring mental health needs. 2nd ed. London: Gaskell; 2001.
    1. Campbell M, Grimshaw J, Steen N. Sample size calculations for cluster randomised trials. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000;5(1):12–16. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500105.
    1. Ward M, Rhodes C. Small businesses and the UK economy. UK: House of commons Library; 2014.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner