Integrated Knowledge Translation and Grant Development: Addressing the Research Practice Gap through Stakeholder-informed Research

Joanna Henderson, Elizabeth Brownlie, Susan Rosenkranz, Gloria Chaim, Joseph Beitchman, Joanna Henderson, Elizabeth Brownlie, Susan Rosenkranz, Gloria Chaim, Joseph Beitchman

Abstract

Objective: We describe our stakeholder engagement process for grant application development that occurred as part of our integrated knowledge translation plan and make recommendations for researchers.

Method: In phase 1, a stakeholder consultation group was developed. In phase 2, surveys regarding knowledge gathering, research agenda, and research collaboration preferences were sent to 333 cross-sectoral youth-serving organizations in Ontario, including family and consumer organizations.

Results: In phase 1, 28 stakeholders from six sectors participated in the consultation group and provided input on multiple aspects of the proposal. Through this process, 19 stakeholders adopted formal roles within the project. In phase 2, 206 surveys were received (response rate = 62%). Survey responses supported the grant focus (concurrent youth mental health and substance use problems). Respondents also prioritized project goals and provided specific feedback on research and knowledge translation. Finally, although some stakeholders chose greater involvement, most survey respondents indicated a preference for a moderate level of participation in research rather than full team membership.

Conclusions: Despite short timelines and feasibility challenges, stakeholders can be meaningfully engaged in and contribute to the grant proposal development process. Consideration is needed for the practical challenges that stakeholder organizations face in supporting and participating in research.

Keywords: grant proposal development; integrated knowledge translation; knowledge exchange; researcher-stakeholder collaboration; youth concurrent disorders.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner