A direct assessment of "obesogenic" built environments: challenges and recommendations

Danijela Gasevic, Ina Vukmirovich, Salim Yusuf, Koon Teo, Clara Chow, Gilles Dagenais, Scott A Lear, Danijela Gasevic, Ina Vukmirovich, Salim Yusuf, Koon Teo, Clara Chow, Gilles Dagenais, Scott A Lear

Abstract

This paper outlines the challenges faced during direct built environment (BE) assessments of 42 Canadian communities of various income and urbanization levels. In addition, we recommend options for overcoming such challenges during BE community assessments. Direct BE assessments were performed utilizing two distinct audit methods: (1) modified version of Irvine-Minnesota Inventory in which a paper version of an audit tool was used to assess BE features and (2) a Physical Activity and Nutrition Features audit tool, where the presence and positions of all environmental features of interest were recorded using a Global-Positioning-System (GPS) unit. This paper responds to the call for the need of creators and users of environmental audit tools to share experiences regarding the usability of tools for BE assessments. The outlined BE assessment challenges plus recommendations for overcoming them can help improve and refine the existing audit tools and aid researchers in future assessments of the BE.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
GPS waypoint icons and tracks after uploading into MapSource.

References

    1. Ezzati M, Lopez AD, Rodgers A, Vander Hoorn S, Murray CJL. Selected major risk factors and global and regional burden of disease. Lancet. 2002;360(9343):1347–1360.
    1. Hill JO, Peters JC. Environmental contributions to the obesity epidemic. Science. 1998;280(5368):1371–1374.
    1. Papas MA, Alberg AJ, Ewing R, Helzlsouer KJ, Gary TL, Klassen AC. The built environment and obesity. Epidemiologic Reviews. 2007;127(1):129–143.
    1. Booth KM, Pinkston MM, Poston WSC. Obesity and the built environment. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2005;105(5, supplement 1):S110–S117.
    1. Cohen DA. Obesity and the built environment: changes in environmental cues cause energy imbalances. International Journal of Obesity. 2008;32(7):S137–S142.
    1. Boone JE, Gordon-Larsen P, Stewart JD, Popkin BM. Validation of a GIS facilities database: quantification and implications of error. Annals of Epidemiology. 2008;18(5):371–377.
    1. Day K, Boarnet M, Alfonzo M, Forsyth A. The Irvine-Minnesota inventory to measure built environments: development. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2006;30(2):144–152.
    1. Pikora TJ, Bull FCL, Jamrozik K, Knuiman M, Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2002;23(3):187–194.
    1. Emery J, Crump C, Bors P. Reliability and validity of two instruments designed to assess the walking and bicycling suitability of sidewalks and roads. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2003;18(1):38–46.
    1. Dunstan F, Weaver N, Araya R, et al. An observation tool to assist with the assessment of urban residential environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2005;25(3):293–305.
    1. Lee RE, Booth KM, Reese-Smith JY, Regan G, Howard HH. The Physical Activity Resource Assessment (PARA) instrument: evaluating features, amenities and incivilities of physical activity resources in urban neighborhoods. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2005;2, article no. 13
    1. Ewing R, Handy S, Brownson RC, Clemente O, Winston E. Identifying and measuring urban design qualities related to walkability. Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2006;3(1, supplement):S223–S240.
    1. Clifton KJ, Livi Smith AD, Rodriguez D. The development and testing of an audit for the pedestrian environment. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2007;80(1-2):95–110.
    1. Millington C, Thompson CW, Rowe D, et al. Development of the Scottish Walkability Asessment Tool (SWAT) Health and Place. 2009;15:474–481.
    1. Cunningham GO, Michael YL, Farquhar SA, Lapidus J. Developing a reliable senior walking environmental assessment tool. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005;29(3):215–217.
    1. Spivock M, Gauvin L, Brodeur JM. Neighborhood-Level Active Living Buoys for Individuals with Physical Disabilities. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2007;32(3):224–230.
    1. Williams JE, Evans M, Kirtland KA, et al. Development and use of a tool for assessing sidewalk maintenance as an environmental support of physical activity. Health Promotion Practice. 2005;6(1):81–88.
    1. Cerin E, Chan K-W, Macfarlane DJ, Lee K-Y, Lai P-C. Objective assessment of walking environments in ultra-dense cities: development and reliability of the Environment in Asia Scan Tool-Hong Kong version (EAST-HK) Health and Place. 2011;17(4):937–945.
    1. Boarnet MG, Forsyth A, Day K, Oaks M. The street level built environment and physical activity and walking: results of a predictive validity study for the Irvine Minnesota Inventory. Environment and Behavior. 2011, .
    1. Yousefian A, Hennessy E, Umstattd MR, et al. Development of the rural active living assessment tools: measuring rural environments. Preventive Medicine. 2010;50:S86–S92.
    1. Forsyth A, Jacobson J, Thering K. Six assessments of the same places: comparing views of urban design. Journal of Urban Design. 2010;15(1):21–48.
    1. Teo K, Chow CK, Vaz M, Rangarajan S, Yusuf S. The Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study: examining the impact of societal influences on chronic noncommunicable diseases in low-, middle-, and high-income countries. American Heart Journal. 2009;158(1):1–7.
    1. Google Maps. Maps of Vancouver, Canada
    1. Day K. Audit tools for research on built environment features tied to active living. 2011, .
    1. Statistics Canada. North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 2011, .
    1. Proffitt DR, Stefanucci J, Banton T, Epstein W. The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychological Science. 2003;14(2):106–112.
    1. Proffit DR, Bhalla M, Gossweiler R, Midget J. Perceiving geographical slant. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 1995;2(4):409–428.
    1. Sallis JF, Owen N, Fotheringham MJ. Behavioral epidemiology: a systematic framework to classify phases of research on health promotion and disease prevention. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2000;22(4):294–298.
    1. McKinnon RA, Reedy J, Handy SL, Rodgers AB. Measuring the food and physical activity environments. Shaping the research agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2009;36(4):S81–S85.
    1. Ball K, Timperio AF, Crawford DA. Understanding environmental influences on nutrition and physical activity behaviors: where should we look and what should we count? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2006;3, article no. 33
    1. Saelens BE, Glanz K. Work Group I: measures of the food and physical activity environment. instruments. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2009;36(4):S166–S170.
    1. Schaefer-McDaniel N, O’Brien Caughy M, O’Campo P, Gearey W. Examining methodological details of neighbourhood observations and the relationship to health: a literature review. Social Science and Medicine. 2010;70(2):277–292.
    1. Brownson RC, Hoehner CM, Day K, Forsyth A, Sallis JF. Measuring the Built Environment for Physical Activity. State of the Science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2009;36(4):S99–S123.
    1. Caughy MO, O’Campo PJ, Patterson J. A brief observational measure for urban neighborhoods. Health and Place. 2001;7(3):225–236.
    1. Boarnet MG, Day K, Alfonzo M, Forsyth A, Oakes M. The Irvine-Minnesota inventory to measure built environments: reliability tests. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2006;30(2):153–159.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner