Environmental Profile of a Community's Health (EPOCH): an ecometric assessment of measures of the community environment based on individual perception

Daniel J Corsi, S V Subramanian, Martin McKee, Wei Li, Sumathi Swaminathan, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo, Alvaro Avezum, Scott A Lear, Gilles Dagenais, Sumathy Rangarajan, Koon Teo, Salim Yusuf, Clara K Chow, Daniel J Corsi, S V Subramanian, Martin McKee, Wei Li, Sumathi Swaminathan, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo, Alvaro Avezum, Scott A Lear, Gilles Dagenais, Sumathy Rangarajan, Koon Teo, Salim Yusuf, Clara K Chow

Abstract

Background: Public health research has turned towards examining upstream, community-level determinants of cardiovascular disease risk factors. Objective measures of the environment, such as those derived from direct observation, and perception-based measures by residents have both been associated with health behaviours. However, current methods are generally limited to objective measures, often derived from administrative data, and few instruments have been evaluated for use in rural areas or in low-income countries. We evaluate the reliability of a quantitative tool designed to capture perceptions of community tobacco, nutrition, and social environments obtained from interviews with residents in communities in 5 countries.

Methodology/ principal findings: Thirteen measures of the community environment were developed from responses to questionnaire items from 2,360 individuals residing in 84 urban and rural communities in 5 countries (China, India, Brazil, Colombia, and Canada) in the Environmental Profile of a Community's Health (EPOCH) study. Reliability and other properties of the community-level measures were assessed using multilevel models. High reliability (>0.80) was demonstrated for all community-level measures at the mean number of survey respondents per community (n = 28 respondents). Questionnaire items included in each scale were found to represent a common latent factor at the community level in multilevel factor analysis models.

Conclusions/ significance: Reliable measures which represent aspects of communities potentially related to cardiovascular disease (CVD)/risk factors can be obtained using feasible sample sizes. The EPOCH instrument is suitable for use in different settings to explore upstream determinants of CVD/risk factors.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1. Association between sample size of…
Figure 1. Association between sample size of respondents per community and reliabilities of community-level measures derived from EPOCH 2, overall and in urban and rural communities.
In each panel, the measures with the lowest and highest levels of interrater agreement are plotted; all other measures will lie between these two curves.

References

    1. Kawachi I, Berkman LF (2003) Neighborhoods and health. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
    1. Chow CK, Lock K, Teo K, Subramanian SV, McKee M, et al. (2009) Environmental and societal influences acting on cardiovascular risk factors and disease at a population level: a review. Int J Epidemiol 38: 1580–1594.
    1. Smedslund G, Fisher KJ, Boles SM, Lichtenstein E (2004) The effectiveness of workplace smoking cessation programmes: a meta-analysis of recent studies. Tob Control 13: 197–204.
    1. Thomson G, Wilson N (2006) One year of smokefree bars and restaurants in New Zealand: impacts and responses. BMC Public Health 6: 64.
    1. Eriksen MP (1999) Social forces and tobacco in society. Nicotine Tob Res 1 Suppl 1: S79–80.
    1. Chow CK, Lock K, Madhavan M, Corsi DJ, Gilmore AB, et al. (2010) Environmental Profile of a Community's Health (EPOCH): an instrument to measure environmental determinants of cardiovascular health in five countries. PLoS One 5: e14294.
    1. Giles-Corti B, Timperio A, Bull F, Pikora T (2005) Understanding physical activity environmental correlates: increased specificity for ecological models. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 33: 175–181.
    1. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD (2003) Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med 25: 80–91.
    1. Raudenbush SW, Sampson RJ (1999) Ecometrics: Toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with applicaiton to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Social Methodology 29: 1–41.
    1. Brownson RC, Hoehner CM, Day K, Forsyth A, Sallis JF (2009) Measuring the built environment for physical activity: state of the science. Am J Prev Med 36: S99–123 e112.
    1. Day K, Boarnet M, Alfonzo M, Forsyth A (2006) The Irvine-Minnesota inventory to measure built environments: development. Am J Prev Med 30: 144–152.
    1. Raudenbush SW (2003) The quantitative assessment of neighborhood social environments. In: Kawachi I, Berkman LF, editors. Neighborhoods and health. New York: Oxford University Press.
    1. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F (1997) Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277: 918–924.
    1. Teo K, Chow CK, Vaz M, Rangarajan S, Yusuf S (2009) The Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study: examining the impact of societal influences on chronic noncommunicable diseases in low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Am Heart J 158: 1–7 e1.
    1. Yusuf S, Islam S, Chow CK, Rangarajan S, Dagenais G, et al. (2011) Use of secondary prevention drugs for cardiovascular disease in the community in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (the PURE Study): a prospective epidemiological survey. Lancet 378: 1231–1243.
    1. Subramanian SV, Jones K, Duncan C (2003) Multilevel methods for public health research. In: Kawachi I, Berkman LF, editors. Neighborhoods and Health. New York: Oxford University Press.
    1. Browne WJ (2012) MCMC Estimation in MLwiN, v2.25. University of Bristol: Centre for Multilevel Modelling.
    1. Rasbash J, Browne WJ, Healy M, Cameron B, Charlton C (2010) MLwiN Version 2.20. Bristol, UK: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
    1. Leckie G, Charlton C (2011) runmlwin: Stata module for fitting multilevel models in the MLwiN software package Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol.
    1. Rodriguez G, Goldman N (1995) An assessment of estimation procedures for multilevel models with binary responses. J R Stat Soc A 158: 73–90.
    1. Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner