A phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation trial of oral TSR-011 in patients with advanced solid tumours and lymphomas

Chia-Chi Lin, Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau, Sharon Lu, Jasgit Sachdev, Javier de Castro Carpeño, Monica Mita, Rafal Dziadziuszko, Wu-Chou Su, Dmitri Bobilev, Lorraine Hughes, Jian Chan, Zhi-Yi Zhang, Glen J Weiss, Chia-Chi Lin, Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau, Sharon Lu, Jasgit Sachdev, Javier de Castro Carpeño, Monica Mita, Rafal Dziadziuszko, Wu-Chou Su, Dmitri Bobilev, Lorraine Hughes, Jian Chan, Zhi-Yi Zhang, Glen J Weiss

Abstract

Background: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements are oncogenic drivers in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). TSR-011 is a dual ALK and tropomyosin-related kinase (TRK) inhibitor, active against ALK inhibitor resistant tumours in preclinical studies. Here, we report the safety, tolerability and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of TSR-011 in patients with relapsed or refractory ALK- and TRK-positive advanced cancers.

Methods: In this sequential, open-label, phase 1 trial (NCT02048488), patients received doses of 30 mg, escalated to 480 mg every 24 hours (Q24h), followed by an expansion cohort of patients with ALK-positive cancers. The primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics.

Results: TSR-011 320- and 480-mg Q24h doses exceeded the maximum tolerated dose. At the RP2D of 40 mg every 8 hours (Q8h), the most common grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 3.2-6.5% of patients. Of 14 ALK inhibitor-naive patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, 6 experienced partial responses and 8 had stable disease.

Conclusions: At the RP2D (40 mg Q8h), TSR-011 demonstrated a favourable safety profile with acceptable QTc changes. Limited clinical activity was observed. Based on the competitive ALK inhibitor landscape and benefit/risk considerations, further TSR-011 development was discontinued.

Clinical trial registration number: NCT02048488.

Conflict of interest statement

C.-C.L., H.-T.A., M.M. and W.-C.S. declare no conflict of interest. J.S. reports advisory board, consulting, travel support and grant funding for investigator-initiated trials from Celgene, drug support for investigator-initiated trials from Genentech, funding for investigator-initiated trials from Pfizer and advisory board and consulting fees from TapImmune. J.d.C.C. reports advisory fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and Takeda. R.D. reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche. G.J.W. reports ownership interest from Circulogene, personal fees from Circulogene, GLG Council, Guidepoint Global, IDEA Pharma, Ignyta, Paradigm, Pfizer, Angiex, Imaging Endpoints, Spring Bank Pharmaceuticals, and IBEX Medical Analytics, travel and lodging fees from Cambridge Healthtech Institute, GlaxoSmithKline, and TESARO, and holds a patent (PCT/US2014/8911940) outside the submitted work. S.L., D.B., L.H., J.C. and Z.-Y.Z. are employees and stockholders of TESARO: A GSK Company.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean ± SEM plasma concentration–time profiles (semi-log) of TSR-011 following single oral daily doses in patients with cancer. a Cycle 1/day 1. b Cycle 2/day 1. Summary of ΔQTcF by plasma concentration and dose. c PK concentration–response (PK-QT) relationship from all dose groups (30 mg QD, 60 mg QD, 80 mg QD, 120 mg QD, 240 mg QD, 320 mg QD, 480 mg QD, 30 mg Q12h, 20 mg Q8h, 60 mg Q12h, 40 mg Q8h and 30 mg QD controlled release). d Plot of dose and regimen versus mean ΔQTcF (ms) from baseline with 90% CI. ΔQTcF change in Fridericia-corrected QT interval, CI confidence interval, Conc concentration, IR immediate release, PK pharmacokinetics, Q8h once every 8 hours, Q12h once every 12 hours, QD once daily, SEM standard error of the mean

References

    1. Lin JJ, Riely GJ, Shaw AT. Targeting ALK: precision medicine takes on drug resistance. Cancer Disco. 2017;7:137–155. doi: 10.1158/-16-1123.
    1. Soda M, Takada S, Takeuchi K, Choi YL, Enomoto M, Ueno T, et al. A mouse model for EML4-ALK-positive lung cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:19893–19897. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0805381105.
    1. Armstrong F, Duplantier MM, Trempat P, Hieblot C, Lamant L, Espinos E, et al. Differential effects of X-ALK fusion proteins on proliferation, transformation, and invasion properties of NIH3T3 cells. Oncogene. 2004;23:6071–6082. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207813.
    1. Sasaki T, Rodig SJ, Chirieac LR, Jänne PA. The biology and treatment of EML4-ALK non-small cell lung cancer. Eur. J. Cancer. 2010;46:1773–1780. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.04.002.
    1. FDA CenterWatch. FDA Approved Drugs for Oncology. (accessed 25 Jan, 2019) (2019).
    1. Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim DW, Wu YL, Nakagawa K, Mekhail T, et al. First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;371:2167–2177. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408440.
    1. Davis KL, Kaye JA, Masters ET, Iyer S. Real-world outcomes in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with crizotinib. Curr. Oncol. 2018;25:e40–e49. doi: 10.3747/co.25.3723.
    1. Dagogo-Jack I, Shaw AT. Crizotinib resistance: implications for therapeutic strategies. Ann. Oncol. 2016;27:iii42–iii50. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw305.
    1. Gainor JF, Dardaei L, Yoda S, Friboulet L, Leshchiner I, Katayama R, et al. Molecular mechanisms of resistance to first- and second-generation ALK inhibitors in ALK-rearranged lung cancer. Cancer Disco. 2016;6:1118–1133. doi: 10.1158/-16-0596.
    1. Katayama R, Khan TM, Benes C, Lifshits E, Ebi H, Rivera VM, et al. Therapeutic strategies to overcome crizotinib resistance in non-small cell lung cancers harboring the fusion oncogene EML4-ALK. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:7535–7540. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019559108.
    1. Peters S, Zimmermann S. Management of resistance to first-line anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 2018;19:37. doi: 10.1007/s11864-018-0553-x.
    1. Sullivan I, Planchard D. ALK inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: the latest evidence and developments. Ther. Adv. Med Oncol. 2016;8:32–47. doi: 10.1177/1758834015617355.
    1. Amatu A, Sartore-Bianchi A, Siena S. NTRK gene fusions as novel targets of cancer therapy across multiple tumour types. ESMO Open. 2016;1:e000023. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2015-000023.
    1. Wilcoxen KM, Brake RL, Saffran D, Teffera Y, Choquette D, Whittington D, et al. Characterization of a novel series of potent, selective inhibitors of wild type and mutant/fusion anaplastic lymphoma kinase. Cancer Res. 2012;72:1795. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3364.
    1. Holla VR, Elamin YY, Bailey AM, Johnson AM, Litzenburger BC, Khotskaya YB, et al. ALK: a tyrosine kinase target for cancer therapy. Cold Spring Harb. Mol. Case Stud. 2017;3:a001115. doi: 10.1101/mcs.a001115.
    1. Watanabe H, Okada M, Kaji Y, Satouchi M, Sato Y, Yamabe Y, et al. [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)] Gan Kagaku Ryoho. 2009;36:2495–2501.
    1. ALECENSA (alectinib) [package insert] (Genentech USA, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, 2018).
    1. ALUNBRIG (brigatinib) [package insert] (Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, 2018).
    1. ZYKADIA (ceritinib) [package insert] (Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, 2017).

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner