Reweighting of the sensory inputs for postural control in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy after surgery

Iu-Shiuan Lin, Dar-Ming Lai, Jian-Jiun Ding, Andy Chien, Chih-Hsiu Cheng, Shwu-Fen Wang, Jaw-Lin Wang, Chi-Lin Kuo, Wei-Li Hsu, Iu-Shiuan Lin, Dar-Ming Lai, Jian-Jiun Ding, Andy Chien, Chih-Hsiu Cheng, Shwu-Fen Wang, Jaw-Lin Wang, Chi-Lin Kuo, Wei-Li Hsu

Abstract

Background: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a degenerative cervical disease in which the spinal cord is compressed. Patients with CSM experience balance disturbance because of impaired proprioception. The weighting of the sensory inputs for postural control in patients with CSM is unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the weighting of sensory systems in patients with CSM.

Method: Twenty-four individuals with CSM (CSM group) and 24 age-matched healthy adults (healthy control group) were analyzed in this observational study. The functional outcomes (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale [mJOA], Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Questionnaire [JOACMEQ], Nurick scale) and static balance (eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions) were assessed for individuals with CSM before surgery, 3 and 6 months after surgery. Time-domain and time-frequency-domain variables of the center of pressure (COP) were analyzed to examine the weighting of the sensory systems.

Results: In the CSM group, lower extremity function of mJOA and Nurick scale significantly improved 3 and 6 months after surgery. Before surgery, the COP mean velocity and total energy were significantly higher in the CSM group than in the control group for both vision conditions. Compared with the control group, the CSM group exhibited lower energy content in the moderate-frequency band (i.e., proprioception) and higher energy content in the low-frequency band (i.e., cerebellar, vestibular, and visual systems) under the eyes-open condition. The COP mean velocity of the CSM group significantly decreased 3 months after surgery. The energy content in the low-frequency band (i.e., visual and vestibular systems) of the CSM group was closed to that of the control group 6 months after surgery under the eyes-open condition.

Conclusion: Before surgery, the patients with CSM may have had compensatory sensory weighting for postural control, with decreased weighting on proprioception and increased weighting on the other three sensory inputs. After surgery, the postural control of the patients with CSM improved, with decreased compensation for the proprioceptive system from the visual and vestibular inputs. However, the improvement remained insufficient because the patients with CSM still had lower weighting on proprioception than the healthy adults did. Therefore, patients with CSM may require balance training and posture education after surgery.

Trial registration: Trial Registration number: NCT03396055 Name of the registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Date of registration: January 10, 2018 - Retrospectively registered Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: October 19, 2015.

Keywords: Center of pressure; Gabor transform; Sensory integration; Time-frequency analysis.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Integration of the sensorimotor system. The sensorimotor system integrates the afferent, efferent, and central nervous system, and is controlled by two control systems: feedback control and feedforward control. Feedback control involves the sensory processing, in which the cerebellar system regulates the visual, vestibular and somatosensory (i.e., proprioception, pain…etc.) inputs. The sensory feedback is conveyed to the cortex to be processed, and the reactive motor command is descended to the muscle properties. Feedforward control is described as an anticipatory action with a direct descending command without sensory feedback
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Frequency band of the sensory systems
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flow diagram of this study
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
COP mean velocity at 3 time points in the CSM group and the control group. a COP mean velocity under EO condition. b COP mean velocity under EC condition. # Indicated a significant difference between the CSM group and the control group: p < 0.05. * Indicated a significant difference within the CSM group before and after surgery: p < 0.05/3 = 0.016
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Total energy content at 3 time points in the CSM group and the control group. a Total energy content under EO condition. b Total energy content under EC condition. # Indicated a significant difference between the CSM group and the control group: p < 0.05
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Percentage of energy content in each frequency band under the EO condition. a Moderate-frequency band (1.56–6.25 Hz, proprioception and spinal reflexive loop). b Low-frequency band (0.39–1.56 Hz, cerebellar system). c Very-low-frequency band (0.1–0.39 Hz, vestibular system). d Ultralow-frequency band (< 0.1 Hz, visual system). # Indicated a significant difference between the CSM group and the control group: p < 0.05
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Percentage of energy content in each frequency band under the EC condition. a Moderate-frequency band (1.56–6.25 Hz, proprioception and spinal reflexive loop). b Low-frequency band (0.39–1.56 Hz, cerebellar system). c Very-low-frequency band (0.1–0.39 Hz, vestibular system). d Ultralow-frequency band (< 0.1 Hz, visual system)

References

    1. Gibson J, Nouri A, Krueger B, Lakomkin N, Nasser R, Gimbel D, Cheng J. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: a clinical review. Yale J Biol Med. 2018;91:43–48.
    1. Mattei TA, Goulart CR, Milano JB, Dutra LP, Fasset DR. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and surgical techniques. ISRN Neurol. 2011;2011:463729. doi: 10.5402/2011/463729.
    1. Haddas R, Lieberman I, Boah A, Arakal R, Belanger T, Ju KL. Functional balance testing in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019;44:103–109. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002768.
    1. Takayama H, Muratsu H, Doita M, Harada T, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M. Impaired joint proprioception in patients with cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:83–86. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200501010-00015.
    1. Peterka RJ. Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J Neurophysiol. 2002;88:1097–1118. doi: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.3.1097.
    1. Paillard T. Effects of general and local fatigue on postural control: a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36:162–176. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.05.009.
    1. Edwards CC, 2nd, Riew KD, Anderson PA, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AF. Cervical myelopathy. Current diagnostic and treatment strategies. Spine J. 2003;3:68–81. doi: 10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00566-1.
    1. Abode-Iyamah KO, Viljoen SV, McHenry CL, Petrie MA, Stoner KE, Dahdaleh NS, Grosland NM, Howard MA, Shields RK. Effect of surgery on gait and sensory motor performance in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurosurgery. 2016;79:701–707. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001267.
    1. Malone A, Meldrum D, Bolger C. Three-dimensional gait analysis outcomes at 1 year following decompressive surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:48–56. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3267-1.
    1. Takayama H, Muratsu H, Doita M, Harada T, Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S. Proprioceptive recovery of patients with cervical myelopathy after surgical decompression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:1039–1044. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000160988.40890.1d.
    1. Prieto TE, Myklebust JB, Hoffmann RG, Lovett EG, Myklebust BM. Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1996;43:956–966. doi: 10.1109/10.532130.
    1. Wong WJ, Lai DM, Wang SF, Wang JL, Hsu WL. Changes of balance control in individuals with lumbar degenerative spine disease after lumbar surgery: a longitudinal study. Spine J. 2019;19:1210–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.02.015.
    1. Carpenter MG, Frank JS, Silcher CP, Peysar GW. The influence of postural threat on the control of upright stance. Exp Brain Res. 2001;138:210–218. doi: 10.1007/s002210100681.
    1. Lacour M, Bernard-Demanze L, Dumitrescu M. Posture control, aging, and attention resources: models and posture-analysis methods. Neurophysiol Clin. 2008;38:411–421. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2008.09.005.
    1. Bernard-Demanze L, Dumitrescu M, Jimeno P, Borel L, Lacour M. Age-related changes in posture control are differentially affected by postural and cognitive task complexity. Curr Aging Sci. 2009;2:139–149. doi: 10.2174/1874609810902020135.
    1. Golomer E, Dupui P, Bessou P. Spectral frequency analysis of dynamic balance in healthy and injured athletes. Arch Int Physiol Biochim Biophys. 1994;102:225–229.
    1. Massion J. Postural control system. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994;4:877–887. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(94)90137-6.
    1. Amblard B, Cremieux J, Marchand AR, Carblanc A. Lateral orientation and stabilization of human stance: static versus dynamic visual cues. Exp Brain Res. 1985;61:21–37. doi: 10.1007/BF00235617.
    1. Diener HC, Dichgans J, Bacher M, Gompf B. Quantification of postural sway in normals and patients with cerebellar diseases. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1984;57:134–142. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(84)90172-X.
    1. Diener HC, Dichgans J, Guschlbauer B, Mau H. The significance of proprioception on postural stabilization as assessed by ischemia. Brain Res. 1984;296:103–109. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90515-8.
    1. Dietz V, Mauritz KH, Dichgans J. Body oscillations in balancing due to segmental stretch reflex activity. Exp Brain Res. 1980;40:89–95. doi: 10.1007/BF00236666.
    1. Dupui PH, Costes-Salon MC, Montoya R, Séverac A, Lazerges M, Pagès B, Bessou P. Communication la Société d'Etudes et de Recherches Multi-disciplinaires sur la Locomotion. Paris: Collége de France; 1990. Intérêt l’analyse fréquentielle des oscillations posturales lors de l’équilibre dynamique.
    1. Friedrich M, Grein HJ, Wicher C, Schuetze J, Mueller A, Lauenroth A, Hottenrott K, Schwesig R. Influence of pathologic and simulated visual dysfunctions on the postural system. Exp Brain Res. 2008;186:305–314. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1233-4.
    1. Kapteyn TS, Gd W. Posturography as an auxiliary in vestibular investigation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009;73:104–111. doi: 10.3109/00016487209138918.
    1. Lestienne F, Soechting J, Berthoz A. Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes. Exp Brain Res. 1977;28:363–384.
    1. Mauritz KH, Dietz V. Characteristics of postural instability induced by ischemic blocking of leg afferents. Exp Brain Res. 1980;38:117–119. doi: 10.1007/BF00237939.
    1. Golomer E, Dupui P. Spectral analysis of adult dancers’ sways: sex and interaction vision-proprioception. Int J Neurosci. 2000;105:15–26. doi: 10.3109/00207450009003262.
    1. Paillard T, Costes-Salon C, Lafont C, Dupui P. Are there differences in postural regulation according to the level of competition in judoists? Br J Sports Med. 2002;36:304–305. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.36.4.304.
    1. Clark RA, Howells B, Pua YH, Feller J, Whitehead T, Webster KE. Assessment of standing balance deficits in people who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using traditional and modern analysis methods. J Biomech. 2014;47:1134–1137. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.12.015.
    1. Liang Z, Clark R, Bryant A, Quek J, Pua YH. Neck musculature fatigue affects specific frequency bands of postural dynamics during quiet standing. Gait Posture. 2014;39:397–403. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.08.007.
    1. Quek J, Brauer SG, Clark R, Treleaven J. New insights into neck-pain-related postural control using measures of signal frequency and complexity in older adults. Gait Posture. 2014;39:1069–1073. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.01.009.
    1. Benzel EC, Lancon J, Kesterson L, Hadden T. Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord. 1991;4:286–295. doi: 10.1097/00002517-199109000-00005.
    1. Chien A, Lai DM, Cheng CH, Wang SF, Hsu WL, Wang JL. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of a Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic association cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39:963–970. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000313.
    1. Chien A, Lai DM, Cheng CH, Wang SF, Hsu WL, Wang JL. Responsiveness of the Chinese versions of the Japanese Orthopaedic association cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire and neck disability index in postoperative patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2015;40:1315–1321. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001005.
    1. Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M, Seichi A, Shimamura T, Shirado O, Taguchi T, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic association cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 4. Establishment of equations for severity scores. Subcommittee on low back pain and cervical myelopathy, evaluation of the clinical outcome committee of the Japanese Orthopaedic association. J Orthop Sci. 2008;13:25–31. doi: 10.1007/s00776-007-1194-2.
    1. Nurick S. The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1972;95:87–100. doi: 10.1093/brain/95.1.87.
    1. Scoppa F, Capra R, Gallamini M, Shiffer R. Clinical stabilometry standardization: basic definitions--acquisition interval--sampling frequency. Gait Posture. 2013;37:290–292. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.07.009.
    1. Nardone A, Galante M, Grasso M, Schieppati M. Stance ataxia and delayed leg muscle responses to postural perturbations in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:539–547. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0214.
    1. Kuo CL, Ding JJ, Hsu WL. Time-frequency analysis for cervical myelopathy and cervical radiculopathy identification. Int J Electr Eng. 2018;25:81–89.
    1. Treleaven J, Murison R, Jull G, LowChoy N, Brauer S. Is the method of signal analysis and test selection important for measuring standing balance in subjects with persistent whiplash? Gait Posture. 2005;21:395–402. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.04.008.
    1. Sim T, Yoo H, Lee D, Suh SW, Yang JH, Kim H, Mun JH. Analysis of sensory system aspects of postural stability during quiet standing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15:54. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0395-6.
    1. Furlan JC, Kalsi-Ryan S, Kailaya-Vasan A, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG. Functional and clinical outcomes following surgical treatment in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study of 81 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011;14:348–355. doi: 10.3171/2010.10.SPINE091029.
    1. Kopjar B, Bohm PE, Arnold JH, Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Arnold PM. Outcomes of surgical decompression in patients with very severe degenerative cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018;43:1102–1109. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002602.
    1. Yoshida G, Kanemura T, Ishikawa Y, Matsumoto A, Ito Z, Tauchi R, Muramoto A, Matsuyama Y, Ishiguro N. The effects of surgery on locomotion in elderly patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:2545–2551. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2961-8.
    1. Yoshikawa M, Doita M, Okamoto K, Manabe M, Sha N, Kurosaka M. Impaired postural stability in patients with cervical myelopathy: evaluation by computerized static stabilometry. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:E460–E464. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318178e666.
    1. Kaneko K, Taguchi T, Morita H, Yonemura H, Fujimoto H, Kawai S. Mechanism of prolonged central motor conduction time in compressive cervical myelopathy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:1035–1040. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(01)00533-8.
    1. Machino M, Yukawa Y, Hida T, Ito K, Nakashima H, Kanbara S, Morita D, Kato F. The prevalence of pre- and postoperative symptoms in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by cervical laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:E1383–E1388. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182684c68.
    1. Yamaura I, Yone K, Nakahara S, Nagamine T, Baba H, Uchida K, Komiya S. Mechanism of destructive pathologic changes in the spinal cord under chronic mechanical compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:21–26. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200201010-00008.
    1. Goncalves S, Stevens TK, Doyle-Pettypiece P, Bartha R, Duggal N. N-acetylaspartate in the motor and sensory cortices following functional recovery after surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;25:436–443. doi: 10.3171/2016.2.SPINE15944.
    1. Hsu WL, Scholz JP, Schoner G, Jeka JJ, Kiemel T. Control and estimation of posture during quiet stance depends on multijoint coordination. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97:3024–3035. doi: 10.1152/jn.01142.2006.
    1. Reimann H, Schöner G. A multi-joint model of quiet, upright stance accounts for the “uncontrolled manifold” structure of joint variance. Biol Cybern. 2017;111:389–403. doi: 10.1007/s00422-017-0733-y.
    1. Wang TY, Pao JL, Yang RS, Jang JS, Hsu WL. The adaptive changes in muscle coordination following lumbar spinal fusion. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;40:284–297. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2015.01.002.
    1. Treleaven J. Sensorimotor disturbances in neck disorders affecting postural stability, head and eye movement control. Man Ther. 2008;13:2–11. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2007.06.003.
    1. De Pauw J, Mercelis R, Hallemans A, Van Gils G, Truijen S, Cras P, De Hertogh W. Postural control and the relation with cervical sensorimotor control in patients with idiopathic adult-onset cervical dystonia. Exp Brain Res. 2018;236:803–811. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5174-x.
    1. Chagdes JR, Rietdyk S, Haddad JM, Zelaznik HN, Raman A, Rhea CK, Silver TA. Multiple timescales in postural dynamics associated with vision and a secondary task are revealed by wavelet analysis. Exp Brain Res. 2009;197:297–310. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1915-1.
    1. Chien JE, Hsu WL. Effects of dynamic perturbation-based training on balance control of community-dwelling older adults. Sci Rep. 2018;8:17231. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35644-5.
    1. Klamroth S, Steib S, Gassner H, Gossler J, Winkler J, Eskofier B, Klucken J, Pfeifer K. Immediate effects of perturbation treadmill training on gait and postural control in patients with Parkinson's disease. Gait Posture. 2016;50:102–108. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.08.020.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner