Feasibility of an online training and support program for dementia carers: results from a mixed-methods pilot randomized controlled trial

Soraia Teles, Ana Ferreira, Constança Paúl, Soraia Teles, Ana Ferreira, Constança Paúl

Abstract

Background: iSupport is an online program developed by the World Health Organization to provide education, skills training, and social support to informal carers of persons with dementia. This pilot study examines the feasibility of the protocol for a main effectiveness trial of iSupport-Portugal and explores how the intervention and control arms compare over time on well-being outcomes.

Methods: A mixed-methods experimental parallel between-group design with two arms is followed. Participants were recruited nationwide, by referral or advertising, through the National Alzheimer's Association. Inclusion criteria are being Portuguese adults, providing e-consent, providing unpaid care to someone with dementia for at least 6 months, experiencing relevant scores on burden (≥ 21 on ZBI) or depression or anxiety (≥ 8 on HADS), and using webpages autonomously. Participants were consecutively randomized to receive iSupport-Portugal or an education-only e-book and were not blinded to group assignment. Data were collected online with self-administered instruments, at baseline, 3 and 6 months after. Outcomes comprise caregiver burden, depression, anxiety, QoL, positive aspects of caregiving, and self-efficacy. Generalized estimating equations were used to estimate group, time, and group-by-time effects. Intervention engagement data were extracted from iSupport's platform. Semi-structured interviews were conducted.

Results: Forty-two participants were allocated to the intervention (N = 21) and control (N = 21) arms. Participation (78.1%) and retention rates (73.8%) were fair. More carers in the control arm completed the study (N = 20, 95.2%) than in the intervention arm (N = 11; 52.4%) (χ2 = 9.98, p = .002). Non-completers were younger, spent less time caring, and scored higher on anxiety. Among carers in the intervention arm, the average attendance rate was of 53.7%. At post-test 38.9% of participants still used iSupport; the remainder participants interrupted use within 2 weeks (Mdn). For per-protocol analyses, significant group-by-time interaction effects favouring the intervention were found for anxiety (Wald χ2 = 6.17, p = .046) and for environmental QoL (Wald χ2 = 7.06, p = .029). Those effects were not observed in intention-to-treat analyses adjusted for age. Interviewees from the intervention arm (N = 12) reported positive results of iSupport on knowledge and on experiencing positive feelings. No adverse effects were reported.

Conclusions: This study provides information for a forthcoming full-scale effectiveness trial, as on the acceptability and potential results of iSupport-Portugal. iSupport is suggested as a relevant resource for Portuguese carers.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04104568 . 26/09/2019.

Keywords: Dementia; Informal Carers; Knowledge and skills training; Online program; Pilot study; Portugal.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no competing interests or financial disclosures.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
iSupport modules, lessons, and psychological techniques. Adapted from [38]. Lessons names vary slightly in the European-Portuguese version
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Diagram for the pilot study. CR – Care recipient. N – number of participants

References

    1. World Health Organization. 10 facts on dementia [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Dec 28]. Available from:
    1. World Health Organization. The epidemiology and impact of dementia: current state and future trends [Internet]. 2015. Available from:
    1. Wimo A, Gauthier S, Prince M. Global estimates of informal care [internet]. 2018. Available from:
    1. World Health Organisation. Supporting Informal Caregivers of People Living With Dementia. [Internet]. 2015. Available from:
    1. Lawton MP, Moss M, Kleban MH, Glicksman A, Rovine M. A two-factor model of caregiving appraisal and psychological well-being. J Gerontol. 1991;46(4):P181–P189. doi: 10.1093/geronj/46.4.P181.
    1. Prince M, Jackson J. World Alzheimer report 2009 [internet]. London; 2009. Available from:
    1. Gilhooly KJ, Gilhooly MLM, Sullivan MP, McIntyre A, Wilson L, Harding E, et al. A meta-review of stress, coping and interventions in dementia and dementia caregiving. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0280-8.
    1. Schulz R, O’Brien AT, Bookwala J, Fleissner K. Psychiatric and physical morbidity effects of dementia caregiving: prevalence, correlates, and causes. Gerontologist. 1995;35(6):771–791. doi: 10.1093/geront/35.6.771.
    1. Afram B, Stephan A, Verbeek H, Bleijlevens MHC, Suhonen R, Sutcliffe C, et al. Reasons for institutionalization of people with dementia: informal caregiver reports from 8 European countries. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(2):108–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.09.012.
    1. Kuzuya M, Enoki H, Hasegawa J, Izawa S, Hirakawa Y, Shimokata H, et al. Impact of caregiver burden on adverse health outcomes in community-dwelling dependent older care recipients. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011;19(4):382–391. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181e9b98d.
    1. Cooper C, Blanchard M, Selwood A, Walker Z, Livingston G. Family carers’ distress and abusive behaviour: longitudinal study. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196(6):480–485. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.071811.
    1. Hopwood J, Walker N, McDonagh L, Rait G, Walters K, Iliffe S, et al. Internet-based interventions aimed at supporting family caregivers of people with dementia: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(6):e216. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9548.
    1. Cristancho-Lacroix V, Moulin F, Wrobel J, Batrancourt B, Plichart M, De Rotrou J, et al. A web-based program for informal caregivers of persons with Alzheimer’s disease: an iterative user-centered design. JMIR Res Protoc. 2014;3(3):e46. doi: 10.2196/resprot.3607.
    1. Etxeberria I, Salaberria K, Gorostiaga A. Online support for family caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs and quasi-experimental studies. Aging Ment Health. 2020:1–16 Available from: .
    1. Yinan Z, Hui F, Mingyue H, Hengyu H, Hui L, Hongting N, et al. Web-based interventions to improve mental health in home caregivers of people with dementia: Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(5):e13415. doi: 10.2196/13415.
    1. Leng M, Zhao Y, Xiao H, Li C, Wang Z. Internet-based supportive interventions for family caregivers of people with dementia: systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e19468. doi: 10.2196/19468.
    1. Boots LMM, de Vugt ME, van Knippenberg RJM, Kempen GIJM, Verhey FRJ. A systematic review of internet-based supportive interventions for caregivers of patients with dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;29(4):331–344. doi: 10.1002/gps.4016.
    1. Pleasant M, Molinari V, Dobbs D, Meng H, Hyer K. Effectiveness of online dementia caregivers training programs: a systematic review. Geriatr Nurs. 2020;41(6):921–935. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.07.004.
    1. Egan KJ, Pinto-Bruno ÁC, Bighelli I, Berg-Weger M, van Straten A, Albanese E, et al. Online training and support programs designed to improve mental health and reduce burden among caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018;19(3):200–206.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.10.023.
    1. Parra-Vidales E, Soto-Pérez F, Perea-Bartolomé MV, Franco-Martín MA, Muñoz-Sánchez JL. Online interventions for caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2017;45(3):116–126.
    1. Kishita N, Hammond L, Dietrich CM, Mioshi E. Which interventions work for dementia family carers?: an updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials of carer interventions. Int Psychogeriatr. 2018;30(11):1679–1696. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218000947.
    1. Moniz-Cook E, Vernooij-Dassen M, Woods R, Verhey F, Chattat R, De Vugt M, et al. A European consensus on outcome measures for psychosocial intervention research in dementia care. Aging Ment Health. 2008;12(1):14–29. doi: 10.1080/13607860801919850.
    1. Pot AM, Gallagher-Thompson D, Xiao LD, Willemse BM, Rosier I, Mehta KM, et al. iSupport: a WHO global online intervention for informal caregivers of people with dementia. World Psychiatry. 2019;18(3):365–366. doi: 10.1002/wps.20684.
    1. Kitwood T. Dementia reconsidered. The person comes first. Berkshire: Open University Press; 1997.
    1. Teles S, Napolskij MS, Paúl C, Ferreira A, Seeher K. Training and support for caregivers of people with dementia: the process of culturally adapting the World Health Organization iSupport programme to Portugal. Dementia. 2020;147130122091033 Available from: .
    1. OECD. Health at a Glance 2019 OECD Indicators [Internet] 2019. Available from:
    1. Barbosa F, Matos A. Informal support in Portugal by individuals aged 50+ Eur J Ageing. 2014;11(4):293–300. doi: 10.1007/s10433-014-0321-0.
    1. Gonçalves-Pereira M, Marques MJ, Balsinha C, Fernandes A, Machado AS, Verdelho A, et al. Necessidades de Cuidados e Recurso aos Serviços na Demência: Avaliação Inicial da Coorte Portuguesa no Estudo Actifcare. Acta Medica Port. 2019;32(5):355. doi: 10.20344/amp.11136.
    1. Teles S, Ferreira A, Paúl C. Access and retention of informal dementia caregivers in psychosocial interventions: a cross-sectional study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021.
    1. Stephan A, Bieber A, Hopper L, Joyce R, Irving K, Zanetti O, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the access to and use of formal dementia care: findings of a focus group study with people with dementia, informal carers and health and social care professionals in eight European countries. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0816-1.
    1. Teles S, Ferreira A, Paúl C. Assessing attitudes towards online psychoeducational interventions: psychometric properties of a brief attitudes scale. Health Soc Care Commun. 2020:hsc.13227 Available from: .
    1. Teles S, Paúl C, Sosa Napolskij M, Ferreira A. Dementia caregivers training needs and preferences for online interventions: a mixed-methods study. J Clin Nurs. 2020.
    1. Mehta KM, Gallagher-Thompson D, Varghese M, Loganathan S, Baruah U, Seeher K, et al. iSupport, an online training and support program for caregivers of people with dementia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in India. Trials. 2018;19(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2604-9.
    1. Pinto-Bruno ÁC, Pot AM, Kleiboer A, Droes RM, Van Straten A. An online minimally guided intervention to support family and other unpaid carers of people with dementia: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019;8(10).
    1. Baruah U, Varghese M, Loganathan S, Mehta KM, Gallagher-Thompson D, Zandi D, et al. Feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of an online training and support program for caregivers of people with dementia in India: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021;36:606–617. doi: 10.1002/gps.5502.
    1. Teles S, Ferreira A, Seeher K, Fréel S, Paúl C. Online training and support program (iSupport) for informal dementia caregivers: protocol for an intervention study in Portugal. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1364-z.
    1. Teles S, Paúl C, Lima P, Chilro R, Ferreira A. User feedback and usability testing of an online training and support program for dementia carers. Internet Interv. 2021;25:100412. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100412.
    1. World Health Organization. iSupport for Dementia: Training and support manual for carers of people with dementia [Internet]. 2019. Available from:
    1. Alzheimer Europe, Alzheimer Portugal. Manual do Cuidador da pessoa com demência [Internet]. A.P.F.A.D.A. LISBOA; 2006. 1–206 p. Available from: .
    1. Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016;25(3).
    1. MAPI Research Trust. Zarit Burden Interview [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2021 Mar 30]. Available from:
    1. Pais-Ribeiro J, Silva I, Ferreira T, Martins A, Meneses R, Baltar M. Validation study of a Portuguese version of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Psychol Health Med. 2007;12(2):225–237. doi: 10.1080/13548500500524088.
    1. Gonçalves-Pereira M, Carmo I, da Silva JA, Papoila AL, Mateos R, Zarit SH. Caregiving experiences and knowledge about dementia in Portuguese clinical outpatient settings. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010;22(2):270–280. doi: 10.1017/S1041610209991050.
    1. Araújo M, Moura O. Estrutura factorial da General Self-Efficacy Scale (Escala de Auto-Eficácia Geral) numa amostra de professores portugueses. Laboratório Psicol. 2013;9(1):95–105. doi: 10.14417/lp.638.
    1. Vaz Serra A, Cristina Canavarro M, Simões M, Pereira M, Gameiro S, João Quartilho M, et al. Estudos Psicométricos do Instrumento de Avaliação da Qualidade de Vida da Organização Mundial de Saúde (WHOQOL-Bref) para Português de Portugal. Psiquiatr Clín. 2006;27(1).
    1. Gonçalves-Pereira M, Zarit SH. The Zarit burden interview in Portugal: validity and recommendations in dementia and palliative care. Acta Medica Port. 2014;27(2):163–165. doi: 10.20344/amp.5107.
    1. Pot AM, Blom MM, Willemse BM. Acceptability of a guided self-help internet intervention for family caregivers: mastery over dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015;27(8):1343–1354. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215000034.
    1. Robinson KM, Buckwalter K, Reed D. Differences between dementia caregivers who are users and nonusers of community services. Public Health Nurs. 2013;30(6):501–510.
    1. Schröder J, Berger T, Meyer B, Lutz W, Späth C, Michel P, et al. Impact and change of attitudes toward internet interventions within a randomized controlled trial on individuals with depression symptoms. Depress Anxiety. 2018;35(5):421–430. doi: 10.1002/da.22727.
    1. Goldfarb A, Prince J. Internet adoption and usage patterns are different: implications for the digital divide. Inf Econ Policy. 2008;20(1):2–15. doi: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2007.05.001.
    1. Dorsey ER, Yvonne Chan Y-F, McConnell MV, Shaw SY, Trister AD, Friend SH. The use of smartphones for Health Research. Acad Med. 2017;92(2):157–160. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001205.
    1. Lee EC, Whitehead AL, Jacques RM, Julious SA. The statistical interpretation of pilot trials: should significance thresholds be reconsidered? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-41.
    1. Armijo-Olivo S, Warren S, Magee D. Intention to treat analysis, compliance, drop-outs and how to deal with missing data in clinical research: a review. Phys Ther Rev. 2009;14(1):36–49. doi: 10.1179/174328809X405928.
    1. Hardt J, Herke M, Brian T, Laubach W. Multiple imputation of missing data: a simulation study on a binary response. Open. J Stat. 2013;03(05).
    1. World Health Organization . Global action plan on the public health response to dementia 2017–2025 [internet] Geneva: World Health Organization. Geneva; 2017.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner