Efficacy and Safety of SHR0302, a Highly Selective Janus Kinase 1 Inhibitor, in Patients with Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Phase II Randomized Clinical Trial

Yan Zhao, Litao Zhang, Yangfeng Ding, Xiaohua Tao, Chao Ji, Xiuqin Dong, Jianyun Lu, Liming Wu, Rupeng Wang, Qianjin Lu, Aik Han Goh, Rongjun Liu, Zhiguo Zhang, Jianzhong Zhang, Yan Zhao, Litao Zhang, Yangfeng Ding, Xiaohua Tao, Chao Ji, Xiuqin Dong, Jianyun Lu, Liming Wu, Rupeng Wang, Qianjin Lu, Aik Han Goh, Rongjun Liu, Zhiguo Zhang, Jianzhong Zhang

Abstract

Background: Atopic dermatitis is a chronic, inflammatory condition causing a substantial burden to patients and caregivers. SHR0302 is an oral, highly selective, Janus kinase 1 inhibitor under investigation for inflammatory skin diseases.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of SHR0302 in Chinese patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

Design and setting: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase II trial was conducted in China between October 2019 and August 2020.

Participants: Patients (n = 105) aged 18-75 years with moderate to severe dermatitis and nonresponsive or intolerant to topical or conventional systemic treatments were included.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1:1 to receive SHR0302 4 mg once daily, SHR0302 8 mg once daily, or placebo for 12 weeks.

Main outcome measures: The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) response (IGA of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] with improvement of ≥2 grades) at week 12. Secondary efficacy assessments included Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores.

Results: At week 12, IGA response was achieved in nine patients (25.7%; 90% confidence interval [CI] 13.6-37.9%; p = 0.022) in the SHR0302 4 mg group, 19 patients (54.3%; 90% CI 40.4-68.1%; p < 0.001) in the SHR0302 8 mg group, and two patients (5.7%; 90% CI 0.0-12.2%) in the placebo group. EASI75 was achieved in 51.4% (p = 0.013), 74.3% (p < 0.001), and 22.9% of patients in the SHR0302 4 mg, SHR0302 8 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, while an NRS ≥3-point improvement occurred in 65.7% (p < 0.001), 74.3% (p < 0.001), and 22.9% of patients, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 60.0%, 68.6%, and 51.4% of patients in the SHR0302 4 mg, SHR0302 8 mg, and placebo groups, respectively. The adverse events were mild in most cases. Three serious adverse events were reported, all being worsening of atopic dermatitis. No serious infection was reported.

Conclusions and relevance: Oral SHR0302 was effective and well tolerated in Chinese adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04162899; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ . Date first registered: 14 November 2019.

Conflict of interest statement

Aik Han Goh, Rongjun Liu, and Zhiguo Zhang are employees of Reistone Biopharma Co., Ltd. Yan Zhao, Litao Zhang, Yangfeng Ding, Xiaohua Tao, Chao Ji, Xiuqin Dong, Jianyun Lu, Liming Wu, Rupeng Wang, Qianjin Lu, and Jianzhong Zhang declare they have no conflicts of interest.

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagram. a The primary reason for screening failure was the potential presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (n = 21). b One patient completed treatment but was lost to follow-up. AD atopic dermatitis, CONSORT Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Line plots for proportions of patients who achieved a IGA response, b EASI75, and c NRS-3 (FAS). Two subjects in the placebo group had baseline NRS <3, therefore these two subjects would not show an improvement of ≥3 from baseline. The denominator of each treatment group was the number of subjects in the FAS of each treatment group. EASI Eczema Area and Severity Index, FAS full analysis set, IGA Investigator’s Global Assessment, NRS Numerical Rating Scale, W week. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

References

    1. Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Chamlin SL, Feldman SR, Hanifin JM, Simpson EL, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 1. Diagnosis and assessment of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;70(2):338–351. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.10.010.
    1. Vakharia PP, Chopra R, Sacotte R, Patel KR, Singam V, Patel N, et al. Burden of skin pain in atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017;119(6):548–52.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.09.076.
    1. Silverberg JI, Hanifin JM. Adult eczema prevalence and associations with asthma and other health and demographic factors: a US population-based study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(5):1132–1138. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.08.031.
    1. Williams H, Robertson C, Stewart A, Aït-Khaled N, Anabwani G, Anderson R, et al. Worldwide variations in the prevalence of symptoms of atopic eczema in the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103(1 Pt 1):125–138. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70536-1.
    1. Wollenberg A, Barbarot S, Bieber T, Christen-Zaech S, Deleuran M, Fink-Wagner A, et al. Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: part I. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(5):657–682. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14891.
    1. Chiesa Fuxench ZC, Block JK, Boguniewicz M, Boyle J, Fonacier L, Gelfand JM, et al. Atopic Dermatitis in America Study: a cross-sectional study examining the prevalence and disease burden of atopic dermatitis in the US adult population. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139(3):583–590. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.08.028.
    1. Wang X, Li LF, Zhao DY, Shen YW. Prevalence and clinical features of atopic dermatitis in China. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2568301. doi: 10.1155/2016/2568301.
    1. Eckert L, Gupta S, Amand C, Gadkari A, Mahajan P, Gelfand JM. The burden of atopic dermatitis in US adults: health care resource utilization data from the 2013 National Health and Wellness Survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(1):54–61.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.08.002.
    1. Eckert L, Gupta S, Gadkari A, Mahajan P, Gelfand JM. Burden of illness in adults with atopic dermatitis: analysis of National Health and Wellness Survey data from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81(1):187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.03.037.
    1. Carroll CL, Balkrishnan R, Feldman SR, Fleischer AB, Jr, Manuel JC. The burden of atopic dermatitis: impact on the patient, family, and society. Pediatr Dermatol. 2005;22(3):192–199. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2005.22303.x.
    1. Drucker AM, Wang AR, Li WQ, Sevetson E, Block JK, Qureshi AA. The burden of atopic dermatitis: summary of a report for the National Eczema Association. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(1):26–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.07.012.
    1. Rønnstad ATM, Halling-Overgaard AS, Hamann CR, Skov L, Egeberg A, Thyssen JP. Association of atopic dermatitis with depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79(3):448–56.e30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.03.017.
    1. Silverberg JI, Gelfand JM, Margolis DJ, Boguniewicz M, Fonacier L, Grayson MH, et al. Symptoms and diagnosis of anxiety and depression in atopic dermatitis in U.S. adults. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(3):554–565. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17683.
    1. Silverberg JI, Gelfand JM, Margolis DJ, Boguniewicz M, Fonacier L, Grayson MH, et al. Patient burden and quality of life in atopic dermatitis in US adults: a population-based cross-sectional study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;121(3):340–347. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.07.006.
    1. Atopic Dermatitis Working Group, Immunology Group Chinese Society of Dermatology. Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in China (2020). Chinese Journal of Dermatology. 2020;53(2):81-8.
    1. Boguniewicz M, Alexis AF, Beck LA, Block J, Eichenfield LF, Fonacier L, et al. Expert perspectives on management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a multidisciplinary consensus addressing current and emerging therapies. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017;5(6):1519–1531. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.08.005.
    1. Calzavara Pinton P, Cristaudo A, Foti C, Canonica GW, Balato N, Costanzo A, et al. Diagnosis and management of moderate to severe adult atopic dermatitis: a Consensus by the Italian Society of Dermatology and Venereology (SIDeMaST), the Italian Association of Hospital Dermatologists (ADOI), the Italian Society of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC), and the Italian Society of Allergological, Environmental and Occupational Dermatology (SIDAPA). G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2018;153(2):133-45. 10.23736/s0392-0488.17.05892-8.
    1. Eichenfield LF, Tom WL, Berger TG, Krol A, Paller AS, Schwarzenberger K, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 2. Management and treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(1):116–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.023.
    1. Sidbury R, Davis DM, Cohen DE, Cordoro KM, Berger TG, Bergman JN, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 3. Management and treatment with phototherapy and systemic agents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(2):327–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.03.030.
    1. Hendricks AJ, Lio PA, Shi VY. Management recommendations for dupilumab partial and non-durable responders in atopic dermatitis. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019;20(4):565–569. doi: 10.1007/s40257-019-00436-8.
    1. Simpson EL, Bieber T, Guttman-Yassky E, Beck LA, Blauvelt A, Cork MJ, et al. Two phase 3 trials of dupilumab versus placebo in atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(24):2335–2348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610020.
    1. Boguniewicz M, Leung DY. Atopic dermatitis: a disease of altered skin barrier and immune dysregulation. Immunol Rev. 2011;242(1):233–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01027.x.
    1. Brandt EB, Sivaprasad U. Th2 cytokines and atopic dermatitis. J Clin Cell Immunol. 2011;2(3). 10.4172/2155-9899.1000110.
    1. Singh R, Heron CE, Ghamrawi RI, Strowd LC, Feldman SR. Emerging role of Janus kinase inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Immunotargets Ther. 2020;9:255–272. doi: 10.2147/itt.s229667.
    1. Cotter DG, Schairer D, Eichenfield L. Emerging therapies for atopic dermatitis: JAK inhibitors. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(3 Suppl 1):S53–S62. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.019.
    1. Bissonnette R, Papp KA, Poulin Y, Gooderham M, Raman M, Mallbris L, et al. Topical tofacitinib for atopic dermatitis: a phase IIa randomized trial. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175(5):902–911. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14871.
    1. Kim BS, Howell MD, Sun K, Papp K, Nasir A, Kuligowski ME. Treatment of atopic dermatitis with ruxolitinib cream (JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor) or triamcinolone cream. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(2):572–582. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.08.042.
    1. Nakagawa H, Nemoto O, Igarashi A, Saeki H, Kaino H, Nagata T. Delgocitinib ointment, a topical Janus kinase inhibitor, in adult patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study and an open-label, long-term extension study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(4):823–831. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.12.015.
    1. Bissonnette R, Maari C, Forman S, Bhatia N, Lee M, Fowler J, et al. The oral Janus kinase/spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor ASN002 demonstrates efficacy and improves associated systemic inflammation in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(4):733–742. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17932.
    1. Guttman-Yassky E, Thaçi D, Pangan AL, Hong HC, Papp KA, Reich K, et al. Upadacitinib in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: 16-week results from a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(3):877–884. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.11.025.
    1. Silverberg JI, Simpson EL, Thyssen JP, Gooderham M, Chan G, Feeney C, et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156(8):863–873. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.1406.
    1. Simpson EL, Lacour JP, Spelman L, Galimberti R, Eichenfield LF, Bissonnette R, et al. Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and inadequate response to topical corticosteroids: results from two randomized monotherapy phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(2):242–255. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18898.
    1. Simpson EL, Sinclair R, Forman S, Wollenberg A, Aschoff R, Cork M, et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (JADE MONO-1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10246):255–266. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30732-7.
    1. Babon JJ, Lucet IS, Murphy JM, Nicola NA, Varghese LN. The molecular regulation of Janus kinase (JAK) activation. Biochem J. 2014;462(1):1–13. doi: 10.1042/bj20140712.
    1. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
    1. Gooderham MJ, Bissonnette R, Grewal P, Lansang P, Papp KA, Hong CH. Approach to the assessment and management of adult patients with atopic dermatitis: a consensus document. Section II: tools for assessing the severity of atopic dermatitis. J Cutan Med Surg. 2018;22(1 Suppl):10s–s16. doi: 10.1177/1203475418803628.
    1. Paller AS, Kabashima K, Bieber T. Therapeutic pipeline for atopic dermatitis: end of the drought? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140(3):633–643. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.07.006.
    1. Jeon C, Yan D, Nakamura M, Sekhon S, Bhutani T, Berger T, et al. Frequency and management of sleep disturbance in adults with atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2017;7(3):349–364. doi: 10.1007/s13555-017-0192-3.
    1. Kapur S, Watson W, Carr S. Atopic dermatitis. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018;14(Suppl 2):52. doi: 10.1186/s13223-018-0281-6.
    1. Atopic Dermatitis Working Group, Immunology Group, Chinese Society of Dermatology. Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in China. Chinese Journal of Dermatology. 2020;53(2):81-8.
    1. Nezamololama N, Fieldhouse K, Metzger K, Gooderham M. Emerging systemic JAK inhibitors in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a review of abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib. Drugs Context. 2020;9:2020-8-5. 10.7573/dic.2020-8-5.
    1. He H, Guttman-Yassky E. JAK inhibitors for atopic dermatitis: an update. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019;20(2):181–192. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-0413-2.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner