Platelet Function and Genotype after DES Implantation in East Asian Patients: Rationale and Characteristics of the PTRG-DES Consortium

Ae-Young Her, Young-Hoon Jeong, Byeong-Keuk Kim, Hyung Joon Joo, Kiyuk Chang, Yongwhi Park, Young Bin Song, Sung Gyun Ahn, Jung-Won Suh, Sang Yeup Lee, Jung Rae Cho, Hyo-Soo Kim, Moo Hyun Kim, Do-Sun Lim, Eun-Seok Shin, PTRG-DES Consortium Investigators, Ae-Young Her, Young-Hoon Jeong, Byeong-Keuk Kim, Hyung Joon Joo, Kiyuk Chang, Yongwhi Park, Young Bin Song, Sung Gyun Ahn, Jung-Won Suh, Sang Yeup Lee, Jung Rae Cho, Hyo-Soo Kim, Moo Hyun Kim, Do-Sun Lim, Eun-Seok Shin, PTRG-DES Consortium Investigators

Abstract

Purpose: Platelet function test (PFT) results and genotype hold unique prognostic implications in East Asian patients. The aim of the PTRG-DES (Platelet function and genoType-Related long-term proGnosis in Drug-Eluting Stent-treated Patients with coronary artery disease) consortium is to assess the clinical impact thereof on long-term clinical outcomes in Korean patients with coronary artery disease during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) including clopidogrel.

Materials and methods: Searching publications on the PubMed, we reviewed clopidogrel treatment studies with PFT and/or genotype data for potential inclusion in this study. Lead investigators were invited to share PFT/genotype results, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes to evaluate relationships among them.

Results: Nine registries from 32 academic centers participated in the PTRG-DES consortium, contributing individual patient data from 13160 patients who underwent DES implantation between July 2003 and August 2018. The PTRG-PFT cohort was composed of 11714 patients with available VerifyNow assay results. Platelet reactivity levels reached 218±79 P2Y12 reaction units (PRU), and high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity based on a consensus-recommended cutoff (PRU >208) was observed in 55.9%. The PTRG-Genotype cohort consisted of 8163 patients with candidate genotypes related with clopidogrel responsiveness. Of those with cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotype, frequencies of carrying one and two loss-of-function allele (s) (*2 or *3) were 47.9% (intermediate metabolizers) and 14.2% (poor metabolizers), respectively.

Conclusion: The PTRG-DES consortium highlights unique values for on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity and CYP2C19 phenotype that may be important to developing optimal antiplatelet regimens in East Asian patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04734028.

Keywords: East Asia; coronary artery disease; drug-eluting stent; genotype; platelet function.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Jeong has received honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi-Aventis, Han-mi Pharmaceuticals, and Yuhan Pharmaceuticals, as well as research grants or support from Yuhan Pharmaceuticals and U&I Corporation. Dr. Song has received honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi-Aventis, Bayer Korea, and Samjin Pharmaceutical. Dr. Joo has received honoraria for lectures from AstraZeneca, Hanmi, Samjin, Dong-A, HK inno. N Pharmaceuticals, and DIO Medical Ltd. The other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

© Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2022.

Figures

Fig. 1. Cohorts of the PTRG-DES consortium.…
Fig. 1. Cohorts of the PTRG-DES consortium. ABCB1, ATP Binding Cassette Subfamily B Member 1; CYP, cytochrome P450; PFT, platelet function test; PON1, Paraoxonase 1; PTRG-DES, Platelet function and genoType-Related long-term proGnosis in Drug-Eluting Stent-treated patients with coronary artery disease.
Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier analysis for MACCE and…
Fig. 2. Kaplan-Meier analysis for MACCE and major bleeding events (PTRG-DES consortium; n=13160). The blue line represents cumulative event rates of MACCE and the red line represents cumulative event rates of major bleeding events during follow-up period in this consortium. MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events; PTRG-DES, Platelet function and genoType-Related long-term proGnosis in Drug-Eluting Stent-treated Patients with coronary artery disease.
Fig. 3. PRU and ARU levels in…
Fig. 3. PRU and ARU levels in patients with (red) vs. without (blue) ischemic events (MACCE). PRU, P2Y12 reaction unit; ARU, aspirin reaction unit; MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.
Fig. 4. Kaplan-Meier analysis for the association…
Fig. 4. Kaplan-Meier analysis for the association between HPR and MACCE and major bleeding events. (A) HPR to ADP (PRU >208) and MACCE and major bleeding events. (B) HPR to arachidonic acid (ARU >550) and MACCE and major bleeding events. HPR, high platelet reactivity; MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; PRU, P2Y12 reaction units; ARU, aspirin reaction units.
Fig. 5. Kaplan-Meier analysis for the association…
Fig. 5. Kaplan-Meier analysis for the association between CYP2C19 phenotype and MACCE. MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events; EM, extensive metabolizers; IM, intermediate metabolizers; PM, poor metabolizers.

References

    1. Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Fihn SD, Fleisher LA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1082–1115.
    1. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, Collet JP, Costa F, Jeppsson A, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Eur Heart J. 2017;39:213–260.
    1. Sibbing D, Aradi D, Alexopoulos D, Ten Berg J, Bhatt DL, Bonello L, et al. Updated expert consensus statement on platelet function and genetic testing for guiding P2Y12 receptor inhibitor treatment in percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:1521–1537.
    1. Kim HK, Tantry US, Smith SC, Jr, Jeong MH, Park SJ, Kim MH, et al. The East Asian paradox: an updated position statement on the challenges to the current antithrombotic strategy in patients with cardiovascular disease. Thromb Haemost. 2021;121:422–432.
    1. Levine GN, Jeong YH, Goto S, Anderson JL, Huo Y, Mega JL, et al. Expert consensus document: World Heart Federation expert consensus statement on antiplatelet therapy in East Asian patients with ACS or undergoing PCI. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:597–606.
    1. Kang J, Han JK, Ahn Y, Chae SC, Kim YJ, Chae IH, et al. Third-generation P2Y12 inhibitors in East Asian acute myocardial infarction patients: a nationwide prospective multicentre study. Thromb Haemost. 2018;118:591–600.
    1. Kang J, Park KW, Palmerini T, Stone GW, Lee MS, Colombo A, et al. Racial differences in ischaemia/bleeding risk trade-off during anti-platelet therapy: individual patient level landmark meta-analysis from seven RCTs. Thromb Haemost. 2019;119:149–162.
    1. Park DW, Kwon O, Jang JS, Yun SC, Park H, Kang DY, et al. Clinically significant bleeding with ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in Korean patients with acute coronary syndromes intended for invasive management: a randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2019;140:1865–1877.
    1. Kim HK, Ahn Y, Chang K, Jeong YH, Hahn JY, Choo EH, et al. 2020 Korean Society of Myocardial Infarction expert consensus document on pharmacotherapy for acute myocardial infarction. Korean Circ J. 2020;50:845–866.
    1. Tan JW, Chew DP, Abdul Kader MAS, Ako J, Bahl VK, Chan M, et al. 2020 Asian Pacific Society of cardiology consensus recommendations on the use of P2Y12 receptor antagonists in the Asia-Pacific region. Eur Cardiol. 2021;16:e02.
    1. Patel MR, Calhoon JH, Dehmer GJ, Grantham JA, Maddox TM, Maron DJ, et al. ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization in patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology appropriate use criteria task force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:2212–2241.
    1. Jeong YH, Bliden KP, Antonino MJ, Park KS, Tantry US, Gurbel PA. Usefulness of the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay to evaluate the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel therapies. Am Heart J. 2012;164:35–42.
    1. Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Weisz G, Rinaldi MJ, Neumann FJ, Metzger DC, et al. Platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes after coronary artery implantation of drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES): a prospective multicentre registry study. Lancet. 2013;382:614–623.
    1. Joo HJ, Ahn SG, Park JH, Park JY, Hong SJ, Kim SY, et al. Effects of genetic variants on platelet reactivity and one-year clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective multicentre registry study. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1229.
    1. Kim HS, Chang K, Koh YS, Park MW, Choi YS, Park CS, et al. CYP2C19 poor metabolizer is associated with clinical outcome of clopidogrel therapy in acute myocardial infarction but not stable angina. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2013;6:514–521.
    1. Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikelboom J, et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2011;123:2736–2747.
    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2018;40:237–269.
    1. Li C, Zhang L, Wang H, Li S, Zhang Y, You L, et al. Gene variants in responsiveness to clopidogrel have no impact on clinical outcomes in Chinese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention-A multicenter study. Int J Cardiol. 2017;240:360–366.
    1. Mega JL, Close SL, Wiviott SD, Shen L, Hockett RD, Brandt JT, et al. Cytochrome p-450 polymorphisms and response to clopidogrel. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:354–362.
    1. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A, Cannon CP, Emanuelsson H, Held C, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1045–1057.
    1. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH, Montalescot G, Ruzyllo W, Gottlieb S, et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2001–2015.
    1. Jeong YH. “East asian paradox”: challenge for the current antiplatelet strategy of “one-guideline-fits-all races” in acute coronary syndrome. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014;16:485.
    1. Sun Y, Li C, Zhang L, Yu T, Ye H, Yu B, et al. Clinical outcomes after ticagrelor and clopidogrel in Chinese post-stented patients. Atherosclerosis. 2019;290:52–58.
    1. You SC, Rho Y, Bikdeli B, Kim J, Siapos A, Weaver J, et al. Association of ticagrelor vs clopidogrel with net adverse clinical events in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2020;324:1640–1650.
    1. Nakamura M, Kimura K, Kimura T, Ishihara M, Otsuka F, Kozuma K, et al. JCS 2020 guideline focused update on antithrombotic therapy in patients with coronary artery disease. Circ J. 2020;84:831–865.
    1. Galli M, Benenati S, Capodanno D, Franchi F, Rollini F, D’Amario D, et al. Guided versus standard antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2021;397:1470–1483.
    1. Pereira NL, Farkouh ME, So D, Lennon R, Geller N, Mathew V, et al. Effect of genotype-guided oral P2Y12 inhibitor selection vs conventional clopidogrel therapy on ischemic outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: the TAILOR-PCI randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;324:761–771.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner