Evaluation of the effectiveness of care groups in expanding population coverage of Key child survival interventions and reducing under-5 mortality: a comparative analysis using the lives saved tool (LiST)

Christine Marie George, Emilia Vignola, Jim Ricca, Tom Davis, Jamie Perin, Yvonne Tam, Henry Perry, Christine Marie George, Emilia Vignola, Jim Ricca, Tom Davis, Jamie Perin, Yvonne Tam, Henry Perry

Abstract

Background: Globally, less than half of Countdown Countries will achieve the Millennium Development Goal of reducing the under-5 mortality rate (U5MR) by two-thirds by 2015. There is growing interest in community-based delivery mechanisms to help accelerate progress. One promising approach is the use of a form of participatory mothers' groups, called Care Groups, for expanding coverage of key child survival interventions, an essential feature for achieving mortality impact.

Methods: In this study we evaluate the effectiveness of Care Group projects conducted in 5 countries in Africa and Asia in comparison to other United States Agency for International Development-funded child survival projects in terms of increasing coverage of key child survival interventions and reducing U5MR (estimated using the Lives Saved Tool, or LiST). Ten Care Group and nine non-Care Group projects were matched by country and year of program implementation.

Results: In Care Group project areas, coverage increases were more than double those in non-Care Group project areas for key child survival interventions (p = 0.0007). The mean annual percent change in U5MR modelled in LiST for the Care Group and non-Care Group projects was -4.80% and -3.14%, respectively (p = 0.09).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that Care Groups may provide a promising approach to significantly increase key child survival interventions and increase reductions in U5MR. Evaluations of child survival programs should be a top priority in global health to build a greater evidence base for effective approaches for program delivery.

References

    1. Unicef . Tate of the World’s children 2013. New York: Unicef; 2013.
    1. Dr M, Hamer D, Pagnoni F, Peterson S. Introduction to a special supplement: evidence for the implementation, effects, and impact of the integrated community case management strategy to treat childhood infection. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;87(5 Suppl):2–5. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0504.
    1. Lassi Z, Haider B, Bhutta ZA. Community-based intervention packages for reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality and improving neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;11:Cd007754.
    1. Unicef, Who. Countdown To 2015. Fulfilling The Health Agenda For Women And Children: The 2014 Report. 2014. (Accessed 15 March 2015)
    1. Chan M, Lake A. Towards ending preventable child deaths. Lancet. 2012;379(9832):2119–2120. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60908-8.
    1. Ri G, Ae G, Re B. Ending preventable child death in a generation. JAMA. 2012;308(2):141–142.
    1. Usaid. Child Survival And Health Grants Program. 2014. (Accessed 6 April 2015).
    1. Ricca J, Kureshy N, Leban K, Prosnitz D, Ryan L. Community-based intervention packages facilitated by ngos demonstrate plausible evidence for child mortality impact. Health Policy Plan. 2014;29(2):204–216. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt005.
    1. Perry H, Sivan O, Bowman G, Casazza L, Edward A, Hansen K, Morrow M. Averting childhood deaths in resource-constrained settings through engagement with the community: an example from Cambodia. Essentials ofCommunity Health. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett (2010):169–74.
    1. Laughlin M. The care group difference: a guide to mobilizing community-based volunteer health educators (2nd edition). Baltimore: World Relief And The Child Survival Collaborations And Resources (Core) Group; 2010. .
    1. Hanold M, Wetzel C, Davis T. Care Groups: A Training Manual for Program Design and Implementation.Washington, DC: Technical and Operational Performance Support Program; 2014. .
    1. Core Group, Usaid, Relief W, Food For The Hungry. Care Group Results: Implementors. 2014. .
    1. Core Group, Usaid, Relief W, Food For The Hungry. Care Group Results Reports. 2014. .
    1. Edward A, Ernst P, Taylor C, Becker S, Mazive E, Perry H. Examining the evidence of under-five mortality reduction in a community-based programme in Gaza, Mozambique. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101(8):814–822. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.02.025.
    1. Davis T, Wetzel C, Hernandez Avilan E, Cecilia de Mendoza Lopes, Chase R, Winch P, Perry H. Reducing child global undernutrition at scale in Sofala Province, Mozambique, using Care Group Volunteers to communicate health messages to mothers. Global Health: Science and Practice 1, no. 1 (2013):35–51.
    1. Unicef. Child Info: Monitoring The Situation Of Children And Women. 2014. (Accessed 24 September 2014).
    1. Group C. Care Group Information. (Accessed 6 April 2015).
    1. Usaid. Program Evaluations. (Accessed 6 April 2015).
    1. Jhu Iip. List: The Lives Saved Tool. 2014. (Accessed 6 April 2014).
    1. Walker N, Fischer-Walker C, Bryce J, Bahl R, Cousens S. Effects crgoi. Standards for cherg reviews of intervention effects on child survival. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(Suppl 1):I21–I31. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq036.
    1. Jhu Iip. Institute For International Programs. 2014. (Accessed 6 April 2015).
    1. Walker N, Tam Y, Friberg I. Overview of the lives saved tool (list) BMC Public Health. 2013;13(Suppl 3):S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S1.
    1. Amouzou A, Habi O, Bensaïd K, Niger Countdown Case Study Working Group. Reduction in child mortality in Niger: a Countdown to 2015 country case study. The Lancet 380, no. 9848 (2012): 1169–78.
    1. Amouzou A, Richard S, Friberg I, Bryce J, Baqui A, Arifeen S, Walker N. How well does list capture mortality by wealth quintile? a comparison of measured versus modelled mortality rates among children under-five in Bangladesh. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39 Suppl 1:I186–92.
    1. Ik F, Za B, Gl D, et al. Comparing modelled predictions of neonatal mortality impacts using list with observed results of community-based intervention trials in south Asia. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(Suppl 1):I11–I20.
    1. Hazel E, Gilroy K, Friberg I, Black R, Bryce J, Jones G. Comparing modelled to measured mortality reductions: applying the lives saved tool to evaluation data from the accelerated child survival programme in west Africa. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(Suppl 1):I32–I39. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq019.
    1. Larsen D, Friberg I, Eisele T. Comparison of lives saved tool model child mortality estimates against measured data from vector control studies in Sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Public Health. 2011;11 Suppl 3:S34.
    1. Ricca J, Prosnitz D, Perry H, et al. Comparing estimates of child mortality reduction modelled in list with pregnancy history survey data for a community-based Ngo project in Mozambique. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(Suppl 3):S35. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S35.
    1. Usaid. Program Evaluations. 2014. (Accessed 6 April 2015).
    1. Ea S. Developing practical recommendations for the Use of propensity scores: discussion of’A critical appraisal of propensity score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003’ by peter Austin, statistics in medicine. Stat Med. 2008;27(12):2062–2065. doi: 10.1002/sim.3207.
    1. Prost A, Colbourn T, Seward N, Azad K, Coomarasamy A, Copas A, Houwelinget T, et al. Women’s groups practising participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in Low-resource settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2013;381(9879):1736–46.
    1. Ricca J.2007. Child Survival Projects With Highly Effective Community Mobilization Have High Impact At Low Cost. Washington, Dc: Care Group Working Group; 11 January 2007.
    1. Getahun H, Davis T.2012. Using Care Groups To Build Resilience In Food Security And Community Health Programs. Addis Abbaba, Ethiopia: Care Group Working Group; 11–13 June 2013.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner