Needle with a novel attachment versus conventional screw-thread needles: a preference and usability test among adults with diabetes and impaired manual dexterity

Birtha Hansen, Søren K Lilleøre, Gitte Ter-Borch, Birtha Hansen, Søren K Lilleøre, Gitte Ter-Borch

Abstract

Background: NovoTwist(®) (Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsværd, Denmark) is an insulin pen needle that features a novel attachment and detachment system. The aim of this test was to assess overall preference and handling of NovoTwist compared with conventional screw-thread needles in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

Methods: One hundred twenty adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and manual dexterity dysfunction who were currently self-injecting with an insulin pen were included in this open-label, randomized, crossover test. Participants were stratified according to the impact that manual dexterity problems had on their ability to inject insulin (1 = no effect at all; 4 = a lot), and those rated as 1 were excluded from subanalyses because of low numbers. Following instruction, participants attached the needle to Next Generation FlexPen(®) (Novo Nordisk A/S), made an injection into a foam cushion, and detached the needle; this process was repeated three times with NovoTwist and the participant's current screw-thread needle (or NovoFine(®) [Novo Nordisk A/S]) in a random order. Responses to questions on user experience with each needle were subsequently recorded on a 6-point rating scale (1 = very difficult; 6 = very easy).

Results: Significantly more respondents had a preference for NovoTwist (79%) compared with the conventional screw-thread needles (21%, P < 0.001). Significantly more respondents preferred NovoTwist for both ease of attachment (80%, P < 0.001) and ease of detachment (74%, P < 0.001). Most respondents found NovoTwist the most appropriate needle for performing everyday injections (71%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Such preference by patients has a positive impact on the treatment of diabetes as NovoTwist may alleviate the burden of performing everyday injections through its ease of use.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Overall preference for use of NovoTwist compared with conventional screw-thread needles among people with diabetes and impaired manual dexterity (n = 118) and overall preference (n = 120).
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Ease of use of NovoTwist among 120 people with diabetes and motor dysfunction. Evaluation was based on a 6-point rating scale, where 1 = very difficult and 6 = very easy.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Preferences for (left panel) attachment and (right panel) detachment of NovoTwist compared with conventional screw-thread needles.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner