Classifying emergency 30-day readmissions in England using routine hospital data 2004-2010: what is the scope for reduction?

Ian Blunt, Martin Bardsley, Amy Grove, Aileen Clarke, Ian Blunt, Martin Bardsley, Amy Grove, Aileen Clarke

Abstract

Background: Many health systems across the globe have introduced arrangements to deny payment for patients readmitted to hospital as an emergency. The purpose of this study was to develop an exploratory categorisation based on likely causes of readmission, and then to assess the prevalence of these different types.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 82 million routinely collected National Health Service hospital records in England (2004-2010) was undertaken using anonymised linkage of records at person-level. Numbers of 30-day readmissions were calculated. Exploratory categorisation of readmissions was applied using simple rules relating to International Classification of Diseases (ICD) diagnostic codes for both admission and readmission.

Results: There were 5 804 472 emergency 30-day readmissions over a 6-year period, equivalent to 7.0% of hospital discharges. Readmissions were grouped into hierarchically exclusive categories: potentially preventable readmission (1 739 519 (30.0% of readmissions)); anticipated but unpredictable readmission (patients with chronic disease or likely to need long-term care; 1 141 987 (19.7%)); preference-related readmission (53 718 (0.9%)); artefact of data collection (16 062 (0.3%)); readmission as a result of accident, coincidence or related to a different body system (1 101 818 (19.0%)); broadly related readmission (readmission related to the same body system (1 751 368 (30.2%)).

Conclusions: In this exploratory categorisation, a large minority of emergency readmissions (eg, those that are potentially preventable or due to data artefacts) fell into groups potentially amenable to immediate reduction. For other categories, a hospital's ability to reduce emergency readmission is less clear. Reduction strategies and payment incentives must be carefully tailored to achieve stated aims.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Monthly emergency readmission rates for England 2004/05 to 2009/10. (The dip in readmission rates in the last month of the study period (March 2010) is likely to be an artefact due to an end of year increase in discharges.)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of emergency readmissions within 30 days as a function of number days between discharge and readmission.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Process of assigning readmissions by descending category (columns) and the final proportions (pie chart), using the average annual number of readmissions.

References

    1. Blunt I, Bardsley M, Dixon J. Trends in emergency admissions in England 2004–2009: is greater efficiency breeding inefficiency? London: The Nuffield Trust, 2010.
    1. Podulka J, Barrett M, Jiang J, et al. 0-Day Readmissions following Hospitalizations for Chronic vs. Acute Conditions, 2008 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Statistical Brief #127 February 2012.
    1. Robinson P. Hospital readmissions and the 30 day threshold. London: CHKS, 2010.
    1. Department of Health. Payment by results guidance for 2012–13. Gateway reference 17250. London: Department of Health, 2012.
    1. Centres for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Readmissions Reduction Program. 2013.
    1. Clarke A. Are readmissions avoidable? BMJ 1990;301:1136–8.
    1. Clarke A. Readmission to hospital: a measure of quality or outcome? Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:10–1.
    1. Williams S, Bottle A, Aylin P. Length of hospital stay and subsequent emergency readmission. BMJ 2005;331:371.
    1. van Walraven C, Jennings A, Forster A. A meta-analysis of hospital 30-day avoidable readmission rates. J Eval Clin Pract 2012;(18):1211–8.
    1. Billings J, Dixon J, Mijanovich T, et al. Case finding for patients at risk of readmission to hospital: development of algorithm to identify high risk patients. BMJ 2006;333:327–30.
    1. Halfon P, Eggli Y, Prêtre-Rohrbach I, et al. Validation of the potentially avoidable hospital readmission rate as a routine indicator of the quality of hospital care. Med Care 2006;44:972–81.
    1. Donze J, Lipsitz S, Bates B, et al. Causes and patters on readmissions in patients with common comorbidities: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2013;347:f7171.
    1. Lynn J, Straube BM, Bell KM, et al. Using population segmentation to provide better health care for all: the “Bridges to Health” model. Millbank Q 2007;85:2.
    1. Hansen LO, Young RS, Hinami K, et al. Interventions to reduce 30-day rehospitalization: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:520–8.
    1. Ashton CM, Wray NP. A conceptual framework for the study of early readmission as an indicator of quality of care. Soc Sci Med 1996;43:1533–41.
    1. Hasan M. Readmission of patients to hospital: still ill defined and poorly understood. Int J Qual Health Care 2001;13:177–9.
    1. van Walraven C, Bennett C, Jennings A, et al. Proportion of hospital readmissions deemed avoidable: a systematic review. CMAJ 2011;183:E391–402.
    1. Graham H, Livesley B. Can readmissions to a geriatric medical unit be prevented? Lancet 1983;1:404–6.
    1. Goldfield NI, McCullough EC, Hughes JS, et al. Identifying potentially preventable readmissions. Health Care Financ Rev 2008;30:75–91.
    1. Health & Social Care Information Centre. Monthly Hospital Episode Statistics for Admitted Pateint Care, Outpatients and Accidence and Emergency Data – April 2004 to May 2010. Leeds Information Centre.
    1. Statistical Analysis Software.
    1. Ulm K. A simple method to calculate the confidence interval of a standardized mortality ratio. Am J Epidemiol 1990;131:373–5.
    1. Heggestad T, Lilleeng SE. Measuring readmissions: focus on the time factor. Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15:147–54.
    1. Goldfield N. How important is it to identify avoidable hospital readmissions with certainty? CMAJ 2011;183:E368–9.
    1. Vest JR, Gamm LD, Oxford BA, et al. Determinants of preventable readmissions in the United States: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2010;5:88 The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:
    1. Shwartz M, Cohen AB, Restuccia JD, et al. How well can we identify the high-performing hospital? Med Care Res Rev 2011;68:290–310.
    1. Nuffield Trust. Predictive risk and health care: an overview. London: Nuffield Trust, 2011.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner