Empagliflozin as adjunct to insulin in Japanese participants with type 1 diabetes: Results of a 4-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial

Akira Shimada, Toshiaki Hanafusa, Atsutaka Yasui, Ganghyuck Lee, Yusuke Taneda, Akiko Sarashina, Kosuke Shiki, Jyothis George, Nima Soleymanlou, Jan Marquard, Akira Shimada, Toshiaki Hanafusa, Atsutaka Yasui, Ganghyuck Lee, Yusuke Taneda, Akiko Sarashina, Kosuke Shiki, Jyothis George, Nima Soleymanlou, Jan Marquard

Abstract

Aims: This phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02702011) with 4 sites in Japan investigated the pharmacodynamics (PD), pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety profile of empagliflozin in Japanese participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) as adjunctive therapy to insulin.

Materials and methods: Participants using multiple daily injections of insulin for ≥12 months, with HbA1c of 7.5%-10.0%, entered a 2-week, open-label, placebo run-in period, followed by a 4-week, double-blind period during which participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive empagliflozin 2.5 mg (n = 13), empagliflozin 10 mg (n = 12), empagliflozin 25 mg (n = 12) or placebo (n = 11). The primary objective was to assess the effect of empagliflozin vs placebo on urinary glucose excretion (UGE) after 7 days of treatment.

Results: PD: Empagliflozin resulted in a dose-dependent significant increase in 24-hour UGE compared with placebo (UGE placebo-corrected mean [95% confidence interval] change from baseline: 2.5 mg, 65.10 [43.29, 86.90] g/24 h; 10 mg, 81.19 [58.80, 103.58] g/24 h; 25 mg, 98.11 [75.91, 120.31] g/24 h). After 4 weeks of treatment, UGE increase was associated with improved glycaemic control, reduced body weight and decreased insulin needs. Empagliflozin treatment also resulted in dose-dependent increases in serum ketone bodies and free fatty acids. PK: Plasma empagliflozin levels increased in a dose-dependent manner and peaked at 1.5 hours. In this short study, empagliflozin was well tolerated, with no increase in rate of hypoglycaemia and no diabetic ketoacidosis events reported.

Conclusions: Based on this short-duration phase 2 study, the PK/PD profile of empagliflozin in Japanese participants with T1DM is comparable to that of non-Japanese participants.

Keywords: SGLT2 inhibitor; empagliflozin; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; randomized trial; type 1 diabetes.

© 2018 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Change in UGE and efficacy parameters. A, Mean UGE (±SE) over 28 days. B, Adjusted mean (±SE) change from baseline in HbA1c on Day 28. C, Adjusted mean (±SE) change from baseline in FPG on Day 28. D, Adjusted mean (±SE) change from baseline in recorded insulin dose within Week 4. E, Adjusted mean (±SE) change from baseline in body weight on Day 28. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; Empa, empagliflozin; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; h, hours; SE, standard error; UGE, urinary glucose excretion. a % of adjusted mean change from baseline
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in glucose exposure, glucose variability and time spent with glucose in target range. A, adjusted mean (±SE) change from baseline in MDAUC of glucose within Week 4. B, Adjusted mean (±SE) change from baseline in the IQR of glucose within Week 4. C, Ambulatory glucose profiles (mg/dL) within Week 4. D, Percentage of time with glucose ≤70 mg/dL, >70 to ≤180 mg/dL, and >180 mg/dL at baseline and at Week 4. Abbreviations: P10, 10th percentile; P25, 25th percentile; P75, 75th percentile; P90, 90th percentile
Figure 3
Figure 3
Serum β‐hydroxybutyrate profile. A, Mean (±SD) change from baseline in AUC0‐24h for serum BHB on Day 7. B, Boxplots for serum β‐hydroxybutyrate at baseline and on Day 28 (descriptive statistics). Abbreviations: AUC, area under the concentration‐time curve; BHB, β‐hydroxybutyrate; D, Day; Empa, empagliflozin; P10, 10th percentile; P25, 25th percentile; P75, 75th percentile; P90, 90th percentile; SD, standard deviation

References

    1. American Diabetes Association . Standards of medical care in diabetes 2017. . Accessed October 12, 2017.
    1. Home P, Haddad J, Latif ZA, et al. Comparison of national/regional diabetes guidelines for the management of blood glucose control in non‐Western countries. Diabetes Ther. 2013;4:91‐102.
    1. Gubitosi‐Klug RA, Braffett BH, White NH, et al. Risk of severe hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes over 30 years of follow‐up in the DCCT/EDIC study. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:1010‐1016.
    1. Frandsen CS, Dejgaard TF, Madsbad S. Non‐insulin drugs to treat hyperglycaemia in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4:766‐780.
    1. Mathieu C, Gillard P, Benhalima K. Insulin analogues in type 1 diabetes mellitus: getting better all the time. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13:385‐399.
    1. Qiao YC, Ling W, Pan YH, et al. Efficacy and safety of pramlintide injection adjunct to insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8:66504‐66515.
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Type 1 diabetes in adults: Diagnosis and management. . Accessed December 13, 2017.
    1. Al Khalifah RA, Alnhdi A, Alghar H, Alanazi M, Florez ID. The effect of adding metformin to insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus children: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Pediatr Diabetes. 2017;18:664‐673.
    1. Petrie JR, Chaturvedi N, Ford I, et al. Cardiovascular and metabolic effects of metformin in patients with type 1 diabetes (REMOVAL): a double‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:597‐609.
    1. Mathieu C, Zinman B, Hemmingsson JU, et al. Efficacy and safety of liraglutide added to insulin treatment in type 1 diabetes: the ADJUNCT ONE treat‐to‐target randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:1702‐1710.
    1. Garg SK, Henry RR, Banks P, et al. Effects of sotagliflozin added to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2337‐2348.
    1. Henry RR, Thakkar P, Tong C, Polidori D, Alba M. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin, a sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, as add‐on to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:2258‐2265.
    1. Rodbard HW, Peters AL, Slee A, Cao A, Traina SB, Alba M. The effect of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, on glycemic end points assessed by continuous glucose monitoring and patient‐reported outcomes among people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:171‐180.
    1. Dandona P, Mathieu C, Phillip M, et al. Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients with inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes (DEPICT‐1): 24 week results from a multicentre, double‐blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:864‐876.
    1. Biester T, Aschemeier B, Fath M, et al. Effects of dapagliflozin on insulin‐requirement, glucose excretion and beta‐hydroxybutyrate levels are not related to baseline HbA1c in youth with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:1635‐1639.
    1. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2117‐2128.
    1. Kaku K, Lee J, Mattheus M, et al. Empagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease‐ Results from EMPA‐REG OUTCOME(R). Circ J. 2017;81:227‐234.
    1. Wanner C, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, et al. Empagliflozin and progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:323‐334.
    1. Grempler R, Thomas L, Eckhardt M, et al. Empagliflozin, a novel selective sodium glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT‐2) inhibitor: characterisation and comparison with other SGLT‐2 inhibitors. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14:83‐90.
    1. Pieber TR, Famulla S, Eilbracht J, et al. Empagliflozin as adjunct to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes: a 4‐week, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial (EASE‐1). Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015;17:928‐935.
    1. Famulla S, Pieber TR, Eilbracht J, et al. Glucose exposure and variability with empagliflozin as adjunct to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes: continuous glucose monitoring data from a 4‐week, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial (EASE‐1). Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017;19:49‐60.
    1. Kanada S, Koiwai K, Taniguchi A, Sarashina A, Seman L, Woerle HJ. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of 4 weeks' treatment with empagliflozin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Investig. 2013;4:613‐617.
    1. Bonora BM, Avogaro A, Fadini GP. Sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors and diabetic ketoacidosis: an updated review of the literature. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018;20:25‐33.
    1. Nishimura R, Tanaka Y, Koiwai K, et al. Effect of empagliflozin monotherapy on postprandial glucose and 24‐hour glucose variability in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, 4‐week study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015;14:11.
    1. Kanikarla‐Marie P, Jain SK. Hyperketonemia and ketosis increase the risk of complications in type 1 diabetes. Free Radic Biol Med. 2016;95:268‐277.
    1. Dhatariya KK, Vellanki P. Treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)/hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state (HHS): novel advances in the management of hyperglycemic crises (UK versus USA). Curr Diab Rep. 2017;17:33.
    1. Perkins BA, Cherney DZ, Partridge H, et al. Sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition and glycemic control in type 1 diabetes: results of an 8‐week open‐label proof‐of‐concept trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:1480‐1483.
    1. Geerlings S, Fonseca V, Castro‐Diaz D, List J, Parikh S. Genital and urinary tract infections in diabetes: impact of pharmacologically‐induced glucosuria. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103:373‐381.
    1. Zijlstra E, Heise T, Nosek L, Heinemann L, Heckermann S. Continuous glucose monitoring: quality of hypoglycaemia detection. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15:130‐135.
    1. Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:982‐992.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner