Comparison of bioimpedance and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for measurement of fat mass in hemodialysis patients

Abstract

Background: Fat mass (FM) is measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), but is expensive and not portable. Multifrequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) measures total body water (TBW), intracellular water (ICW) and extracellular water (ECW). FM is calculated by subtracting fat-free mass (FFM) from weight assuming a fractional hydration of FFM of 0.73. Hemodialysis (HD) patients, however, have nonphysiologic expansion of ECW. Our aim was to apply a model to estimate FM in HD patients and controls.

Methods: We estimated the hydration of FFM in healthy subjects and HD patients with BIS (Impedimed multifrequency) assuming a hydration of 0.73 or using a model allowing ECW and ICW to vary, deriving a value for FM accounting for variances in ECW and ICW. FM was measured by DXA (Hologic Discovery W) in 25 controls and in 11 HD patients. We measured TBW, ECW and ICW with BIS and calculated FM using either weight - TBW/0.73 or with a model accounting for variations in ECW/ICW to estimate FM.

Results: ECW/ICW was greater in HD patients than in controls (0.83 ± 0.08 vs. 0.76 ± 0.04; p = 0.001). FM (kg) measured by DXA or estimated from TBW using constant hydration or accounting for variations in ECW/ICW was not significantly different in controls or in HD patients. Values obtained by all methods correlated (p < 0.001) and none of the Bland-Altman plots regressed (r(2) = 0.00). FM measured by DXA and by BIS in both controls and HD patients combined correlated (r(2) = 0.871).

Conclusion: Expansion of ECW in HD patients is statistically significant; however, the effect on hydration of FFM was insufficient to cause significant deviation from values derived using a hydration value of 0.73 within the range of expansion of ECW in the HD patient population studied here.

Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Figures

Fig 1

Correlation between Fat Mass Measured in Hemodialysis patients by DXA, BIS and Variable Hydration Formula.

Fig 2

Correlation between Fat Mass Measured in Control group by DXA, BIS and Variable Hydration Formula.

Fig. 3

Bland-Altman Plot for Fat Mass by DXA vs BIS (left side) and DXA vs Model (right side) in Control group.

Fig. 4

Bland-Altman Plot for Fat Mass by DXA vs BIS (left side) and DXA vs Model (right side) in Hemodialysis patients.

Fig. 5

Correlation between Fat Mass Measured by BIS and DXA in Control and Hemodialysis Patients.