Health professionals learning qualitative research in their workplace: a focused ethnography

Luca Ghirotto, Ludovica De Panfilis, Silvia Di Leo, Luca Ghirotto, Ludovica De Panfilis, Silvia Di Leo

Abstract

Background: The interest for qualitative research methodology has expanded beyond theoretical academic research on medical education, gathering interest from all healthcare professionals. Qualitative research has potentials in exploring the social, emotional, psychological aspects of care and in broadening professionals' scientific competencies. Nonetheless, qualitative research has still not been embraced within formal and academic curricula for future professionals, preventing newer generations from appreciating the value of its epistemological and methodological aspects and from using it in the development and implementation of clinical research. The purpose of this study was to comprehend the attitudes of health professionals learning and conducting qualitative studies within a practical training program developed in their workplace.

Methods: The present work consisted of a focused ethnography, including 14 professionals during their one-year attendance training on qualitative research methodology. Strategies used for collecting data included participant observations, field notes, semi-structured interviews, and a focus group. All the data were analyzed consistently with ethnographic indications.

Results: Analyses allowed us to evidence the educational, motivational, group-related and organizational factors influencing the attitudes and skill acquisition of healthcare professionals learning and conducting qualitative research within a practical training program developed in their workplace. Prior educational background was perceived as a sort of barrier. Nonetheless, the training boosted a change in attitude both in terms of appreciation of the research approach and trainees' emotional involvement with research participants. Doing a qualitative study in a multidisciplinary team raised in-group dynamics that hindered bringing the studies to conclusion. Trainees repeatedly lamented the difficulty in managing time to devote to research-related activities and questioned the feasibility of adopting this methodology for conducting research in their workplace.

Conclusions: Continual education training on the methodological aspects and practical implications of qualitative research may foster a renewed attitude towards one's professional education, while making inter-professional relationship issues emerge. Nonetheless, broadening the perspectives of professionals on their clinical practice by means of learning qualitative methodology may have an evident quality improvement return. Strategies for future qualitative research methodology hands-on training addressed to health professionals in continuing education are proposed.

Keywords: Cancer Research; Clinical Cancer center; Continuing learning; Continuing medical education; Healthcare professionals; Professional development; Qualitative Research methods; Research skills.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Bunniss S, Kelly DR. Research paradigms in medical education research. Med Educ. 2010;44:358–366. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03611.x.
    1. Wilson I. Qualitative research in medical education. Med Educ. 2010;44:942. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03763.x.
    1. Dornan T, Kelly M. What use is qualitative research? Med Educ. 2017;51:7–9. doi: 10.1111/medu.13229.
    1. von Unger H, Werwick K, Lichte T, Herrmann M. Learning about general practice through qualitative interviews: lessons from a seminar course with medical students. Med Teach. 2010;32:e127–e132. doi: 10.3109/01421590903449902.
    1. Arieli D, Tamir B, Man M. Teaching qualitative research as a means of socialization to nursing. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35:795–799. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.02.021.
    1. Rosenkranz SK. Wang S, Hu. W Motivating medical students to do research: a mixed methods study using Self-Determination Theory BMC Med Educ. 2015;15:95.
    1. Reising DL. Establishing student competency in qualitative research: can undergraduate nursing students perform qualitative data analysis. J Nurs Educ. 2003;42:216–219.
    1. Charmaz K. Teaching theory construction with initial grounded theory tools: a reflection on lessons and learning. Qual Health Res. 2015;25:1610–1622. doi: 10.1177/1049732315613982.
    1. Britten N. Making sense of qualitative research: a new series. Med Educ. 2005;39:5–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02024.x.
    1. Hein SF. "I don't like ambiguity": an exploration of students' experiences during a qualitative methods course. Alberta J Educ Res. 2004;50:22–38.
    1. Cooper R, Fleischer A, Cotton FA. Building connections: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of qualitative research: students’ learning experiences. TQR. 2012;17:1–16.
    1. Calderón C. La enseñanza-aprendizaje de la investigación cualitativa en el medio sanitario. Cien Saude Colet. 2012;17:595–602. doi: 10.1590/S1413-81232012000300004.
    1. Featherstone VA, Barbour RS, Garner J. A reflection on ten years’ experience of providing qualitative research training in primary care. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2007;8:198–206. doi: 10.1017/S1463423607000242.
    1. Hepworth J, Kay M. General practitioners learning qualitative research: a case study of postgraduate education. Aust Fam Physician. 2015;44:760–763.
    1. Eakin JM, Mykhalovskiy E. Teaching Against the Grain: A Workshop on Teaching Qualitative Research in the Health Sciences. Conference Report: A National Workshop on Teaching Qualitative Research in the Health Sciences. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2005;6:43 paragraphs.
    1. Ng SL, Bisaillon L, Webster F. Blurring the boundaries: using institutional ethnography to inquire into health professions education and practice. Med Educ. 2017;51:51–60. doi: 10.1111/medu.13050.
    1. Andreassen P, Christensen MK, Møller JE. Focused ethnography as an approach in medical education research. Med Educ. 2020;00:1–7.
    1. Harris KJ, Jerome NW, Fawcett SB. Rapid assessment procedures: a review and critique. Hum Organ. 1997;56:375–378. doi: 10.17730/humo.56.3.w525025611458003.
    1. Higginbottom GMA, Pillay JJ, Boadu NY. Guidance on performing focused ethnographies with an emphasis on healthcare Research. TQR. 2013;18:1–16.
    1. Reeves S, Peller J, Goldman J, Kitto S. Ethnography in qualitative educational research: AMEE guide no. 80. Med Teach. 2013;35:e1365–e1379. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.804977.
    1. Hannum SM, Dy SM, Smith KC, et al. Proposed criteria for systematic evaluation of Qualitative oncology Research. J Oncol Pract. 2019;15:523–529. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00125.
    1. Henwood K, Pidgeon N. Grounded theory in psychological research. In: Camic PM, Rhodes JE, Yardley L, editors. Qualitative research in psychology: expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2003. pp. 131–155.
    1. Losi E, Guberti M, Ghirotto L, Di Leo S, Bassi MC, Costi S. Undergoing head and neck cancer surgery: A grounded theory. Eur J Cancer Care. 2019;e13062. 10.1111/ecc.13062.
    1. Denzin N. Interpretative interactionism. London: SAGE; 1989.
    1. Roper JM, Shapira J. Ethnography in nursing Research. SAGE: Thousands Oaks, CA; 2000.
    1. Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography: principles in practice. New York: Routledge; 2007.
    1. Robinson SG. The relevancy of ethnography to nursing Research. Nurs Sci Q. 2013;26:14–19. doi: 10.1177/0894318412466742.
    1. Kuper A, Reeves S, Albert M, Hodges BD. Assessment: do we need to broaden our methodological horizons? Med Educ. 2007;41:1121–1123. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02945.x.
    1. Johansson EE, Risberg G, Hamber K. Is qualitative research scientific, or merely relevant? Research-interested primary care and hospital physicians' appraisal of abstracts. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2003;21:10–14. doi: 10.1080/02813430310000492.
    1. Goguen J, Knight M, Tiberius R. Is it science? A study of the attitudes of medical trainees and physicians toward qualitative and quantitative research. Adv Health Sci Edu Theory Pract. 2008;13:659–674. doi: 10.1007/s10459-007-9072-4.
    1. Dìaz Crescitelli ME, Ghirotto L, Artioli G, Sarli L. Opening the horizons of clinical reasoning to qualitative research. Acta Biomed. 2019;90:8–16.
    1. Parsons GN, Kinsman SB, Ubel PA. Encourage qualitative research to improve students' clinical skills! Acad Med. 1998;73:933–934. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199809000-00009.
    1. Qualitative MJ, Research H. Creating a new discipline. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press; 2012.
    1. Todres L, Galvin KT, Holloway I. The humanization of healthcare: a value framework for qualitative research. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2009;4:68–77. doi: 10.1080/17482620802646204.
    1. Hunt MR, Mehta A, Chan LS. Learning to think qualitatively: experiences of graduate students conducting Qualitative Health Research. Int J Qual Methods. 2009;8:129–135. doi: 10.1177/160940690900800204.
    1. Mason OJ. Teaching qualitative research methods: some innovations and reflections on practice. Psychology Teaching Review. 2002;10:68–75.
    1. Roth W-M. Textbooks on Qualitative Research and Method/Methodology: Toward a Praxis of Method [63 paragraphs]. FQS. 2006;7, Art. 11.
    1. Eddy K, Jordan Z, Stephenson M. Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016;14:96–137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
    1. Brink EJ. Learning how to do research requires a mentor. West J Nurs Res. 1995;17:351–352. doi: 10.1177/019394599501700401.
    1. Morse JM. Learning to drive from a manual? Qual Health Res. 1997;7:181–183. doi: 10.1177/104973239700700201.
    1. Kuckelman Cobb A, Hoffart N. Teaching Qualitative Research through participatory coursework and mentorship. J Prof Nurs. 1999;15:331–339. doi: 10.1016/S8755-7223(99)80063-5.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner