Reductions in regimen distress are associated with improved management and glycemic control over time

Danielle Hessler, Lawrence Fisher, Russell E Glasgow, Lisa A Strycker, L Miriam Dickinson, Patricia A Arean, Umesh Masharani, Danielle Hessler, Lawrence Fisher, Russell E Glasgow, Lisa A Strycker, L Miriam Dickinson, Patricia A Arean, Umesh Masharani

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations among regimen distress (RD), self-management, and glycemic control were undertaken to explore mechanisms of operation among these variables. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In a behavioral randomized control trial (RCT) to reduce RD, 392 adults with type 2 diabetes were assessed for RD, diet, exercise, medication adherence, and HbA1c at baseline and at 4 and 12 months. Associations among RD, self-management, and HbA1c were examined in cross-sectional analyses at baseline, in prospective analyses using baseline values to predict change over time, and in time-varying analyses. RESULTS At baseline, greater RD and poorer medication adherence were independently associated with higher HbA1c (P = 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively), and greater RD was associated with poorer medication adherence (P = 0.03). No consistent pattern of significant prospective associations was found. Significant time-varying findings showed that decreases in RD were associated with improvements in medication adherence (P < 0.01), physical activity (P < 0.001), and HbA1c (P = 0.02) over time following intervention. Changes in self-management were not associated with changes in HbA1c over time. CONCLUSIONS In the context of an RCT to reduce distress, RD, self-management, and HbA1c were interrelated in cross-sectional and time-varying analyses. Decreases in RD were associated with improvements in both self-management and HbA1c over 12 months. Findings point to the complex and likely multifaceted pathways of association among these key constructs, with results indicating significant linkages between RD and both self-management and glycemic control over time.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00714441.

References

    1. Gonzalez JS, Fisher L, Polonsky WH. Depression in diabetes: have we been missing something important? Diabetes Care 2011;34:236–239
    1. Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Strycker LA. The relationship between diabetes distress and clinical depression with glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1034–1036
    1. Fisher L, Mullan JT, Arean P, Glasgow RE, Hessler D, Masharani U. Diabetes distress but not clinical depression or depressive symptoms is associated with glycemic control in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Diabetes Care 2010;33:23–28
    1. Tsujii S, Hayashino Y, Ishii H, Diabetes Distress and Care Registry at Tenri Study Group Diabetes distress, but not depressive symptoms, is associated with glycaemic control among Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: Diabetes Distress and Care Registry at Tenri (DDCRT 1). Diabet Med 2012;29:1451–1455
    1. Fisher L, Skaff MM, Mullan JT, et al. Clinical depression versus distress among patients with type 2 diabetes: not just a question of semantics. Diabetes Care 2007;30:542–548
    1. Aikens JE. Prospective associations between emotional distress and poor outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2012;35:2472–2478
    1. Umpierre D, Ribeiro PA, Kramer CK, et al. Physical activity advice only or structured exercise training and association with HbA1c levels in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011;305:1790–1799
    1. Rhee MK, Slocum W, Ziemer DC, et al. Patient adherence improves glycemic control. Diabetes Educ 2005;31:240–250
    1. Peyrot MF. Theory in behavioral diabetes research. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1703–1705
    1. Peyrot M, McMurry JF, Jr, Kruger DF. A biopsychosocial model of glycemic control in diabetes: stress, coping and regimen adherence. J Health Soc Behav 1999;40:141–158
    1. Hanson CL, Henggeler SW, Burghen G. Model of associations between psychosocial variables and health-outcome measures of adolescents with IDDM. Diabetes Care 1987;10:752–758
    1. Lloyd C, Smith J, Weinger K. Stress and diabetes: a review of the links. Diabetes Spectrum 2005;18:121–127
    1. Golden SH, Lazo M, Carnethon M, et al. Examining a bidirectional association between depressive symptoms and diabetes. JAMA 2008;299:2751–2759
    1. Mezuk B, Eaton WW, Albrecht S, Golden SH. Depression and type 2 diabetes over the lifespan: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2008;31:2383–2390
    1. Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Mullan JT, Skaff MM, Polonsky WH. Development of a brief diabetes distress screening instrument. Ann Fam Med 2008;6:246–252
    1. Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J, et al. Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the Diabetes Distress Scale. Diabetes Care 2005;28:626–631
    1. Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care 2000;23:943–950
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606–613
    1. Fisher L, Hessler DM, Glasgow RE, et al. REDEEM: a pragmatic trial to reduce diabetes distress. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2551–2558
    1. Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gagnier JJ, et al. CONSORT group. Pragmatic Trials in Healthcare (Practihc) group Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ 2008;337:a2390.
    1. Glasgow RE, Kurz D, King DK, et al. Outcomes of minimal and moderate support versions of an internet-based diabetes self-management support program. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:1315–1322
    1. Glasgow RE, Christiansen SM, Kurz D, et al. Engagement in a diabetes self-management website: usage patterns and generalizability of program use. J Med Internet Res 2011;13:e9
    1. Arean P, Hegel M, Vannoy S, Fan MY, Unuzter J. Effectiveness of problem-solving therapy for older, primary care patients with depression: results from the IMPACT project. Gerontologist 2008;48:311–323
    1. Nezu AM. Problem solving and behavior therapy revisited. Behav Ther 2004;35:1–33
    1. Masharani U. Diabetes De-mystified: A Self-teaching Guide. New York, McGraw-Hill Books, 2007
    1. Stewart AL, Mills KM, King AC, Haskell WL, Gillis D, Ritter PL. CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33:1126–1141
    1. Harada ND, Chiu V, King AC, Stewart AL. An evaluation of three self-report physical activity instruments for older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33:962–970
    1. Thompson FE, Kipnis V, Subar AF, et al. Performance of a short instrument to estimate usual dietary intake of percent calories from fat. Eur J Clin Nutr 1998;52:S63
    1. Krousel-Wood M, Muntner P, Jannu A, Desalvo K, Re RN. Reliability of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. Am J Med Sci 2005;330:128–133
    1. NORM: Multiple Imputation of Incomplete Multivariate Data Under a Normal Model (Version 2) [Software]. University Park, PA, The Methodology Center, Penn: State, 1999
    1. Neuhaus JM, Kalbfleisch JD. Between- and within-cluster covariate effects in the analysis of clustered data. Biometrics 1998;54:638–645
    1. Hedeker D, Gibbons R. Mixed-effects regression models for continuous outcomes In Longitudinal Data Analyses Hedeker D, Gibbons R, Eds. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley & Sons, 2006, p. 69–76
    1. Steptoe A, Hamer M, Chida Y. The effects of acute psychological stress on circulating inflammatory factors in humans: a review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav Immun 2007;21:901–912
    1. Miller GE, Chen E, Zhou ES. If it goes up, must it come down? Chronic stress and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis in humans. Psychol Bull 2007;133:25–45
    1. Skaff MM, Mullan JT, Almeida DM, et al. Daily negative mood affects fasting glucose in type 2 diabetes. Health Psychol 2009;28:265–272
    1. Bocchieri LE, Meana M, Fisher BL. A review of psychosocial outcomes of surgery for morbid obesity. J Psychosom Res 2002;52:155–165
    1. Goodwin RD, Friedman HS. Health status and the five-factor personality traits in a nationally representative sample. J Health Psychol 2006;11:643–654
    1. Chapman BP, Duberstein PR, Sörensen S, Lyness JM. Personality and perceived health in older adults: the five factor model in primary care. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2006;61:362–365

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner