Efficacy of intraarticular botulinum toxin A and intraarticular hyaluronate plus rehabilitation exercise in patients with unilateral ankle osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial

Shu-Fen Sun, Chien-Wei Hsu, Huey-Shyan Lin, Yi-Jiun Chou, Jun-Yang Chen, Jue-Long Wang, Shu-Fen Sun, Chien-Wei Hsu, Huey-Shyan Lin, Yi-Jiun Chou, Jun-Yang Chen, Jue-Long Wang

Abstract

Background: There was an increasing requirement for novel treatments of osteoarthritis (OA). The aim was to compare the efficacy of intraarticular Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) and intraarticular hyaluronate plus rehabilitation exercise in patients with ankle OA.

Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded study with a 6-month follow-up period, conducted in the outpatient rehabilitation department at a university-affiliated tertiary care medical center. Seventy-five patients with symptomatic ankle OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2) were randomized to receive either a single 100-unit BoNT-A injection into the target ankle (n = 38) or a single hyaluronate injection plus 12 sessions of rehabilitation exercise (30 minutes/day, 3 times/week for 4 weeks) (n = 37). The primary outcome measure was the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS). Secondary outcome measures included American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle/Hindfoot Score, visual analog scale (VAS) for ankle pain, single leg stance test (SLS), Timed "Up-and-Go" test (TUG), consumption of rescue analgesics and global patient satisfaction.

Results: There were no significant between-group differences in total AOS scores, pain subscale and disability subscale scores (adjusted mean difference AMD = -0.2, 95% CI = (-0.5, 0.2), p = 0.39; AMD = -0.1, 95% CI = (-0.5, 0.3), p = 0.57; AMD = -0.2, 95% CI = (-0.6, 0.2), p = 0.36). The 2 groups showed no significant differences in AOFAS, VAS, SLS, TUG scores and consumption of rescue analgesics at each follow-up visit, except that the hyaluronate group improved more in SLS than the BoNT-A group at 1-month follow-up. Patients' satisfaction rate was high, with no serious adverse events. There was no difference in adverse events between the two groups (p = 1.00).

Conclusions: Treatment with intraarticular BoNT-A or hyaluronate injection plus rehabilitation exercise was associated with improvements in pain, physical function and balance in patients with ankle OA. These effects were rapid at 2 weeks and might last for at least 6 months. There was no difference in effectiveness between the two interventions.

Trial registration: The trial was registered at clinical trials.gov (Registry number NCT01760577).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of patients through the trial.

References

    1. Cushnaghan J, Dieppe P. Study of 500 patients with limb joint osteoarthritis: I. analysis by age, sex, and distribution of symptomatic joint sites. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991;50:8–13. doi: 10.1136/ard.50.1.8.
    1. Saltzman CL, Salamon ML, Blanchard M, Huff T, Hayes A, Buckwalter JA. et al.Epidemiology of ankle arthritis: report of a consectutive series of 639 patients from a tertiary orthopedic center. Iowa Orthop J. 2005;25:44–46.
    1. Rowland LP. Stroke, spasticity and botulinum toxin. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:382–383. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp020071.
    1. Mense S. Neurobiological basis for the use of botulinum toxin in pain therapy. J Neurol. 2004;251(1):11–17. doi: 10.1007/s00415-004-0321-7.
    1. Mahowald ML, Singh JA, Dykstra D. Long term effects of intra-articular botulinum toxin A for refractory joint pain. Neurotox Res. 2006;9:179–188. doi: 10.1007/BF03033937.
    1. Singh JA, Mahowald M, Kushnaryov A, Goelz E, Dykstra D. Repeat injections of intra-articular botulinum toxin a for the treatment of chronic arthritis joint pain. J Clin Rheumatol. 2009;15:35–38. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e3181953b14.
    1. Singh JA, Mahowald ML, Noorbaloochi S. Intra-articular botulinum toxin A for refractory shoulder pain: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Transl Res. 2009;153:205–216. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2009.02.004.
    1. Mahowald ML, Krug HE, Singh JA, Dykstra D. Intra-articular botulinum toxin type a: a new approach to treat arthritis joint pain. Toxicon. 2009;54:658–667. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.03.028.
    1. Frizziero L, Govoni E, Bachin P. Intraarticular hyaluronic acid in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: clinical and morphological study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1998;16:441–449.
    1. Adams ME, Atkinson MH, Lussier AJ, Schulz JI, Siminovitch KA, Wade JP, Zummer M. The role of viscosupplementation with hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc) in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a Canadian multicenter trial comparing hylan G-F 20 alone, hylan G-F 20 with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and NSAIDs alone. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1995;3:213–225. doi: 10.1016/S1063-4584(05)80013-5.
    1. Salk RS, Chang TJ, D’Costa WF, Soomekh DJ, Grogan KA. Sodium hyaluronate in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the ankle: a controlled, randomized, double blind pilot study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:295–302. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00193.
    1. Sun SF, Chou YJ, Hsu CW, Hwang CW, Hsu PT, Wang JL, Hsu YW, Chou MC. Efficacy of intra-articular hyaluronic acid in patients with osteoarthritis of the ankle: a prospective study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14:867–874. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.03.003.
    1. Sun SF, Hsu CW, Sun HP, Chou YJ, Li HJ, Wang JL. The effect of three weekly intra-articular injections of hyaluronate on pain, function, and balance in patients with unilateral ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1720–1726.
    1. Witteveen AGH, Giannini S, Guido G, Jerosch J, Lohrer H, Vannini F, Donati L, Schulz A, Scholl J, Sierevelt IN, van Dijk CN. A prospective multi-centre, open study of the safety and efficacy of hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc) in patients with symptomatic ankle (talo-crural) osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;14:145–152. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2008.01.001.
    1. Cohen MM, Altman RD, Hollstrom R, Hollstrom C, Sun C, Gipson B. Safety and efficacy of intra-articular sodium hyaluronate (Hyalgan) in a randomized, double blind study for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:657–663. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2008.0657.
    1. McGuire JB. Arthritis and related disease of the foot and ankle: rehabilitation and biomechanical considerations. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2003;20:469–485. doi: 10.1016/S0891-8422(03)00036-3.
    1. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16:494–502. doi: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494.
    1. Domsic RT, Saltzman CL. Ankle osteoarthritis scale. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19:466–471. doi: 10.1177/107110079801900708.
    1. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:349–353. doi: 10.1177/107110079401500701.
    1. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974;2:1127–1131.
    1. Hurvitz EA, Richardson JK, Werner RA, Ruhl AM, Dixon MR. Unipedal stance testing as an indicator of fall risk among older outpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:587–591. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90039-X.
    1. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142–148.
    1. Dworkin DH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Kerns RD, Ader DN, Brandenburg N, Burke LB, Cella D, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dimitrova R, Dionne R, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Katz NP, Kehlet H, Kramer LD, Manning DC, McCormick C, McDermott MP, McQuay HJ, Patel S, Porter L, Quessy S, Rappaport BA. et al.Consensus statement: interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008;9:105–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.09.005.
    1. Schaible HG, Schmelz M, Tegeder I. Pathophysiology and treatment of pain in joint disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58:323–342. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2006.01.011.
    1. Schaible HG, Richter F, Ebersberger A, Boettger MK, Vanegas H, Natura G, Vazquez E, Segond Von Banchet G. Joint pain. Exp Brain Res. 2009;196:153–162. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1782-9.
    1. Schaible HG. Peripheral and central mechanisms of pain generation. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2007;177:3–28.
    1. Konttinen YT, Kemppinen P, Segerberg M, Hukkanen M, Rees R, Santavirta S, Sorsa T, Pertovaara A, Polak JM. Peripheral and spinal neural mechanisms in arthritis, with particular reference to treatment of inflammation and pain. Arthiritis Rheum. 1994;37:965–982. doi: 10.1002/art.1780370701.
    1. Garrett NE, Mapp PI, Cruwys SC, Kidd BL, Blake DR. Role of substance P in inflammatory arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992;51:1014–1018. doi: 10.1136/ard.51.8.1014.
    1. Welch MJ, Purkiss JR, Foster KA. Sensitivity of embryonic rat dorsal root ganglia neurons to Clostridium botulinum neurotoxins. Toxicon. 2000;38:245–258. doi: 10.1016/S0041-0101(99)00153-1.
    1. Freund B, Schwartz M. Temporal relationship of muscle weakness and pain reduction in subjects treated with botulinum toxin A. J Pain. 2003;4:159–165. doi: 10.1054/jpai.2003.435.
    1. Arezzo JC. Possible mechanisms for the effects of botulinum toxin on pain. Clin J Pain. 2002;18(l):S125–132.
    1. Durham PL, Cady R, Cady R. Regulation of calcitonin gene-related peptide secretion from trigeminal nerve cells by botulinum toxin type A: implications for migraine therapy. Headache. 2004;44:35–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2004.04007.x.
    1. Hubbard TJ, Hicks-Little C, Cordova M. Mechanical and sensorimotor implications with ankle osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1136–1141. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.020.
    1. Fisher NM, Pendergast DR. Reduced muscle function in patients with osteoarthritis. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1997;29:213–221.
    1. Hassan BS, Mockett S, Doherty M. Static postural sway, proprioception, and maximal voluntary quadriceps contraction in patients with knee osteoarthritis and normal control subjects. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;60:612–618. doi: 10.1136/ard.60.6.612.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner