Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluation of a Gender Equity and Family Planning Intervention for Married Men and Couples in Rural India

Anita Raj, Mohan Ghule, Julie Ritter, Madhusudana Battala, Velhal Gajanan, Saritha Nair, Anindita Dasgupta, Jay G Silverman, Donta Balaiah, Niranjan Saggurti, Anita Raj, Mohan Ghule, Julie Ritter, Madhusudana Battala, Velhal Gajanan, Saritha Nair, Anindita Dasgupta, Jay G Silverman, Donta Balaiah, Niranjan Saggurti

Abstract

Background: Despite ongoing recommendations to increase male engagement and gender-equity (GE) counseling in family planning (FP) services, few such programs have been implemented and rigorously evaluated. This study evaluates the impact of CHARM, a three-session GE+FP counseling intervention delivered by male health care providers to married men, alone (sessions 1&2) and with their wives (session 3) in India.

Methods and findings: A two-armed cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted with young married couples (N = 1081 couples) recruited from 50 geographic clusters (25 clusters randomized to CHARM and a control condition, respectively) in rural Maharashtra, India. Couples were surveyed on demographics, contraceptive behaviors, and intimate partner violence (IPV) attitudes and behaviors at baseline and 9 &18-month follow-ups, with pregnancy testing at baseline and 18-month follow-up. Outcome effects on contraceptive use and incident pregnancy, and secondarily, on contraceptive communication and men's IPV attitudes and behaviors, were assessed using logistic generalized linear mixed models. Most men recruited from CHARM communities (91.3%) received at least one CHARM intervention session; 52.5% received the couple's session with their wife. Findings document that women from the CHARM condition, relative to controls, were more likely to report contraceptive communication at 9-month follow-up (AOR = 1.77, p = 0.04) and modern contraceptive use at 9 and 18-month follow-ups (AORs = 1.57-1.58, p = 0.05), and they were less likely to report sexual IPV at 18-month follow-up (AOR = 0.48, p = 0.01). Men in the CHARM condition were less likely than those in the control clusters to report attitudes accepting of sexual IPV at 9-month (AOR = 0.64, p = 0.03) and 18-month (AOR = 0.51, p = 0.004) follow-up, and attitudes accepting of physical IPV at 18-month follow-up (AOR = 0.64, p = 0.02). No significant effect on pregnancy was seen.

Conclusions: Findings demonstrate that men can be engaged in FP programming in rural India, and that such an approach inclusive of GE counseling can improve contraceptive practices and reduce sexual IPV in married couples.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01593943.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. CHARM Consort Figure.
Fig 1. CHARM Consort Figure.

References

    1. Alkema L, Kantorova V, Menozzi C, Biddlecom A. National, regional, and global rates and trends in contraceptive prevalence and unmet need for family planning between 1990 and 2015: a systematic and comprehensive analysis. Lancet. 2013;381(9878):1642–52. Epub 2013/03/16. 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62204-1 .
    1. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005–06: India: Volume I. Mumbai, IIPS: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International, 2007.
    1. Jejeebhoy SJ, Santhya KG, Zavier AJ. Demand for contraception to delay first pregnancy among young married women in India. Studies in family planning. 2014;45(2):183–201. Epub 2014/06/17. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00384.x .
    1. Raj A, McDougal L, Rusch ML. Effects of young maternal age and short interpregnancy interval on infant mortality in South Asia. International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 2014;124(1):86–7. Epub 2013/10/26. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4058333.
    1. Raju S L A. Men as supportive partners in reproductive health: Moving from rhetoric to reality. New Delhi, India: Population Council, 2000.
    1. Pachauri S. Priority strategies for India's family planning programme. The Indian journal of medical research. 2014;140 Suppl:S137–46.
    1. Karra MV, Stark NN, Wolf J. Male involvement in family planning: a case study spanning five generations of a south Indian family. Studies in family planning. 1997;28(1):24–34. .
    1. Pachauri S. Male involvement in reproductive health care. Journal of the Indian Medical Association. 2001;99(3):138–41. .
    1. Barua A, Pande RP, MacQuarrie K, Walia S. Caring Men? Husbands' Involvement in Maternal Care of Young Wives. Economic and Political Weekly. 2004;39(52):5661–8.
    1. Greene M, Barker G. Masculinity and its public health implications for sexual and reproductive health and HIV prevention In: P R, S M, editors. Handbook of global public health. London: Routledge; 2011.
    1. Ajah LO, Dim CC, Ezegwui HU, Iyoke CA, Ugwu EO. Male partner involvement in female contraceptive choices in Nigeria. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology: the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2014:1–4. 10.3109/01443615.2014.991287 .
    1. Mwaikambo L, Speizer IS, Schurmann A, Morgan G, Fikree F. What works in family planning interventions: a systematic review. Studies in family planning. 2011;42(2):67–82.
    1. Mishra A, Nanda P, Speizer IS, Calhoun LM, Zimmerman A, Bhardwaj R. Men's attitudes on gender equality and their contraceptive use in Uttar Pradesh India. Reprod Health. 2014;11:41 Epub 2014/06/05. 10.1186/1742-4755-11-41 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4051668.
    1. Ghule M, Raj A, Dasgupta A, Nair S, Saggurti N, Donta B. Barriers to use Contraceptive Methods among Rural Young Married Couples in Maharashtra, India: Qualitative Findings. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities. 2015;5 10.5958/2249-7315.2015.00132.x
    1. Silverman JG, Decker MR, Gupta J, Maheshwari A, Patel V, Raj A. HIV prevalence and predictors among rescued sex-trafficked women and girls in Mumbai, India. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999). 2006;43(5):588–93. Epub 2006/10/05. .
    1. Raj A, Dasgupta A, Goldson I, Lafontant D, Freeman E, Silverman JG. Pilot evaluation of the making employment needs [MEN] count intervention: addressing behavioral and structural HIV risks in heterosexual Black men. AIDS care. 2014;26(2):152–9. Epub 2013/06/19. 10.1080/09540121.2013.804901 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3823747.
    1. WHO, LSHTM, SARC. Global and regional estimates of violence against women Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, June 2013.
    1. Yore J, Dasgupta A, Ghule M, Battala M, Nair S, Silverman J, et al. CHARM, a gender equity and family planning intervention for men and couples in rural India: protocol for the cluster randomized controlled trial evaluation. Reprod Health. 2016;13(1):14 10.1186/s12978-016-0122-3
    1. WHO. Putting Women First: Ethical and Safety Recommendations for Research on Domestic Violence Against Women. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2001.
    1. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
    1. Connell RW. Gender and power: society, the person and sexual politics. Stanford, CA:: Stanford University Press; 1987.
    1. Warriner I. Theory-based interventions for contraception: Reproductive Health Library [RHL] commentary. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Last Revised April 1, 2012.
    1. India Go. Family Planning. Information, Education and Counseling (IEC) Materials. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India, 2015.
    1. Ghule M, Raj A, Palaye P, Dasgupta A, Nair S, Saggurti N, et al. Barriers to use of contraceptive methods among rural young married couples in Maharashtra, India: Qualitative Findings. Asian Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities. 2015;5(6):5–13.
    1. Yadav K, Singh B, Goswami K. Agreement and concordance regarding reproductive intentions and contraception between husbands and wives in rural ballabgarh, India. Indian journal of community medicine: official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. 2010;35(1):19–23. Epub 2010/07/08. 10.4103/0970-0218.62548 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2888358.
    1. Selvin S. Statistical Analysis of Epidemiologic Data. NY, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.
    1. Lundgren R, Cachan J, Jennings V. Engaging men in family planning services delivery: experiences introducing the Standard Days Method(R) in four countries. World Health Popul. 2012;14(1):44–51. Epub 2012/11/09. .
    1. Shattuck D, Kerner B, Gilles K, Hartmann M, Ng'ombe T, Guest G. Encouraging contraceptive uptake by motivating men to communicate about family planning: the Malawi Male Motivator project. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(6):1089–95. Epub 2011/04/16. 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300091 AJPH.2010.300091 [pii].
    1. Varkey LC, Mishra A, Das A, Ottolenghi E, Huntington D, Adamchak S, et al. Involving men in maternity care in India (FRONTIERS Final Report). Washington, D.C.: Population Counciil, 2004.
    1. MacDonald L, Jones L, Thomas P, Thu LT, FitzGerald S, Efroymson D. Promoting male involvement in family planning in Vietnam and India: HealthBridge experience. Gender & Development. 2013;21(1):31–45.
    1. Kunene B, Beksinska MZ, Mthembu N, Mullick S, Ottolenghi I, Kleinschmidt E, et al. Involving men in maternity care: South Africa (FRONTIERS Final Report). Washington, D.C.: Population Council, 2004.
    1. Pulerwitz J, Hughes L, Mehta M, Kidanu A, Verani F, Tewolde S. Changing Gender Norms and Reducing Intimate Partner Violence: Results From a Quasi-Experimental Intervention Study With Young Men in Ethiopia. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(1):132–7. Epub 2014/11/14. 10.2105/ajph.2014.302214
    1. Kyegombe N, Abramsky T, Devries KM, Starmann E, Michau L, Nakuti J, et al. The impact of SASA!, a community mobilization intervention, on reported HIV-related risk behaviours and relationship dynamics in Kampala, Uganda. J Int AIDS Soc. 2014;17:19232 Epub 2014/11/08. 10.7448/ias.17.1.19232
    1. Jewkes R, Nduna M, Levin J, Jama N, Dunkle K, Puren A, et al. Impact of stepping stones on incidence of HIV and HSV-2 and sexual behaviour in rural South Africa: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2008;337:a506 Epub 2008/08/09. 10.1136/bmj.a506
    1. Wagman JA, Gray RH, Campbell JC, Thoma M, Ndyanabo A, Ssekasanvu J, et al. Effectiveness of an integrated intimate partner violence and HIV prevention intervention in Rakai, Uganda: analysis of an intervention in an existing cluster randomised cohort. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(1):e23–33. Epub 2014/12/30. 10.1016/s2214-109x(14)70344-4
    1. Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception. 2011;83(5):397–404. Epub 2011/04/12. 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.021
    1. Gautham M, Shyamprasad KM, Singh R, Zachariah A, Singh R, Bloom G. Informal rural healthcare providers in North and South India. Health policy and planning. 2014;29 Suppl 1:i20–9. Epub 2014/07/12. 10.1093/heapol/czt050 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4095923.
    1. Yadav K, Jarhyan P, Gupta V, Pandav CS. Revitalizing Rural Health Care Delivery: Can Rural Health Practitioners be the Answer? Indian journal of community medicine: official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. 2009;34(1):3–5. Epub 2009/10/31. 10.4103/0970-0218.45368 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc2763651.
    1. Staff-Writer. Indian government to promote birth spacing: JP Nadda. Express Healthcare. January 25, 2016.
    1. IIPS. NFHS-4 Fact Sheets for Key Indicators Based on Final Data Mumbai, India: National Institute of Health and Family Welfare, India; January 2016 [February 2, 2016]. Available from: .
    1. FP2020. FP2020 Partnership in Progress 2013–2014. November 2014.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner