Mobile Tuberculosis Treatment Support Tools to Increase Treatment Success in Patients with Tuberculosis in Argentina: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Sarah Iribarren, Hannah Milligan, Kyle Goodwin, Omar Alfonso Aguilar Vidrio, Cristina Chirico, Hugo Telles, Daniela Morelli, Barry Lutz, Jennifer Sprecher, Fernando Rubinstein, Sarah Iribarren, Hannah Milligan, Kyle Goodwin, Omar Alfonso Aguilar Vidrio, Cristina Chirico, Hugo Telles, Daniela Morelli, Barry Lutz, Jennifer Sprecher, Fernando Rubinstein

Abstract

Background: Tuberculosis (TB) is an urgent global health threat and the world's deadliest infectious disease despite being largely curable. A critical challenge is to ensure that patients adhere to the full course of treatment to prevent the continued spread of the disease and development of drug-resistant disease. Mobile health interventions hold promise to provide the required adherence support to improve TB treatment outcomes.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the TB treatment support tools (TB-TSTs) intervention on treatment outcomes (success and default) and to assess patient and provider perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to TB-TSTs implementation.

Methods: The TB-TSTs study is an open-label, randomized controlled trial with 2 parallel groups in which 400 adult patients newly diagnosed with TB will be randomly assigned to receive usual care or usual care plus TB-TSTs. Participants will be recruited on a rolling basis from 4 clinical sites in Argentina. The intervention consists of a smartphone progressive web app, a treatment supporter (eg, TB nurse, physician, or social worker), and a direct adherence test strip engineered for home use. Intervention group participants will report treatment progress and interact with a treatment supporter using the app and metabolite urine test strip. The primary outcome will be treatment success. Secondary outcomes will include treatment default rates, self-reported adherence, technology use, and usability. We will assess patients' and providers' perceptions of barriers to implementation and synthesize lessons learned. We hypothesize that the TB-TSTs intervention will be more effective because it allows patients and TB supporters to monitor and address issues in real time and provide tailored support. We will share the results with stakeholders and policy makers.

Results: Enrollment began in November 2020, with a delayed start due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and complete enrollment is expected by approximately July 2022. Data collection and follow-up are expected to be completed 6 months after the last patient is enrolled. Results from the analyses based on the primary end points are expected to be submitted for publication within a year of data collection completion.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this randomized controlled trial will be the first study to evaluate a patient-centered remote treatment support strategy using a mobile tool and a home-based direct drug metabolite test. The results will provide robust scientific evidence on the effectiveness, implementation, and adoption of mobile health tools. The findings have broader implications not only for TB adherence but also more generally for chronic disease management and will improve our understanding of how to support patients facing challenging treatment regimens.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04221789; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04221789.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/28094.

Keywords: digital health; direct drug metabolite test; disease management; infectious disease; mHealth; mobile phone; tuberculosis.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Some of the authors are developers (SI, KG, and OAAV) and evaluators (SI, HM, CC, HT, and FR) of the software.

©Sarah Iribarren, Hannah Milligan, Kyle Goodwin, Omar Alfonso Aguilar Vidrio, Cristina Chirico, Hugo Telles, Daniela Morelli, Barry Lutz, Jennifer Sprecher, Fernando Rubinstein. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 21.06.2021.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recruitment flow diagram. TB: tuberculosis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient app features.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intervention overview. TB: tuberculosis.

References

    1. World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Oct 15, [2021-05-09]. Global tuberculosis report 2020. .
    1. WHO End TB Strategy. World Health Organization. 2015. [2021-05-09].
    1. Global plan to end TB: the paradigm shift 2016-2020. Stop TB Partnership. 2015. [2021-05-09]. .
    1. Sustainable development goals. United Nations. [2021-05-09].
    1. Mauch V, Bonsu F, Gyapong M, Awini E, Suarez P, Marcelino B, Melgen RE, Lönnroth K, Nhung NV, Hoa NB, Klinkenberg E. Free tuberculosis diagnosis and treatment are not enough: patient cost evidence from three continents. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2013 Mar 01;17(3):381–7. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.12.0368.
    1. Digital health for the End TB Strategy - an agenda for action. World Health Organization. 2015. [2021-05-09].
    1. The End TB Strategy areas of work, TB publications, TB data news, events and features about US digital health for the End TB Strategy: progress since 2015 and future perspectives. World Health Organization. 2017. [2021-05-09].
    1. Latif AI, Sjattar EL, Erika KA. Models and benefits of mobile health application to support patient with tuberculosis: a literature review. Enferm Clin. 2020 Mar;30 Suppl 2:163–7. doi: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2019.07.069.
    1. DiStefano MJ, Schmidt H. mHealth for tuberculosis treatment adherence: a framework to guide ethical planning, implementation, and evaluation. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Jun 27;4(2):211–21. doi: 10.9745/ghsp-d-16-00018.
    1. Schnall R, Bakken S, Brown III W, Carballo-Dieguez A, Iribarren S. Usabilty evaluation of a prototype mobile app for health management for persons living with HIV. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:481–5.
    1. Peiris D, Miranda JJ, Mohr DC. Going beyond killer apps: building a better mHealth evidence base. BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Feb 21;3(1):e000676. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000676.
    1. Iribarren SJ, Schnall R, Stone PW, Carballo-Diéguez A. Smartphone applications to support tuberculosis prevention and treatment: review and evaluation. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 May 13;4(2):e25. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5022.
    1. Keutzer L, Wicha SG, Simonsson US. Mobile health apps for improvement of tuberculosis treatment: descriptive review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Apr 21;8(4):e17246. doi: 10.2196/17246.
    1. Iribarren S, Demiris G, Lober B, Chirico C. What do patients and experts want in a smartphone-based application to support tuberculosis treatment completion? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;250:32.
    1. World Health Organization . Global tuberculosis report 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. pp. 1–142.
    1. Schnall R, Rojas M, Bakken S, Brown W, Carballo-Dieguez A, Carry M, Gelaude D, Mosley JP, Travers J. A user-centered model for designing consumer mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) J Biomed Inform. 2016 Apr;60:243–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.02.002.
    1. Fisher JD, Amico KR, Fisher WA, Harman JJ. The information-motivation-behavioral skills model of antiretroviral adherence and its applications. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2008 Nov 25;5(4):193–203. doi: 10.1007/s11904-008-0028-y.
    1. TB treatment support tool interactive mobile app and direct adherence monitoring on TB treatment outcomes (TB-TST) Identifier: NCT04221789. [2021-05-09]. .
    1. Eysenbach G, CONSORT-EHEALTH Group CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of Web-based and mobile health interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 31;13(4):e126. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1923.
    1. Iribarren SJ, Beck SL, Pearce PF, Chirico C, Etchevarria M, Rubinstein F. mHealth intervention development to support patients with active tuberculosis. J Mob Technol Med. 2014 Jul 28;3(2):16–27. doi: 10.7309/jmtm.3.2.4.
    1. Fisher JD, Fisher WA, Amico KR, Harman JJ. An information-motivation-behavioral skills model of adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Health Psychol. 2006 Jul;25(4):462–73. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.4.462.
    1. Munro S, Lewin S, Swart T, Volmink J. A review of health behaviour theories: how useful are these for developing interventions to promote long-term medication adherence for TB and HIV/AIDS? BMC Public Health. 2007 Jun 11;7(1):104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-104.
    1. Navarro JG. Smartphone users as share of the population in Argentina from 2015 to 2025. Statista. 2021. [2021-05-09].
    1. Klein K, Bernachea MP, Iribarren S, Gibbons L, Chirico C, Rubinstein F. Correction: Evaluation of a social protection policy on tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2019 May 31;16(5):e1002826. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002826.
    1. Dall C. Experts warn COVID-19 lockdowns could have dire impact on TB. Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy. 2020. [2020-04-06]. .
    1. Chen Y, Wang Y, Fleming J, Yu Y, Gu Y, Liu C, Fan L, Wang X, Cheng M, Bi L, Liu Y. Active or latent tuberculosis increases susceptibility to COVID-19 and disease severity. medRxiv. 2020:A. doi: 10.1101/2020.03.10.20033795.
    1. Guidelines for treatment of tuberculosis. Fourth edition. World Health Organization. 2010. [2021-05-09].
    1. Guerra RL, Conde MB, Efron A, Loredo C, Bastos G, Chaisson RE, Golub JE. Point-of-care Arkansas method for measuring adherence to treatment with isoniazid. Respir Med. 2010 May;104(5):754–7. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.02.001.
    1. Schraufnagel DE, Stoner R, Whiting E, Snukst-Torbeck G, Werhane MJ. Testing for isoniazid. An evaluation of the Arkansas method. Chest. 1990 Aug;98(2):314–6. doi: 10.1378/chest.98.2.314.
    1. Kilburn JO, Beam RE, David HL, Sanchez E, Corpe RF, Dunn W. Reagent-impregnated paper strip for detection of metabolic products of isoniazid in urine. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1972 Dec;106(6):923–4. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1972.106.6.923.
    1. Meissner PE, Musoke P, Okwera A, Bunn JE, Coulter JB. The value of urine testing for verifying adherence to anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy in children and adults in Uganda. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002 Oct;6(10):903–8.
    1. Schnall R, Cho H, Liu J. Health Information Technology Usability Evaluation Scale (Health-ITUES) for usability assessment of mobile health technology: validation study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jan 05;6(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8851.
    1. World Health Organization. Geneva: 2020. [2021-05-06]. Tuberculosis profile: Argentina, 2019.
    1. Larrieu EJ, Mujica G, Araya D, Arezo M, errero E, Santillan G, Viscaychipi K, Labanchi JL, Grizmado C, Calabro A, Talmón G, Sepúlveda LL, Galvan JM, Cabrera MG, Seleiman M, Crowley P, Céspedes G, García Cachau MA, Gino LM, Molina L, Daffner JF. Pilot field trial of the EG95 vaccine against ovine cystic echinococcosis in Rio Negro, Argentina: 8 years of work. Cienvet. 2017 Jun 01;19(1):30–49. doi: 10.19137/cienvet-20171913.
    1. Guest G, Namey E, Taylor J, Eley N, McKenna K. Comparing focus groups and individual interviews: findings from a randomized study. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2017 Feb 13;20(6):693–708. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2017.1281601.
    1. Stoyanov SR, Hides L, Kavanagh DJ, Zelenko O, Tjondronegoro D, Mani M. Mobile app rating scale: a new tool for assessing the quality of health mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 11;3(1):e27. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3422.
    1. Mani M, Kavanagh DJ, Hides L, Stoyanov SR. Review and evaluation of mindfulness-based iPhone apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Aug 19;3(3):e82. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4328.
    1. Creber RM, Maurer MS, Reading M, Hiraldo G, Hickey KT, Iribarren S. Review and analysis of existing mobile phone apps to support heart failure symptom monitoring and self-care management using the mobile application rating scale (MARS) JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 14;4(2):e74. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5882.
    1. Iribarren SJ, Sward KA, Beck SL, Pearce PF, Thurston D, Chirico C. Qualitative evaluation of a text messaging intervention to support patients with active tuberculosis: implementation considerations. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Feb 27;3(1):e21. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3971.
    1. Lincoln YS, Guba EG, Pilotta JJ. Naturalistic inquiry. Int J Intercult Relat. 1985 Jan;9(4):438–9. doi: 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8.
    1. Creswell JW, Klassen AC, Plano-Clark VL, Smith KC. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Commissioned by the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (OBSSR), National Institutes of Health (NIH) [2021-05-09]. .
    1. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Edu Res. 2016 Jul 01;33(7):14–26. doi: 10.3102/0013189x033007014.
    1. Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2016 Jun 30;27(2):237–46. doi: 10.1177/1098214005283748.
    1. Hirpa S, Medhin G, Girma B, Melese M, Mekonen A, Suarez P, Ameni G. Determinants of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in patients who underwent first-line treatment in Addis Ababa: a case control study. BMC Public Health. 2013 Aug 28;13(1):782. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-782.
    1. Maartens G, Wilkinson RJ. Tuberculosis. Lancet. 2007 Dec;370(9604):2030–43. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61262-8.
    1. Mitchison DA. How drug resistance emerges as a result of poor compliance during short course chemotherapy for tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 1998 Jan;2(1):10–5.
    1. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 04;353(5):487–97. doi: 10.1056/nejmra050100.
    1. Ray TK, Sharma N, Singh MM, Ingle GK. Economic burden of tuberculosis in patients attending DOT centres in Delhi. J Commun Dis. 2005 Jun;37(2):93–8.
    1. The price of a pandemic: counting the cost of MDR-TB. All Party Parliamentary Group on Global Tuberculosis. [2021-05-09]. .
    1. The costly burden of DrugResistant TB disease in the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [2021-05-09]. .
    1. Corbett EL, Watt CJ, Walker N, Maher D, Williams BG, Raviglione MC, Dye C. The growing burden of tuberculosis: global trends and interactions with the HIV epidemic. Arch Intern Med. 2003 May 12;163(9):1009–21. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.9.1009.
    1. Iribarren SJ, Rubinstein F, Discacciati V, Pearce PF. Listening to those at the frontline: patient and healthcare personnel perspectives on tuberculosis treatment barriers and facilitators in high TB burden regions of Argentina. Tuberc Res Treat. 2014;2014:135823. doi: 10.1155/2014/135823. doi: 10.1155/2014/135823.
    1. Sharma SK, editor. Tuberculosis. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2009. International Standards for Tuberculosis Care (ISTC) pp. 1–1078.
    1. World Health Organization . Global Tuberculosis Report 2015, 20th Ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. pp. 1–192.
    1. Hoffman JA, Cunningham JR, Suleh AJ, Sundsmo A, Dekker D, Vago F, Munly K, Igonya EK, Hunt-Glassman J. Mobile direct observation treatment for tuberculosis patients: a technical feasibility pilot using mobile phones in Nairobi, Kenya. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Jul;39(1):78–80. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.02.018.
    1. Wade VA, Karnon J, Eliott JA, Hiller JE. Home videophones improve direct observation in tuberculosis treatment: a mixed methods evaluation. PLoS One. 2012 Nov 30;7(11):e50155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050155.
    1. Belknap R, Weis S, Brookens A, Au-Yeung KY, Moon G, DiCarlo L, Reves R. Feasibility of an ingestible sensor-based system for monitoring adherence to tuberculosis therapy. PLoS One. 2013 Jan 7;8(1):e53373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053373.
    1. Soobratty MR, Whitfield R, Subramaniam K, Grove G, Carver A, O'Donovan GV, Wu HH, Lee OY, Swaminathan R, Cope GF, Milburn HJ. Point-of-care urine test for assessing adherence to isoniazid treatment for tuberculosis. Eur Respir J. 2014 May 16;43(5):1519–22. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00132613.
    1. Singer E. TB Drug Compliance: Paper drug test and text messaging could help thwart the most deadly strains of tuberculosis. MIT Technology Review. 2009. [2021-05-09].
    1. ICT facts and figures. The International Telecommunication Union. 2016. [2021-05-09]. .
    1. Improving patient adherence to treatment and prevention regimens to promote health (R01 Clinical Trial Optional) National Institutes of Health. 2019. [2021-05-07]. .

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner