Single-dose pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment

Magda S C Fontes, Jasper Dingemanse, Atef Halabi, Monika Tomaszewska-Kiecana, Patricia N Sidharta, Magda S C Fontes, Jasper Dingemanse, Atef Halabi, Monika Tomaszewska-Kiecana, Patricia N Sidharta

Abstract

The effect of moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan was clinically investigated as 25% of aprocitentan is cleared through the liver. Aprocitentan is in clinical development for the treatment of resistant hypertension. This was an open-label, Phase 1 study. Subjects were recruited in two groups (i.e., moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh B; n = 8) and matched healthy subjects (n = 9) and received a single oral dose of 25 mg aprocitentan. Thereafter, they were observed for 14 days. Due to personal reasons one healthy subject discontinued the study. The PK of aprocitentan were similar between subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy subjects, with maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) reached at 4.0 h. There was no difference in Cmax, indicated by the geometric means ratio (90% confidence interval) of 1.03 (0.86-1.24). There was a lower apparent clearance, a similar apparent volume of distribution, a longer terminal half-life (56.4 h vs 48.3 h in healthy subjects), and an increase in area under the curve from zero to infinity of 23% in moderate hepatically impaired subjects compared to healthy subjects. There were no differences observed in plasma protein binding (range 98.7-99.0%). Aprocitentan was well tolerated, and headache was the only adverse event reported by one subject. In conclusion, there were no clinically relevant differences in PK between subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and healthy subjects. Based on these results, aprocitentan can be administered in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment and dose adjustment is not required.Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04252495.

Conflict of interest statement

M.S.C.F., J.D., and P.N.S. were full-time employees of Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd during the conduct of the study. A.H. and M.T.K. were employees of Clinical Research Services Kiel GmbH and Biokinetica S.A., respectively, during the conduct of the study. Both Clinical Research Services Kiel GmbH and Biokinetica S.A. received financial compensation for the clinical conduct.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Arithmetic mean (± SD) plasma concentration–time profiles of a single oral dose of 25 mg aprocitentan on a linear (upper) and semilogarithmic scale (lower) in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment and matched healthy subjects.

References

    1. Yanagisawa M, et al. A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature. 1988;332:411–415. doi: 10.1038/332411a0.
    1. Kohan DE, Rossi NF, Inscho EW, Pollock DM. Regulation of blood pressure and salt homeostasis by endothelin. Physiol. Rev. 2011;91:1–77. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00060.2009.
    1. Vuurmans TJ, Boer P, Koomans HA. Effects of endothelin-1 and endothelin-1 receptor blockade on cardiac output, aortic pressure, and pulse wave velocity in humans. Hypertension. 2003;41:1253–1258. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000072982.70666.E8.
    1. Iglarz M, Clozel M. At the heart of tissue: Endothelin system and end-organ damage. Clin. Sci. 2010;119:453–463. doi: 10.1042/CS20100222.
    1. Trensz F, et al. Pharmacological characterization of aprocitentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, alone and in combination with blockers of the renin angiotensin system, in two models of experimental hypertension. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2019;368:462–473. doi: 10.1124/jpet.118.253864.
    1. Schiffrin EL. Endothelin: Role in hypertension. Biol. Res. 1998;31:199–208.
    1. Verweij P, Danaietash P, Flamion B, Menard J, Bellet M. Randomized dose-response study of the new dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan in hypertension. Hypertension. 2020;75:956–965. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14504.
    1. Positive Phase 3 study with aprocitentan demonstrates significant antihypertensive efficacy in patients with resistant hypertension. Available at: . Accessed on 22 August 2022.
    1. Sidharta PN, Melchior M, Kankam MK, Dingemanse J. Single- and multiple-dose tolerability, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan in healthy adult and elderly subjects. Drug Des. Deve. Ther. 2019;13:949–964. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S199051.
    1. Sidharta PN, Ulc I, Dingemanse J. Single-dose pharmacokinetics and tolerability of aprocitentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, in subjects with severe renal function impairment. Clin. Drug Investig. 2019;39:1117–1123. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00837-x.
    1. Fontes MSC, Dingemanse J, Sidharta PN. Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of aprocitentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, in healthy Japanese and Caucasian subjects. Clin. Pharmacol. Drug Dev. 2021;10:718–725. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.881.
    1. Sidharta PN, Fischer H, Dingemanse J. Absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of aprocitentan, a dual endothelin receptor antagonist, in humans. Curr. Drug Metab. 2021;22:399–410. doi: 10.2174/1389200222666210204202815.
    1. Sidharta PN, Dingemanse J. Effect of multiple-dose aprocitentan administration on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam in healthy male subjects. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 2020;45:227–234. doi: 10.1007/s13318-019-00590-8.
    1. Sidharta PN, Dingemanse J. Effects of multiple-dose administration of aprocitentan on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin. Clin. Pharmacol. Drug Dev. 2020;9:995–1002. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.815.
    1. Verbeeck RK. Pharmacokinetics and dosage adjustment in patients with hepatic dysfunction. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2008;64:1147–1161. doi: 10.1007/s00228-008-0553-z.
    1. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16:31–41. doi: 10.1159/000180580.
    1. Gault MH, Longerich LL, Harnett JD, Wesolowski C. Predicting glomerular function from adjusted serum creatinine. Nephron. 1992;62:249–256. doi: 10.1159/000187054.
    1. Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br. J. Surg. 1973;60:646–649. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800600817.
    1. Kummer O, et al. Comparison of the dissolution and pharmacokinetic profiles of two galenical formulations of the endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009;38:384–388. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2009.09.005.
    1. Dingemanse J, Sidharta PN, Maddrey WC, Rubin LJ, Mickail H. Efficacy, safety and clinical pharmacology of macitentan in comparison to other endothelin receptor antagonists in the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2014;13:391–405. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2014.859674.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner