Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Dexlansoprazole Infusion Injection Compared with Lansoprazole in Healthy Chinese Adults

Lihua Wu, Jian Liu, Yunliang Zheng, You Zhai, Meihua Lin, Guolan Wu, Duo Lv, Jianzhong Shentu, Lihua Wu, Jian Liu, Yunliang Zheng, You Zhai, Meihua Lin, Guolan Wu, Duo Lv, Jianzhong Shentu

Abstract

Background and objective: This study was performed in healthy Chinese subjects to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of a novel injection formulation of dexlansoprazole in the context of single and multiple administration, compared with the original lansoprazole injection.

Methods: Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy volunteers were recruited, and 70 participants were enrolled into five dosing groups (seven males and seven females in each group), including 15 mg once daily (qd), 15 mg every 12 h (q12h), 30 mg qd and 30 mg q12h of dexlansoprazole treatment for 5 days, as well as 30 mg q12h of lansoprazole treatment for 5 days. Blood samples were collected at scheduled time spots postdose on day 1 (first dose) and day 5 (last dose). Twenty-four-hour intragastric pH was continuously monitored on day 0 (baseline) and days 1 and 5. Dexlansoprazole and S-lansoprazole in human plasma were determined by validated chiral liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by a non-compartmental method using Phoenix WinNonlin software. Safety assessment included changes in vital signs and laboratory tests, physical examination findings, and incidence or reports of adverse events.

Results: The half-life (t½) and clearance (CL) of dexlansoprazole were 1.76-2.06 h and 4.52-5.40 L/h, respectively, while the t½ and CL of S-lansoprazole were 0.87-1.02 h and 34.66-35.98 L/h, respectively. No drug accumulation after repeated administration was noted. Administration of lansoprazole 30 mg resulted in higher area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUCt) of dexlansoprazole than that of dexlansoprazole 15 mg (p = 0.026). Zero to 24 h after q12h multiple dosing, median and mean intragastric pH, percentage of time with the intragastric pH above 4.0 [TpH ≥ 4.0(%)] and percentage of time with the intragastric pH above 6.0 [TpH ≥ 6.0(%)] in the dexlansoprazole 15 mg q12h group were 6.07 ± 0.61, 5.70 ± 0.76, 83.58 ± 12.34, and 53.70 ± 17.06, respectively, which was similar to the lansoprazole 30 mg q12h group, i.e. 6.15 ± 0.62, 5.88 ± 0.67, 87.26 ± 12.08 and 57.00 ± 16.35, respectively. A weak positive correlation between dexlansoprazole AUCt and baseline-adjusted TpH ≥ 4.0(%) over 0-24 h was observed, with Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.437 (p = 0.029), while no correlation was observed between AUCt and baseline-adjusted TpH ≥ 6.0(%) over 0-24 h.

Conclusion: Every 12 h intravenous dosing of dexlansoprazole up to 30 mg for 5 days was safe and well-tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. Every 12 h dosing of dexlansoprazole 15 mg has a comparable effect of gastric acid inhibition as lansoprazole 30 mg q12h.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03120273.

Conflict of interest statement

Lihua Wu, Jian Liu, Yunliang Zheng, You Zhai, Meihua Lin, Guolan Wu, Duo Lv and Jianzhong Shentu declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study screening, enrollment, dosing and follow-up. All 70 participants completed the study regimen
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean plasma concentration-time profiles after single intravenous administration of dexlansoprazole 15 or 30 mg and lansoprazole 30 mg. a Linear scale; b semi-logarithmic scale
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Correlation of dexlansoprazole AUCt and baseline-adjusted a TpH ≥ 4.0(%) or b TpH ≥ 6.0(%) 0–12 h after a single administration. AUCt area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration, TpH≥4.0(%) percentage of time with the intragastric pH above 4.0, TpH≥6.0(%) percentage of time with the intragastric pH above 6.0
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Correlation of dexlansoprazole AUCt and baseline-adjusted TpH ≥ 4.0 (%) 0–24 h after multiple dosing. AUCt area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration, TpH ≥ 4.0 (%) percentage of time with the intragastric pH above 4.0

References

    1. Lau JY, Barkun A, Fan DM, Kuipers EJ, Yang YS, Chan FK. Challenges in the management of acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Lancet. 2013;381(9882):2033–2043. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60596-6.
    1. Gralnek IM, Dumonceau JM, Kuipers EJ, Lanas A, Sanders DS, Kurien M, et al. Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015;47(10):a1–a46. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393172.
    1. Barkun AN, Cockeram AW, Plourde V, Fedorak RN. Review article: acid suppression in non-variceal acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999;13(12):1565–1584. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00623.x.
    1. Worden JC, Hanna KS. Optimizing proton pump inhibitor therapy for treatment of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2017;74(3):109–116. doi: 10.2146/ajhp151032.
    1. Miura M. Enantioselective disposition of lansoprazole and rabeprazole in human plasma. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2006;126(6):395–402. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.126.395.
    1. Miura M, Tada H, Yasui-Furukori N, Uno T, Sugawara K, Tateishi T, et al. Pharmacokinetic differences between the enantiomers of lansoprazole and its metabolite, 5-hydroxylansoprazole, in relation to CYP2C19 genotypes. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;60(9):623–628. doi: 10.1007/s00228-004-0809-1.
    1. Freston JW, Pilmer BL, Chiu YL, Wang Q, Stolle JC, Griffin JS, et al. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous lansoprazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;19(10):1111–1122. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01942.x.
    1. Andersson T, Weidolf L. Stereoselective disposition of proton pump inhibitors. Clin Drug Investig. 2008;28(5):263–279. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200828050-00001.
    1. Oldfield EC, 4th, Parekh PJ, Johnson DA. Dexlansoprazole: delayed-release orally disintegrating tablets for the treatment of heartburn associated with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease and the maintenance of erosive esophagitis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;10(10):1083–1089. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2016.1230496.
    1. Sun L, Cao Y, Jiao H, Fang Y, Yang Z, Bian M, et al. Enantioselective determination of (R)- and (S)-lansoprazole in human plasma by chiral liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry and its application to a stereoselective pharmacokinetic study. J Sep Sci. 2015;38(21):3696–3703. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201500653.
    1. Li YQ, Yan ZY, Zhang HW, Sun LN, Jiao HW, Wang MF, et al. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexlansoprazole injection in healthy Chinese subjects. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;73(5):547–554. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2206-6.
    1. Sun LN, Cao Y, Li YQ, Fang YQ, Zhang HW, Wang MF, et al. Impact of Gastric H(+)/K(+)-ATPase rs2733743 on the Intragastric pH-Values of Dexlansoprazole Injection in Chinese Subjects. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:670. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00670.
    1. El Rouby N, Lima JJ, Johnson JA. Proton pump inhibitors: from CYP2C19 pharmacogenetics to precision medicine. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2018;14(4):447–460. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2018.1461835.
    1. Shin JM, Kim N. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the proton pump inhibitors. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;19(1):25–35. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2013.19.1.25.
    1. Park S, Hyun YJ, Kim YR, Lee JH, Ryu S, Kim JM, et al. Effects of CYP2C19 Genetic Polymorphisms on PK/PD Responses of Omeprazole in Korean Healthy Volunteers. J Korean Med Sci. 2017;32(5):729–736. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.5.729.
    1. Puchalski TA, Krzyzanski W, Blum RA, Jusko WJ. Pharmacodynamic modeling of lansoprazole using an indirect irreversible response model. J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;41(3):251–258. doi: 10.1177/00912700122010069.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner