Recruitment to a randomized web-based nutritional intervention trial: characteristics of participants compared to non-participants

Melanie A Stopponi, Gwen L Alexander, Jennifer B McClure, Nikki M Carroll, George W Divine, Josephine H Calvi, Sharon J Rolnick, Victor J Strecher, Christine Cole Johnson, Debra P Ritzwoller, Melanie A Stopponi, Gwen L Alexander, Jennifer B McClure, Nikki M Carroll, George W Divine, Josephine H Calvi, Sharon J Rolnick, Victor J Strecher, Christine Cole Johnson, Debra P Ritzwoller

Abstract

Background: Web-based behavioral programs efficiently disseminate health information to a broad population, and online tailoring may increase their effectiveness. While the number of Internet-based behavioral interventions has grown in the last several years, additional information is needed to understand the characteristics of subjects who enroll in these interventions, relative to those subjects who are invited to enroll.

Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the characteristics of participants who enrolled in an online dietary intervention trial (MENU) with those who were invited but chose not to participate, in order to better understand how these groups differ.

Methods: The MENU trial was conducted among five health plans participating in the HMO Cancer Research Network in collaboration with the University of Michigan Center for Health Communication Research. Approximately 6000 health plan members per site, between the ages of 21 and 65, and stratified by gender with oversampling of minority populations, were randomly selected for recruitment and were mailed an invitation letter containing website information and a US$2 bill with the promise of US$20 for completing follow-up surveys. Administrative and area-based data using geocoding along with baseline survey data were used to compare invitees (HMO members sent the introductory letter), responders (those who entered a study ID on the website), and enrollees (those who completed the enrollment process). Generalized estimating equation multivariate and logistic regression models were used to assess predictors of response and enrollment.

Results: Of 28,460 members invited to participate, 4270 (15.0%) accessed the website. Of the eligible responders, 2540 (8.9%) completed the consent form and baseline survey and were enrolled and randomized. The odds of responding were 10% lower for every decade of increased age (P < .001), while the likelihood of enrolling was 10% higher for every decade increase in age (P < .001). Women were more likely to respond and to enroll (P < .001). Those living in a census tract associated with higher education levels were more likely to respond and enroll, as well as those residing in tracts with higher income (P < .001). With a 22% (n = 566) enrollment rate for African Americans and 8% (n = 192) for Hispanics, the enrolled sample was more racially and ethnically diverse than the background sampling frame.

Conclusions: Relative to members invited to participate in the Internet-based intervention, those who enrolled were more likely to be older and live in census tracts associated with higher socioeconomic status. While oversampling of minority health plan members generated an enrolled sample that was more racially and ethnically diverse than the overall health plan population, additional research is needed to better understand methods that will expand the penetration of Internet interventions into more socioeconomically diverse populations.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00169312; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT00169312 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/5jB50xSfU).

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
MENU flyer
Figure 2
Figure 2
Recruitment flowchart for MENU

References

    1. Ritterband LM, Gonder-Frederick LA, Cox DJ, Clifton AD, West RW, Borowitz SM. Internet interventions: In review, in use, and into the future. Prof Psychol: Research and Practice. 2003;34(5):527–537. doi: 10.1037/0735-7028.34.5.527.
    1. Griffiths Frances, Lindenmeyer Antje, Powell John, Lowe Pam, Thorogood Margaret. Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? A systematic review of the published literature. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(2):e10. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e10. v8i2e10
    1. Noah Shahrul A, Abdullah Siti Norulhuda, Shahar Suzana, Abdul-Hamid Helmi, Khairudin Nurkahirizan, Yusoff Mohamed, Ghazali Rafidah, Mohd-Yusoff Nooraini, Shafii Nik Shanita, Abdul-Manaf Zaharah. DietPal: a Web-based dietary menu-generating and management system. J Med Internet Res. 2004 Jan 30;6(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.1.e4.
    1. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, authors. Communicating Health: Priorities and Strategies for Progress. Action Plan to Achieve the Health Communication Objectives in Healthy People 2010. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 2003. [2009-01-30].
    1. McClure Jennifer B, Greene Sarah M, Wiese Cheryl, Johnson Karin E, Alexander Gwen, Strecher Victor. Interest in an online smoking cessation program and effective recruitment strategies: results from Project Quit. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(3):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.3.e14. v8i3e14
    1. Joinson AN, Ulf-Dietrick R. Personalized salutation, power of sender and response rates to Web-based surveys. Computers in Human Behavior. 2007;23(3):1372–1383. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.011.
    1. Dillman DA. Survey Implementation. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2000.
    1. Alexander GL, Divine GW, Couper MP. Effect of incentives and mailing features on online health program enrollment. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34(5):382–388. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.028.
    1. Alexander GL, McClure J, Calvi J. A randomized clinical trial evaluating online interventions to improve fruit and vegetable consumption. American Journal of Public Health. In press.
    1. Block G, Sternfeld B, Block CH. Development of Alive! (A Lifestyle Intervention via E-mail), and its effect on Health-related quality of life, presenteeism, and other behavioral outcomes: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(4):e43. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1112.
    1. O'Doherty Jensen K, Holm L. Preferences, quantities and concerns: Socio-cultural perspectives on the general consumption of foods. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1999;53(5):351–359. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600767.
    1. Wardle Jane, Haase Anne M, Steptoe Andrew, Nillapun Maream, Jonwutiwes Kiriboon, Bellisle France. Gender differences in food choice: the contribution of health beliefs and dieting. Ann Behav Med. 2004 Apr;27(2):107–16. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2702_5.
    1. Watters Joanne L, Satia Jessie A, Galanko Joseph A. Associations of psychosocial factors with fruit and vegetable intake among African-Americans. Public Health Nutr. 2007 Jul;10(7):701–11. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007662284.S1368980007662284
    1. Wagner EH, Greene SM, Hart G. Building a research consortium of large health systems: the Cancer Research Network. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005;35(35):3–11. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi032.
    1. Passel JS, Word DL. 1980;census An application of Bayes’ Theorem. Presented at: Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America; April 10-12, 1980; Denver, Colorado.
    1. Perkins R. Evaluating the Passel-Word Spanish Surname List. Washington, DC: Population Division, U.S. Bureau of the Census; 1993.
    1. Word DL, Perkins RC Jr. Building a Spanish surname list for the 1990’s—A new approach to an old problem. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census; 1996. [2008-03-05]. .
    1. Ritzwoller DP, Carroll N, Gaglio B. Variation in Hispanic self-identification, Spanish surname, and geocoding: implications for ethnicity data collection. Open Health Svs Pol J. 2008;1(1):12–18. doi: 10.2174/1874924000801010012.
    1. Koo Malcolm, Skinner Harvey. Challenges of internet recruitment: a case study with disappointing results. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e6. v7e6
    1. Glasgow RE, Nelson CC, Kearney KA. Reach, engagement, and retention in an Internet-based weight loss program in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(2):e11. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e11.
    1. SAS Institute Inc., authors 2004 SAS/STAT 9.1 Users Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2004.
    1. Oenema A, Brug J, Lechner L. Web-based tailored nutrition education: results of a randomized controlled trial. Health Educ Res. 2001 Dec;16(6):647–60. doi: 10.1093/her/16.6.647.
    1. Verheijden Marieke W, Jans Marielle P, Hildebrandt Vincent H, Hopman-Rock Marijke. Rates and determinants of repeated participation in a web-based behavior change program for healthy body weight and healthy lifestyle. J Med Internet Res. 2007;9(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.1.e1. v9i1e1
    1. Smith K Sabina, Eubanks Donna, Petrik Amanda, Stevens Victor J. Using web-based screening to enhance efficiency of HMO clinical trial recruitment in women aged forty and older. Clin Trials. 2007;4(1):102–5. doi: 10.1177/1740774506075863.4/1/102
    1. Helgeson JG, Voss KE, Terpening WD. Determinants of mail-survey response: Survey design factors and respondent factors. Psychology and Marketing. 2002;19(3):303–328. doi: 10.1002/mar.1054.
    1. Campbell MK, Reynolds KD, Havas EA. Stages of change for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among adults and young adults participating in the National 5-A-Day for Better Health community studies. Health Educ Behav. 1999;26(4):513–534. doi: 10.1177/109019819902600409.
    1. Internet activities. Pew Internet & American Life Project. [2009-10-13]. .
    1. Strecher Victor. Internet methods for delivering behavioral and health-related interventions (eHealth) Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3(1):53–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091428.
    1. McNeill Lorna H, Viswanath K, Bennett Gary G, Puleo Elaine, Emmons Karen M. Feasibility of using a web-based nutrition intervention among residents of multiethnic working-class neighborhoods. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Jun 15;4(3):A55. A55

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner