Directive and nondirective social support in the workplace - is this social support distinction important for subjective health complaints, job satisfaction, and perception of job demands and job control?

Tone Langjordet Johnsen, Hege Randi Eriksen, Aage Indahl, Torill Helene Tveito, Tone Langjordet Johnsen, Hege Randi Eriksen, Aage Indahl, Torill Helene Tveito

Abstract

Aims: Social support is associated with well-being and positive health outcomes. However, positive outcomes of social support might be more dependent on the way support is provided than the amount of support received. A distinction can be made between directive social support, where the provider resumes responsibility, and nondirective social support, where the receiver has the control. This study examined the relationship between directive and nondirective social support, and subjective health complaints, job satisfaction and perception of job demands and job control.

Methods: A survey was conducted among 957 Norwegian employees, working in 114 private kindergartens (mean age 40.7 years, SD = 10.5, 92.8% female), as part of a randomized controlled trial. This study used only baseline data. A factor analysis of the Norwegian version of the Social Support Inventory was conducted, identifying two factors: nondirective and directive social support. Hierarchical regression analyses were then performed.

Results: Nondirective social support was related to fewer musculoskeletal and pseudoneurological complaints, higher job satisfaction, and the perception of lower job demands and higher job control. Directive social support had the opposite relationship, but was not statistically significant for pseudoneurological complaints.

Conclusions: It appears that for social support to be positively related with job characteristics and subjective health complaints, it has to be nondirective. Directive social support was not only without any association, but had a significant negative relationship with several of the variables. Nondirective social support may be an important factor to consider when aiming to improve the psychosocial work environment.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02396797. Registered 23 March 2015.

Keywords: Social support; coworkers; directive social support; employees; job control; job demands; job satisfaction; nondirective social support; preschool teacher; subjective health complaints.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Med 2010; 7(7): e1000316. DOI: .
    1. Gallant MP. The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: A review and directions for research. Health Educ Behav 2003; 30: 170–195.
    1. Shirom A, Toker S, Alkaly S, et al. Work-based predictors of mortality: A 20-year follow-up of healthy employees. Health Psychol 2011; 30: 268–275.
    1. Knapstad M, Holmgren K, Hensing G, et al. Previous sickness absence and current low perceived social support at work among employees in the general population: a historical cohort study. BMJ Open 2014;4:e005963. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005963.
    1. Blanch A. Social support as a mediator between job control and psychological strain. Soc Sci Med 2016; 157: 148–155.
    1. Häusser JA, Mojzisch A, Niesel M, et al. Ten years on: A review of recent research on the Job Demand–Control (-Support) model and psychological well-being. Work Stress 2010; 24: 1–35.
    1. Stansfeld S, Candy B. Psychosocial work environment and mental health – A meta-analytic review. Scand J Work Environ Health 2006; 32: 443–462.
    1. Cohen S, Mermelstein R, Kamark T, et al. Measuring the functional components of social support. In: Sarason IG, Sarason BR. (eds) Social support: Theory, research, and application. The Hague, Holland: Martinus Nijhoff, 1985, pp.73–94.
    1. Fisher EB, Greca AM, Greco P, et al. Directive and nondirective social support in diabetes management. Int J Behav Med 1997; 4: 131–144.
    1. Harber KD, Schneider JK, Everard KM, et al. Directive support, nondirective support, and morale. J Soc Clin Psychol 2005; 24: 691–722.
    1. Stewart DW, Gabriele JM, Fisher EB. Directive support, nondirective support, and health behaviors in a community sample. J Behav Med 2012; 35: 492–499.
    1. Den Oudsten B, Van Heck G, Van der Steeg A, et al. Personality predicts perceived availability of social support and satisfaction with social support in women with early stage breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 2010; 18: 499–508.
    1. Øyeflaten I, Gabriele JM, Fisher EB, et al. Social support and subjective health complaints in occupational rehabilitation. Int J Ther Rehabil 2010; 17: 424–434.
    1. Kowitt SD, Ayala GX, Cherrington AL, et al. Examining the support peer supporters provide using structural equation modeling: Nondirective and directive support in diabetes management. Ann Behav Med. Epub ahead of print 17 April 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-017-9904-2.
    1. Gabriele JM, Carpenter BD, Tate DF, et al. Directive and nondirective e-coach support for weight Loss in overweight adults. Ann Behav Med 2011; 41: 252–263.
    1. Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration. Legemeldte sykefraværstilfeller 4 kv 2005–2014. Diagnose og kjønn. Antall, (2015, accessed 27 March 2015).
    1. Roelen CAM, Koopmans PC, Notenbomer A, et al. Job satisfaction and sickness absence: A questionnaire survey. Occ Med 2008; 58: 567–571.
    1. Mather L, Bergstrom G, Blom V, et al. High job demands, job strain, and iso-strain are risk factors for sick leave due to mental disorders. A prospective swedish twin study with a 5-year follow-up. J Occup Environ Med 2015; 57: 858–865.
    1. Clumeck N, Kempenaers C, Godin I, et al. Working conditions predict incidence of long-term spells of sick leave due to depression: Results from the Belstress I prospective study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2009; 63: 286–292.
    1. Chiaburu DS, Harrison DA. Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. J Appl Psychol 2008; 93: 1082–1103.
    1. Johnsen TL, Indahl A, Baste V, et al. Protocol of the atWork trial: A randomised controlled trial of a workplace intervention targeting subjective health complaints. BMC Public Health 2016;16(844). DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3515-x.
    1. Eriksen HR, Ihlebæk C, Ursin H. A scoring system for subjective health complaints (SHC). Scand J Public Health 1999; 27: 63–72.
    1. Quinn RP, Shepard LG. The 1972–1973 Quality of Employment Survey. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, 1974.
    1. Wanous JP, Reichers AE, Hudy MJ. Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? JAppl Psychol 1997; 82: 247–252.
    1. Theorell T, Michélsen H, Nordemar R. Music 1 study group. Validitetsprøvning av psykososiala indexbildningar. In: Hagberg M, Hogstedt C. (eds) Stockholmsundersøkningen 1. Stockholm: Music Books, 1993, pp.163–177.
    1. Karasek R, Theorell T. Healthy work: Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books, 1990.
    1. Kung AL, Moley JF, DeBenedetti MK, et al. Social support and distress among adults with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia. Paper presented at the conference Behavioral medicine: Looking forwards to the next 25 years, Baltimore, US, 24 March–27 March 2004 Baltimore: Society of Behavioral Medicine.
    1. Semmer NK, Elfering A, Jacobshagen N, et al. The emotional meaning of instrumental social support. Int J Stress Manage 2008; 15: 235–251.
    1. Kim HS, Sherman DK, Taylor SE. Culture and social support. Am Psychol 2008; 63: 518–526.
    1. Briggs SR, Cheek JM. The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. J Personal 1986; 54: 106–148.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner