The EpiNo® Device: Efficacy, Tolerability, and Impact on Pelvic Floor-Implications for Future Research

Tilemachos Kavvadias, Irene Hoesli, Tilemachos Kavvadias, Irene Hoesli

Abstract

Aims. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the available literature on preventing perineal trauma with the EpiNo. Methods. We perfomed a literature research in the MedLine and EMBASE databases for studies referring to EpiNo published between 1990 and 2014, without restrictions for language and study type. Results. Five published studies were identified, regarding the effect of EpiNo on the rate of episiotomy and perineal tears, pelvic floor muscle function, and fetal outcome. The device seems to reduce episiotomy and perineal tears' rate, as well as the risk for levator ani microtrauma and avulsion, though not always statistically significant. It does not seem to have an effect on duration of second stage of labour and fetal outcome. The device is well tolerated and the adverse events are rare and mild. However, design and reporting bias in the reviewed articles do not allow evidence based conclusions. Conclusions. The EpiNo device seems to be promising, with potential positive effects on natural birth, while being uncomplicated to use and without major complications. Well designed, randomized trials are needed in order to understand the effects of EpiNo on pelvic floor and make evidence based recommendations on its use.

References

    1. Premkumar G. Perineal trauma: reducing associated postnatal maternal morbidity. RCM Midwives. 2005;8(1):30–32.
    1. Albers L. L., Sedler K. D., Bedrick E. J., Teaf D., Peralta P. Factors related to genital tract trauma in normal spontaneous vaginal births. Birth. 2006;33(2):94–100. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00085.x.
    1. MacArthur A. J., MacArthur C. Incidence, severity, and determinants of perineal pain after vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;191(4):1199–1204. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.02.064.
    1. Boyles S. H., Li H., Mori T., Osterweil P., Guise J.-M. Effect of mode of delivery on the incidence of urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2009;113(1):134–141. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318191bb37.
    1. Sultan A. H., Thakar R. Lower genital tract and anal sphincter trauma. Best Practice & Research: Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2002;16(1):99–115. doi: 10.1053/beog.2002.0258.
    1. Reid A. J., Beggs A. D., Sultan A. H., Roos A.-M., Thakar R. Outcome of repair of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after three years. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2014;127(1):47–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.04.013.
    1. Graham I. D., Carroli G., Davies C., Medves J. M. Episiotomy rates around the world: an update. Birth. 2005;32(3):219–223. doi: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00373.x.
    1. Schwappach D. L. B., Blaudszun A., Conen D., Eichler K., Hochreutener M.-A., Koeck C. M. Women's experiences with low-risk singleton in-hospital delivery in Switzerland. Swiss Medical Weekly. 2004;134(7-8):103–109.
    1. Woolley R. J. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: a review of the english-language literature since 1980. Part I. Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey. 1995;50(11):806–820. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199511000-00020.
    1. Sartore A., De Seta F., Maso G., Pregazzi R., Grimaldi E., Guaschino S. The effects of mediolateral episiotomy on pelvic floor function after vaginal delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;103(4):669–673. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000119223.04441.c9.
    1. Thiagamoorthy G., Johnson A., Thakar R., Sultan A. H. National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management in the United Kingdom. International Urogynecology Journal. 2014;25(12):1621–1627. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2406-x.
    1. World Health Organization. Care in Normal Birth: A Practical Guide. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1996. Care during the second stage of labour. .
    1. Carroli G., Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009;(1) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2.CD000081
    1. Pelaez M., Gonzalez-Cerron S., Montejo R., Barakat R. Pelvic floor muscle training included in a pregnancy exercise program is effective in primary prevention of urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2014;33(1):67–71. doi: 10.1002/nau.22381.
    1. Henderson J., Burns E. E., Regalia A. L., Casarico G., Boulton M. G., Smith L. A. Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obsteric units in Italy: prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014;14, article 17 doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-17.
    1. Gupta J. K., Hofmeyr G. J., Shehmar M. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012;(5)CD002006
    1. Aasheim V., Nilsen A. B. V., Lukasse M., Reinar L. M. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011;12 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006672.pub2.CD006672
    1. Epi-No® Homepage, .
    1. Schuchardt R., Hillebrenner J., Hoffmann S., Horkel W., Schelling M., Schneider K. T. M. Birth preparation with a novel birth training device. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pränatal- und Geburtsmedizin; May 2000; Nürnberg, Germany.
    1. Shek K. L., Chantarasorn V., Langer S., Phipps H., Dietz H. P. Does the Epi-NoⓇ birth trainer reduce levator trauma? A randomised controlled trial. International Urogynecology Journal. 2011;22(12):1521–1528. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1517-x.
    1. Ruckhäberle E., Jundt K., Bäuerle M., et al. Prospective randomised multicentre trial with the birth trainer EPI-NO® for the prevention of perineal trauma. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2009;49(5):478–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01044.x.
    1. Kovacs G. T., Heath P., Heather C. First Australian trial of the birth-training device Epi-No: a highly significantly increased chance of an intact perineum. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2004;44(4):347–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2004.00265.x.
    1. Hillebrenner J., Wagenpfeil S., Schuchardt R., Schelling M., Schneider K. T. Erste klinische Erfahrungen bei Erstgebärenden mit einem neuartigen Geburtstrainer Epi-no®. Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie. 2001;205(1):12–19. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-14552.
    1. Kok J., Tan K. H., Koh S., et al. Antenatal use of a novel vaginal birth training device by term primiparous women in Singapore. Singapore Medical Journal. 2004;45(7):318–323.
    1. Shek K. L., Dietz H. P. Intrapartum risk factors for levator trauma. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2010;117(12):1485–1492. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02704.x.
    1. Dietz H. P., Langer S., Kamisan Atan I., Shek K. L., Caudwell-Hall J., Guzman Rojas R. Does the EpiNo prevent pelvic floor trauma? A multicentre randomized control trial. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2014;33(6):853–855.
    1. Nicoll L. M., Skupski D. W. Venous air embolism after using a birth-training device. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2008;111(2):489–491. doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000275261.35198.d7.
    1. Nakamura M. U., Sass N., Júnior J. E., et al. Parturient perineal distensibility tolerance assessed by EPI-NO: an observational study. Einstein. 2014;12(1):22–26. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082014AO2944.
    1. Hofmeyr G. J., Bassin J. An inflatable birth canal dilator: a randomised pilot study. South African Medical Journal. 1991;80(4):198–199.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner