The analgesic efficacy of intravenous lidocaine infusion after laparoscopic fundoplication: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Gregory J Dale, Stephanie Phillips, Gregory L Falk, Gregory J Dale, Stephanie Phillips, Gregory L Falk

Abstract

This study aimed to determine if intravenous lidocaine infusion reduces postoperative pain intensity following laparoscopic fundoplication surgery and to also validate the safety of intravenous lidocaine at the dose tested. This was an equally randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single center trial. Adult patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication were recruited. The intervention group received 1 mg/kg intravenous lidocaine bolus prior to induction of anesthesia, then an intravenous infusion at 2 mg/kg/h for 24 hours. The primary outcome was pain, measured using a numeric rating scale for 30 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were nausea and vomiting, opioid requirements, adverse events, serum lidocaine concentration, and length of hospital stay. The study was terminated after an interim analysis of 24 patients showed evidence of futility. There was no difference in postoperative pain scores (lidocaine versus control, mean ± standard deviation) at rest (2.0 ± 2.7 vs 2.1 ± 2.4, P=0.286) or with movement (2.0 ± 2.6 vs 2.6 ± 2.7, P=0.487). Three adverse events occurred in the lidocaine group (25% of patients). Intravenous lidocaine did not provide clinically significant analgesia to patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication. The serum lidocaine concentration of patients who experienced adverse events were within the therapeutic range. This trial cannot confirm the safety of intravenous lidocaine at the dose tested.

Keywords: analgesia; intravenous infusions; local anesthetics; pharmacokinetics.

Conflict of interest statement

GJD received research scholarships from the University of Sydney for his involvement in the project. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The CONSORT methods diagram showing participant flow. Abbreviation: CONSORT, consolidated standards of reporting trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box and whisker plot of pain scores at rest for lidocaine (blue) and control groups (green) at 6-hour intervals for 30 hours following laparoscopic fundoplication. Notes: ○, outlier; ⋆, extreme outlier. Pain was assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS-11). No significant difference between groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Box and whisker plot of pain scores with movement for lidocaine (blue) and control groups (green) at 6-hour intervals for 30 hours following laparoscopic fundoplication. Notes: ○, outlier; ⋆, extreme outlier. Pain was assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS-11). No significant difference between groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Serum concentration-time profile of lidocaine for each of the 12 patients receiving an intravenous lidocaine infusion (1 mg/kg loading dose, then 2 mg/kg/h for 24 hours). Note: Different colored lines represent each of the 12 patients.

References

    1. Iqbal A, Kakarlapudi GV, Awad ZT, et al. Assessment of diaphragmatic stressors as risk factors for symptomatic failure of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(1):12–21.
    1. Taniguchi T, Shibata K, Yamamoto K, Mizukoshi Y, Kobayashi T. Effects of lidocaine administration on hemodynamics and cytokine responses to endotoxemia in rabbits. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(3):755–759.
    1. Abram SE, Yaksh TL. Systemic lidocaine blocks nerve injury-induced hyperalgesia and nociceptor-driven spinal sensitization in the rat. Anesthesiology. 1994;80(2):383–391.
    1. Sun Y, Li T, Wang N, Yun Y, Gan TJ. Perioperative systemic lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(11):1183–1194.
    1. Mao J, Chen LL. Systemic lidocaine for neuropathic pain relief. Pain. 2000;87(1):7–17.
    1. Marret E, Rolin M, Beaussier M, Bonnet F. Meta-analysis of intravenous lidocaine and postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2008;95(11):1331–1338.
    1. Vigneault L, Turgeon AF, Cote D, et al. Perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain control: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58(1):22–37.
    1. McCarthy GC, Megalla SA, Habib AS. Impact of intravenous lidocaine infusion on postoperative analgesia and recovery from surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Drugs. 2010;70(9):1149–1163.
    1. Kranke P, Jokinen J, Pace NL, et al. Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;70(9):1149–1163.
    1. Breivik EK, Björnsson GA, Skovlund E. A comparison of Pain Rating Scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain. 2000;16(1):22–28.
    1. Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, et al. European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC) Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011;41(6):1073–1093.
    1. DeLoach LJ, Higgins MS, Caplan AB, et al. The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth Analg. 1998;86(1):102–106.
    1. Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, et al. Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain. 2000;88(3):287–294.
    1. Piantadosi S. Clinical Trials: A Methodologic Perspective. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2005.
    1. Proschan MA, Lan KG, Wittes JT. Statistical Monitoring of Clinical Trials: A Unified Approach. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2006.
    1. Groudine SB, Fisher HA, Kaufman Jr RP, Patel MK, Wilkins LJ, Mehta SA, Lumb PD. Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 1998;86(2):235–239.
    1. Bryson GL, Charapov I, Krolczyk G, Taljaard M, Reid D. Intravenous lidocaine does not reduce length of hospital stay following abdominal hysterectomy. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57(8):759–766.
    1. Martin F, Cherif K, Gentili ME, et al. Lack of impact of intravenous lidocaine on analgesia, functional recovery, and nociceptive pain threshold after total hip arthroplasty. Anesthesiology. 2008;109(1):118–123.
    1. Striebel HW, Klettke U. Is intravenous lidocaine infusion suitable for postoperative pain management? Schmerz. 1992;6(4):245–250.
    1. Insler SR, O’Connor M, Samonte AF, Bazaral MG. Lidocaine and the inhibition of postoperative pain in coronary artery bypass patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1995;9(5):541–546.
    1. Davison R, Parker M, Atkinson Jr AJ. Excessive serum lidocaine levels during maintenance infusions: Mechanisms and prevention. Am Heart J. 1982;104(2, Part 1):203–208.
    1. Collinsworth KA, Kalman SM, Harrison DC. The clinical pharmacology of lidocaine as an antiarrhythymic drug. Circulation. 1974;50(6):1217–1230.
    1. Burm A, Van Kleef J, Vermeulen N, Olthof G, Breimer DD, Spierdijk J. Pharmacokinetics of lidocaine and bupivacaine following subarachnoid administration in surgical patients: simultaneous investigation of absorption and disposition kinetics using stable isotopes. Anesthesiology. 1988;69(4):584–592.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner