Poractant alfa versus bovine lipid extract surfactant for infants 24+0 to 31+6 weeks gestational age: A randomized controlled trial

Brigitte Lemyre, Christoph Fusch, Georg M Schmölzer, Nicole Rouvinez Bouali, Deepti Reddy, Nicholas Barrowman, Nicole Huneault-Purney, Thierry Lacaze-Masmonteil, Brigitte Lemyre, Christoph Fusch, Georg M Schmölzer, Nicole Rouvinez Bouali, Deepti Reddy, Nicholas Barrowman, Nicole Huneault-Purney, Thierry Lacaze-Masmonteil

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of poractant alfa and bovine lipid extract surfactant in preterm infants.

Study design: Randomized, partially-blinded, multicenter trial. Infants <32 weeks needing surfactant before 48 hours were randomly assigned to receive poractant alfa or bovine lipid extract surfactant. The primary outcome was being alive and extubated at 48 hours post-randomization. Secondary outcomes included need for re-dosing, duration of respiratory support and oxygen, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, mortality and complications during administration.

Results: Three centers recruited 87 infants (mean 26.7 weeks and 906 grams) at a mean age of 5.9 hours, between March 2013 and December 2015. 21/42 (50%) were alive and extubated at 48 hours in the poractant alfa group vs 26/45 (57.8%) in the bovine lipid extract surfactant group; adjusted OR 0.76 (95% CI 0.30-1.93) (p = 0.56). No differences were observed in the need to re-dose. Duration of oxygen support (41.5 vs 62 days; adjusted OR 1.69 95% CI 1.02-2.80; p = 0.04) was reduced in infants who received poractant alfa. We observed a trend in bronchopulmonary dysplasia among survivors (51.5% vs 72.1%; adjusted OR 0.35 95%CI 0.12-1.04; p = 0.06) favoring poractant alfa. Twelve infants died before discharge, 9 in the poractant alfa group and 3 in the bovine lung extract group. Severe airway obstruction following administration was observed in 0 (poractant alfa) and 5 (bovine lipid extract surfactant) infants (adjusted OR 0.09 95%CI <0.01-1.27; p = 0.07).

Conclusion: No statistically significant difference was observed in the proportion of infants alive and extubated within 48h between the two study groups. Poractant alfa may be more beneficial and associated with fewer complications than bovine lipid extract surfactant. However, we observed a trend towards higher mortality in the poractant alfa group. Larger studies are needed to determine whether observed possible benefits translate in shorter hospital admissions, or other long term benefits and determine whether there is a difference in mortality.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Study flow.
Fig 1. Study flow.

References

    1. Seger N, Soll R. Animal derived surfactant extract for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (2): CD007836 10.1002/14651858.CD007836
    1. Rojas-Reyes MX, Morley CJ, Soll R. Prophylactic versus selective use of surfactant in preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (3): CD000510 10.1002/14651858.CD000510.pub2
    1. Soll R, Ozek E. Prophylactic protein free synthetic surfactant for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (1): CD001079 10.1002/14651858.CD001079.pub2
    1. Soll RF. Prophylactic natural surfactant extract for preventing morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): CD000511.
    1. Halliday HL. Surfactants: past, present and future. J Perinatol 2008; 28 Suppl 1: S47–S56.
    1. Lam BC, Ng YK, Wong KY. Randomized trial comparing two natural surfactants (Survanta vs. bLES) for treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Pulmonol 2005; 39 (1): 64–9. 10.1002/ppul.20125
    1. Tarawneh A, Kaczmarek J, Bottino MN, Sant'anna GM. Severe airway obstruction during surfactant administration using a standardized protocol: a prospective, observational study. J Perinatol 2011.
    1. Ramanathan R. Animal-derived surfactants: where are we? The evidence from randomized, controlled clinical trials. J Perinatol 2009; 29 Suppl 2: S38–S43.
    1. Ramanathan R, Rasmussen MR, Gerstmann DR, Finer N, Sekar K. A randomized, multicenter masked comparison trial of poractant alfa (Curosurf) versus beractant (Survanta) in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. Am J Perinatol 2004; 21 (3): 109–19. 10.1055/s-2004-823779
    1. Singh N, Hawley KL, Viswanathan K. Efficacy of Porcine Versus Bovine Surfactants for Preterm Newborns With Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2011; 128 (6): e1588–e1595. 10.1542/peds.2011-1395
    1. Downes JJ, Vidyasagar D, Boggs TR Jr., Morrow GM III. Respiratory distress syndrome of newborn infants. I. New clinical scoring system (RDS score) with acid—base and blood-gas correlations. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1970; 9 (6): 325–31.
    1. Jobe AH, Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163 (7): 1723–9. 10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.2011060
    1. Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD, Keating JP, Marshall R, Barton L, et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Ann Surg 1978; 187 (1): 1–7.
    1. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. J Pediatr 1978; 92 (4): 529–34.
    1. Speer CP, Gefeller O, Groneck P, Laufkotter E, Roll C, Hanssler L, et al. Randomised clinical trial of two treatment regimens of natural surfactant preparations in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1995; 72 (1): F8–13.
    1. Baroutis G, Kaleyias J, Liarou T, Papathoma E, Hatzistamatiou Z, Costalos C. Comparison of three treatment regimens of natural surfactant preparations in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Eur J Pediatr 2003; 162 (7–8): 476–80. 10.1007/s00431-002-1144-0
    1. Fujii AM, Patel SM, Allen R, Doros G, Guo CY, Testa S. Poractant alfa and beractant treatment of very premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Perinatol 2010; 30 (10): 665–70. 10.1038/jp.2010.20
    1. Sinha SK, Lacaze-Masmonteil T, Soler A, Wiswell TE, Gadzinowski J, Hajdu J, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of lucinactant versus poractant alfa among very premature infants at high risk for respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics 2005; 115 (4): 1030–8. 10.1542/peds.2004-2231
    1. Ainsworth SB, Beresford MW, Milligan DW, Shaw NJ, Matthews JN, Fenton AC, et al. Pumactant and poractant alfa for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in neonates born at 25–29 weeks' gestation: a randomised trial. Lancet 2000; 355 (9213): 1387–92.
    1. Enhorning G, Shennan A, Possmayer F, Dunn M, Chen CP, Milligan J. Prevention of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome by tracheal instillation of surfactant: a randomized clinical trial. Pediatrics 1985; 76 (2): 145–53.
    1. Dunn MS, Shennan AT, Zayack D, Possmayer F. Bovine surfactant replacement therapy in neonates of less than 30 weeks' gestation: a randomized controlled trial of prophylaxis versus treatment. Pediatrics 1991; 87 (3): 377–86.
    1. Peliowski A. A Randomized, blinded, Canadian multi-center trial, to compare a bovine surfactant, bLES (R) (b), with a synthetic Exosurf (E) for the rescue treatment of RDS in premature newborns < or = 1250g. Pediatr Research 43(4). 1998. Ref Type: Generic
    1. Hentschel R, Brune T, Franke N, Harms E, Jorch G. Sequential changes in compliance and resistance after bolus administration or slow infusion of surfactant in preterm infants. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28 (5): 622–8. 10.1007/s00134-002-1277-7
    1. Segerer H, van GW, Angenent FW, van Woerkens LJ, Curstedt T, Obladen M, et al. Pulmonary distribution and efficacy of exogenous surfactant in lung-lavaged rabbits are influenced by the instillation technique. Pediatr Res 1993; 34 (4): 490–4. 10.1203/00006450-199310000-00021

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner