Decrease in tumor content assessed in biopsies is associated with improved treatment outcome response to pembrolizumab in patients with rare tumors

Coya Tapia, Phyu P Aung, Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri, Mingxuan Xu, Fengying Ouyang, Anas Alshawa, Joud Hajjar, Gopal Singh, Vincent Yang, Lilibeth Castillo, Hung Le, Ravi Murthy, Bettzy Stephen, Kenneth R Hess, Ignacio Wistuba, Aung Naing, Coya Tapia, Phyu P Aung, Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri, Mingxuan Xu, Fengying Ouyang, Anas Alshawa, Joud Hajjar, Gopal Singh, Vincent Yang, Lilibeth Castillo, Hung Le, Ravi Murthy, Bettzy Stephen, Kenneth R Hess, Ignacio Wistuba, Aung Naing

Abstract

Background: Decreased tumor content (TC) in resection specimens after neoadjuvant therapy is used to predict prognosis. We investigated whether TC assessed in biopsy specimens or the shift in TC from baseline to on-treatment can be used accordingly to predict response in patients with rare tumors who were treated with pembrolizumab.

Methods: A total of 57 tumors (represented by 173 baseline and 179 on-treatment biopsies) from 57 patients with rare tumors participating in an ongoing phase II clinical trial of pembrolizumab were evaluated. TC was estimated on H&E-stained slides and tumors were dichotomized into low and high TC according to a cut-off of 10%. Necrosis, proliferative fibrosis (PF) and normal tissue were assessed in on-treatment biopsies. TC at baseline and on-treatment, as well as the shift in TC from baseline to on-treatment, was correlated with clinical response defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

Results: A decrease in TC was seen in 14% (n=8); no change in TC was seen in 75% (n=43); and an increase in TC from baseline to on-treatment was seen in 11% (n=6). Objective response was significantly associated with decrease in TC from baseline to on-treatment (38%, 3/8) compared with no change/increase in TC (6%, 3/49) (p=0.031). Patients with a decrease in TC had a significantly increased time to progression (TTP) (75% probability) compared with patients with an increase (20% probability) or no change in TC (19% probability) (p=0.0042). Low TC was seen in 23% (13/57) of the tumors at baseline and in 26% (15/57) on-treatment. High TC was seen in 77% (44/57) of tumors at baseline and in 74% (42/57) on-treatment. No significant associations with response were seen for necrosis, PF or normal tissue in on-treatment biopsies.

Conclusion: Patients with a decrease in TC from baseline to on-treatment had a significant improvement in objective response and a longer TTP. Our data suggest that the shift in TC might be used to predict response to pembrolizumab in rare tumors. However, further investigations in larger cohorts are needed to determine the clinical value of TC, the shift in TC and the cut-off of 10% assessed in biopsies.

Trial registration number: NCT02721732.

Keywords: immunotherapy; translational medical research; tumor biomarkers.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Merck was the sponsor of the drug pembrolizumab. CT had salary support on this study.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of a patient with partial response and decrease in TC from baseline to on-treatment. Shown are overviews (A+C: ×2 magnification) and detail (B+D: ×20 magnification) of H&E-stained biopsy specimens. (A+B) Baseline biopsy specimen with ≥10% TC (category: high TC). (C+D) On-treatment biopsy specimen does not contain any tumor, but fibrosis and inflammatory cells are visible (category: low TC). TC, tumor content.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier plots for patients with low versus high TC at baseline and on-treatment. Kaplan-Meier plots showing time to progression for tumors with low TC (green) versus high TC (orange). (A) Only baseline biopsy specimens have been taken into account. (B) Only on-treatment biopsy specimens have been taken into account. TC, tumor content
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier plot showing probability estimates to remain progression-free for 6 months: Patients with decrease in TC from baseline to on-treatment (orange), increase in TC (green), and no change in TC (red).

References

    1. Parchment RE, Ferry-Galow K, Makhlouf HR, et al. . Suitability factors of core needle biopsies for pharmacodynamic (PD) studies. JCO 2017;35:2540 10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.2540
    1. Dowlati A, Haaga J, Remick SC, et al. . Sequential tumor biopsies in early phase clinical trials of anticancer agents for pharmacodynamic evaluation. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:2971–6.
    1. Chen P-L, Roh W, Reuben A, et al. . Analysis of immune signatures in longitudinal tumor samples yields insight into biomarkers of response and mechanisms of resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Cancer Discov 2016;6:827–37. 10.1158/-15-1545
    1. Becker K, Mueller JD, Schulmacher C, et al. . Histomorphology and grading of regression in gastric carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer 2003;98:1521–30. 10.1002/cncr.11660
    1. Ogston KN, Miller ID, Payne S, et al. . A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. Breast 2003;12:320–7. 10.1016/S0960-9776(03)00106-1
    1. Rejniak KA, Lloyd MC, Reed DR, et al. . Diagnostic assessment of osteosarcoma chemoresistance based on virtual clinical trials. Med Hypotheses 2015;85:348–54. 10.1016/j.mehy.2015.06.015
    1. Stein JE, Soni A, Danilova L, et al. . Major pathologic response on biopsy (MPRbx) in patients with advanced melanoma treated with anti-PD-1: evidence for an early, on-therapy biomarker of response. Ann Oncol 2019;30:589–96. 10.1093/annonc/mdz019
    1. Leidner R, Bell RB, Yound K, et al. . NIRT) in head and neck cancer: phase I/Ib study of combined PD-1/SBRT prior to surgical resection. Cancer Res 2019;79.
    1. Junker K, Langner K, Klinke F, et al. . Grading of tumor regression in non-small cell lung cancer : morphology and prognosis. Chest 2001;120:1584–91. 10.1378/chest.120.5.1584
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228–47. 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
    1. Escudier B. Combination therapy as first-line treatment in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1176–8. 10.1056/NEJMe1900887
    1. Horn L, Mansfield AS, Szczęsna A, et al. . First-Line atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2220–9. 10.1056/NEJMoa1809064
    1. Cottrell TR, Thompson ED, Forde PM, et al. . Pathologic features of response to neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 in resected non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a proposal for quantitative immune-related pathologic response criteria (irPRC). Ann Oncol 2018;29:1853–60. 10.1093/annonc/mdy218
    1. Zhu AX, Finn RS, Edeline J, et al. . Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib (KEYNOTE-224): a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018;19:940–52. 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30351-6
    1. Migden MR, Rischin D, Schmults CD, et al. . Pd-1 blockade with cemiplimab in advanced cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2018;379:341–51. 10.1056/NEJMoa1805131
    1. Fuchs CS, Doi T, Jang RW, et al. . Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: phase 2 clinical KEYNOTE-059 trial. JAMA Oncol 2018;4:e180013 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0013
    1. Rischin D, Harrington KJ, Greil R, et al. . Protocol-specified final analysis of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-048 trial of pembrolizumab (pembro) as first-line therapy for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (r/m HNSCC). JCO 2019;37:6000 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.6000
    1. Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandala M, et al. . Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1789–801. 10.1056/NEJMoa1802357
    1. Nghiem P, Bhatia S, Lipson EJ, et al. . Durable tumor regression and overall survival in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma receiving pembrolizumab as first-line therapy. J Clin Oncol 2019;37:693–702. 10.1200/JCO.18.01896
    1. Groisberg R, Hong DS, Behrang A, et al. . Characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced sarcoma enrolled in early phase immunotherapy trials. J Immunother Cancer 2017;5:100 10.1186/s40425-017-0301-y
    1. D’Angelo SP, Mahoney MR, Van Tine BA, et al. . Streicher H. a non-comparative multi-center randomized phase II study of nivolumab +/− ipilimumab for patients with metastatic sarcoma (alliance A091401). Lancet Oncol 2018;19:416–26.
    1. Thies S, Langer R. Tumor regression grading of gastrointestinal carcinomas after neoadjuvant treatment. Front Oncol 2013;3:1–7. 10.3389/fonc.2013.00262
    1. Koelzer VH, Rothschild SI, Zihler D, et al. . Systemic inflammation in a melanoma patient treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors—an autopsy study. j. immunotherapy cancer 2016;4:1–8. 10.1186/s40425-016-0117-1
    1. Amaria RN, Reddy SM, Tawbi HA, et al. . Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma. Nat Med 2018;24:1649–54. 10.1038/s41591-018-0197-1
    1. Katz SI, Hammer M, Bagley SJ, et al. . Radiologic pseudoprogression during anti-PD-1 therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2018;13:978–86. 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.04.010
    1. Ertl G, Frantz S. Healing after myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res 2005;66:22–32. 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.01.011
    1. Shah VI, Raju U, Chitale D, et al. . False-Negative core needle biopsies of the breast: an analysis of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings in 27 concecutive cases of missed breast cancer. Cancer 2003;97:1824–31. 10.1002/cncr.11278
    1. Gold SA, Hale GR, Bloom JB, et al. . Follow-Up of negative MRI-targeted prostate biopsies: when are we missing cancer? World J Urol 2019;37:235–41. 10.1007/s00345-018-2337-0

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner