Feasibility of a Home-Based Action Observation Training for Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: An Explorative Study

Elena Beani, Valentina Menici, Adriano Ferrari, Giovanni Cioni, Giuseppina Sgandurra, Elena Beani, Valentina Menici, Adriano Ferrari, Giovanni Cioni, Giuseppina Sgandurra

Abstract

Unilateral Cerebral Palsy (UCP), the most frequent form of Cerebral Palsy, usually affects more the upper limb (UL) than the lower limb. Rehabilitation programs are addressed to improve manual abilities and UL use. In recent years, Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has been introduced in rehabilitation to increase treatment opportunities for patients, and also in home-based intervention. Moreover, the discovery of the Mirror Neuron System allowed to insert a new paradigm of treatment that is the Action Observation Training (AOT). The aim of the present study was to investigate the feasibility of a new rehabilitative home-based approach, called Tele-UPCAT (Tele-monitored UPper Limb Children Action Observation Training), based on the principles of AOT, in a group of Italian children and adolescents with UCP. This investigation was to provide information about the possibility of introducing ICT in telerehabilitation field. Twenty-nine children aged 11.73 ± 3.65 years (range 6.00-18.75) with a diagnosis of UCP participated in the study. They carried out 15 days of training based on the AOT paradigm with Tele-UPCAT system while wearing Actigraphs on both wrists. The feasibility of both training and study design and procedures was assessed through nine criteria taken from existent literature and from a questionnaire designed and realized ad hoc for the purpose, based on standard items of usability and acceptability. All feasibility criteria were met: 80% of training sessions were completed in the planned time and no significant technical issues were found. From the questionnaire, total scores were all above 82.15%, while the four sections obtained the following scores: (i) customization of exercises 80.00%; (ii) acceptability at home, 77.50%; (iii) required effort 80.00%; and (iv) suitability of manual and software 95.00%. No differences were found for age and sex. Tele-UPCAT demonstrated to be feasible as a home-based AOT for children and adolescents with UCP. Trial registration NCT03094455.

Keywords: action-observation training; children; feasibility; home-based training; unilateral cerebral palsy; upper limb.

Copyright © 2020 Beani, Menici, Ferrari, Cioni and Sgandurra.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Tele-UPCAT system.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total answers of the two groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Answers of the section “Customization of the exercises” of the two groups.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Answers of the section “Acceptability of the Tele-UPCAT system at home in daily life” of the two groups.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Answers of the section “Required effort” of the two groups.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Answers of the section “Suitability of the Manual/Software” of the two groups.

References

    1. Cioni G, Sgandurra G, Muzzini S, Paolicelli PB, Ferrari A. Forms of hemiplegia. In: Cioni G, Ferrari A, editors. The Spastic Forms of Cerebral Palsy: A Guide to the Assessment of Adaptive Functions. Milano: Springer-Verlag; (2010). p. 331–56. 10.1007/978-88-470-1478-7_16
    1. Novak I, Morgan C, Adde L, Blackman J, Boyd RN, Brunstrom-Hernandez J, et al. . Early, accurate diagnosis and early intervention in cerebral palsy: advances in diagnosis and treatment. JAMA Pediatr. (2017) 171:897–907. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1689
    1. Sakzewski L, Ziviani J, Boyd RN. Efficacy of upper limb therapies for unilateral cerebral palsy: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. (2014) 133:e175–204. 10.1542/peds.2013-0675
    1. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, et al. . Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci. (2001) 13:400–4. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2001.01385.x
    1. Zhu MH, Wang J, Gu XD, Shi MF, Zeng M, Wang CY, et al. Effect of action observation therapy on daily activities and motor recovery in stroke patients. Int J Nurs Sci. (2015) 2:279–82. 10.1016/j.ijnss.2015.08.006
    1. Buccino G, Arisi D, Gough P, Aprile D, Ferri C, Serotti L, et al. . Improving upper limb motor functions through action observation treatment: a pilot study in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. (2012) 54:822–8. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04334.x
    1. Buccino G, Molinaro A, Ambrosi C, Arisi D, Mascaro L, Pinardi C, et al. Action observation treatment improves upper limb motor functions in children with cerebral palsy: a combined clinical and brain imaging study. Neural Plast. (2018) 11:2018 10.1155/2018/4843985
    1. Sgandurra G, Ferrari A, Cossu G, Guzzetta A, Fogassi L, Cioni G. Randomized trial of observation and execution of upper extremity actions versus action alone in children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Neurorehabil Neural Rep. (2013) 27:808–15. 10.1177/1545968313497101
    1. Kirkpatrick E, Pearse J, James P, Basu A. Effect of parent-delivered action observation therapy on upper limb function in unilateral cerebral palsy: a randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. (2016) 58:1049–56. 10.1111/dmcn.13109
    1. Buchignani B, Beani E, Iacono O, Sicola E, Perazza S, Bieber E, et al. . Action observation training for rehabilitation in brain injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol. (2019) 19:344. 10.1186/s12883-019-1533-x
    1. Novak I, Cusick A, owe K. A pilot study on the impact of occupational therapy home programming for young children with cerebral palsy. Am J Occup Ther. (2007) 61:463–8. 10.5014/ajot.61.4.463
    1. Brennan DM, Mawson S, Brownsell S. Telerehabilitation: enabling the remote delivery of healthcare, rehabilitation, and self management. Stud Health Technol Inform. (2009) 145:231–248. 10.3233/978-1-60750-018-6-231
    1. Peretti A, Amenta F, Tayebati SK, Nittari G, Mahdi SS. Telerehabilitation: review of the state-of-the-art and areas of application. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. (2017) 4:e7. 10.2196/rehab.7511
    1. Zampolini M, Todeschini E, Bernabeu Guitart M, Hermens H, Ilsbroukx S, Macellari V, et al. . Tele-rehabilitation: present and future. Ann Ist Super Sanita. (2008) 44:125–34.
    1. Galea MD. Telemedicine in rehabilitation. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. (2019) 30:473–83. 10.1016/j.pmr.2018.12.002
    1. Sgandurra G, Cecchi F, Beani E, Mannari I, Maselli M, Falotico FP, et al. . Tele-UPCAT: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial of a home-based tele-monitored UPper limb children action observation training for participants with unilateral cerebral palsy. BMJ Open. (2018) 8:e017819. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017819
    1. Cobos-Carbó A, Augustovski F. 2011. CONSORT. Declaration: updated guideline for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Med Clin. (2010) 137:213–5. 10.1016/j.medcli.2010.09.034
    1. Sgandurra G, Ferrari A, Cossu G, Guzzetta A, Biagi L, Tosetti M, et al. . (2011). Upper limb children action observation training (UP-CAT): a randomised controlled trial in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. BMC Neurol. 11:80. 10.1186/1471-2377-11-80
    1. Leon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. J Psychiatr Res. (2011) 45:626–9. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008
    1. Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, et al. . A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. (2010) 10:1. 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1
    1. Verhelst H, Vander Linden C, Vingerhoets G, Caeyenberghs K. How to train an Injured Brain? A pilot feasibility study of a home-based computerized cognitive training. Games Health J. (2017) 6:28–38. 10.1089/g4h.2016.0043
    1. Wixon D, Wilson C. The usability engineering framework for product design and evaluation. In: Helander MG, Landauer TK, Prabhu PV, editors. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction 2nd edn. New York, NY: North Holland; (1997). p.653–88. 10.1016/B978-044481862-1.50093-5
    1. Abran A, Khelifi A, Suryn W, Seffah A. Usability meanings and interpretations in ISO standards. Softw Qual J. (2003) 11:325 10.1023/A:1025869312943
    1. Jokela T, Iivari N, Matero J, Karukka M. The standard of user-centered design and the standard definition of usability: analyzing ISO 13407 against ISO 9241-11. CLIHC. (2003) 53–60. 10.1145/944519.944525
    1. Davis FD. A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1986). Avaialable online at: (accessed September 11, 2019).
    1. Dillon AP, Morris MG. User acceptance of new information technology: theories and models. Ann Rev Inform Sci Technol. (1996) 31:3–32.
    1. Gard G. Work motivating factors in rehabilitation: a brief review. Phys Ther Rev. (2001) 6:85–9. 10.1179/ptr.2001.6.2.85
    1. Sadeghi M, Barlow-Krelina E, Gibbons C, Shaikh KT, Fung WLA, Meschino WS, et al. . Feasibility of a computerized working memory training in individuals with Huntington disease. PLoS ONE. (2017) 12:e0176429. 10.1371/journal.pone.0176429
    1. Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A, Dettmers C, McNamara A, Binkofski F, et al. . Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke. Neuroimage. (2007) 36:T164–73. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.043
    1. Nuara A, Avanzini P, Rizzolatti G, Fabbri-Destro M. Efficacy of a home-based platform for child-to-child interaction on hand motor function in unilateral cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. (2019) 61:1314–22. 10.1111/dmcn.14262
    1. Schmeler MR, Schein RM, McCue M, Betz K. Telerehabilitation clinical and vocational applications for assistive technology: research, opportunities, and challenges. Int J Telerehabil. (2009) 4:59–72. 10.5195/IJT.2009.6014
    1. Sgandurra G, Beani E, Inguaggiato E, Lorentzen J, Nielsen JB, Cioni G. Effects on parental stress of early home-based caretoy intervention in low-risk preterm infants. Neural Plast. (2019) 22:7517351 10.1155/2019/7517351
    1. Sgherri G, Avola G, Beani E, Chisari C, Cioni G, Sgandurra G. Methods to assess Usability and Acceptability of technologies for home-based rehabilitation: a systematic review. Int J Emerg Technol. (2020) 10:434–43.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner