mHealth intervention to improve the continuum of maternal and perinatal care in rural Guatemala: a pragmatic, randomized controlled feasibility trial

Boris Martinez, Enma Coyote Ixen, Rachel Hall-Clifford, Michel Juarez, Ann C Miller, Aaron Francis, Camilo E Valderrama, Lisa Stroux, Gari D Clifford, Peter Rohloff, Boris Martinez, Enma Coyote Ixen, Rachel Hall-Clifford, Michel Juarez, Ann C Miller, Aaron Francis, Camilo E Valderrama, Lisa Stroux, Gari D Clifford, Peter Rohloff

Abstract

Background/objective: Guatemala's indigenous Maya population has one of the highest perinatal and maternal mortality rates in Latin America. In this population most births are delivered at home by traditional birth attendants (TBAs), who have limited support and linkages to public hospitals. The goal of this study was to characterize the detection of maternal and perinatal complications and rates of facility-level referral by TBAs, and to evaluate the impact of a mHealth decision support system on these rates.

Methods: A pragmatic one-year feasibility trial of an mHealth decisions support system was conducted in rural Maya communities in collaboration with TBAs. TBAs were individually randomized in an unblinded fashion to either early-access or later-access to the mHealth system. TBAs in the early-access arm used the mHealth system throughout the study. TBAs in the later-access arm provided usual care until crossing over uni-directionally to the mHealth system at the study midpoint. The primary study outcome was the monthly rate of referral to facility-level care, adjusted for birth volume.

Results: Forty-four TBAs were randomized, 23 to the early-access arm and 21 to the later-access arm. Outcomes were analyzed for 799 pregnancies (early-access 425, later-access 374). Monthly referral rates to facility-level care were significantly higher among the early-access arm (median 33 referrals per 100 births, IQR 22-58) compared to the later-access arm (median 20 per 100, IQR 0-30) (p = 0.03). At the study midpoint, the later-access arm began using the mHealth platform and its referral rates increased (median 34 referrals per 100 births, IQR 5-50) with no significant difference from the early-access arm (p = 0.58). Rates of complications were similar in both arms, except for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, which were significantly higher among TBAs in the early-access arm (RR 3.3, 95% CI 1.10-9.86).

Conclusions: Referral rates were higher when TBAs had access to the mHealth platform. The introduction of mHealth supportive technologies for TBAs is feasible and can improve detection of complications and timely referral to facility-care within challenging healthcare delivery contexts.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02348840 .

Keywords: Barriers to care; Guatemala; Indigenous; Lay midwives; Perinatal monitoring; Referral system; Resource-constrained healthcare; Traditional birth attendants; mHealth.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Maya Health Alliance (Protocol number WK-2015-001) and Emory University (Protocol number IRB00076231). Written informed consent to participate was obtained from traditional birth attendants and subjects involved in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

BM, ECI, MJ, and PR are current staff members at Maya Health Alliance, the partnering healthcare organization for this study in Guatemala; the authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A schematic view of the traditional birth attendant obstetric referral strategy. Figure outlines the emergency referral workflow between TBAs and supporting medical team and details the integration of the mHealth system into this workflow
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Example of decision support workflows for facilitating obstetric emergency referral. a Shows an example of workflow on the mHealth platform. In the left-most illustration, the TBA selects the appropriate visit type (prenatal, perinatal, postnatal). The TBA is then guided through a series of pictorial warning signs, with audio prompts as necessary. Checking a warning sign generates an emergency call and text-message to on-call team. b Shows the same pictorial partial workflow through warning signs for a typical perinatal visit for TBAs using the visit placard in the later-access arm (during the non-intervention period), where an emergency telephone number is provided. All images were adapted from existing public sector resources in Guatemala [33]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Intervention design. TBAs in the early-access arm used the mHealth platform (intervention) through the whole study duration, depicted as a cell phone device in this and related figures. TBAs in the later-access arm provided usual care during the first 7 months of the study (non-intervention period), assisted with a placard-based complication guide (depicted as a notebook sheet in this and related figures), and subsequently crossed into use of the mHealth platform (intervention period)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Study flow diagram. Enrollment, randomization, and follow-up

References

    1. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals. (2015). Accessed 10 Oct 2017.
    1. World Health Organization . Fact sheet #348. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Maternal mortality.
    1. World Health Organization . Maternal and perinatal health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
    1. The World Bank. Indicator: Maternal mortality ratio. (2015). Accessed 10 Oct 2017.
    1. The World Bank. Indicator: Mortality rate, under-5 (per 1,000 live births). (2016). Accessed 11 Oct 2017.
    1. Stollak I, Valdez M, Rivas K, Perry H. Casas Maternas in the rural highlands of Guatemala: a mixed-methods case study of the introduction and utilization of birthing facilities by an indigenous population. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4:114–131. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00266.
    1. Ministerio de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social . VI Encuesta Nacional de Salud Materno Infantil. Guatemala City: Ministerio de Salud Pública y Asistencia Social; 2015.
    1. Walsh LV. Beliefs and rituals in traditional birth attendant practice in Guatemala. J Transcult Nurs. 2006;17:148–154. doi: 10.1177/1043659605285412.
    1. Goldman N, Glei DA. Evaluation of midwifery care: results from a survey in rural Guatemala. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:685–700. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00065-5.
    1. Chary A, Díaz AK, Henderson B, Rohloff P. The changing role of indigenous lay midwives in Guatemala: new frameworks for analysis. Midwifery. 2013;29:852–858. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.08.011.
    1. Garces A, Mcclure EM, Hambidge KM, Krebs NF, Figueroa L, Aguilar ML, et al. Trends in perinatal deaths from 2010 to 2013 in the Guatemalan western highlands. Reprod Health. 2015;12(Suppl 2):S14. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-12-S2-S14.
    1. Homer CS, Friberg IK, Dias MA, ten Hoope-Bender P, Sandall J, Speciale AM, et al. The projected effect of scaling up midwifery. Lancet. 2014;384:1146–1157. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60790-X.
    1. Colaci D, Chaudhri S, Vasan A. mHealth interventions in low-income countries to address maternal health: a systematic review. Ann Glob Health. 2016;82:922–935. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2016.09.001.
    1. Munro ML, Lori JR, Boyd CJ, Andreatta P. Knowledge and skill retention of a mobile phone data collection protocol in rural Liberia. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014;59:176–183. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12155.
    1. Lori JR, Munro ML, Boyd CJ, Andreatta P. Cell phones to collect pregnancy data from remote areas in Liberia. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2012;44:294–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01451.x.
    1. Stroux L, Martinez B, Coyote Ixen E, King N, Hall-Clifford R, Rohloff P, et al. An mHealth monitoring system for traditional birth attendant-led antenatal risk assessment in rural Guatemala. J Med Eng Technol. 2016;40:356–371. doi: 10.1080/03091902.2016.1223196.
    1. Martinez B, Hall-Clifford R, Coyote E, Stroux L, Valderrama CE, Aaron C, et al. Agile development of a smartphone app for perinatal monitoring in a resource-constrained setting. J Health Inform Dev Ctries. 2017;11:e1–19. doi: 10.3855/jidc.7999.
    1. Leon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45:626–629. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008.
    1. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e323–e333. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X.
    1. Kassebaum NJ, Bertozzi-Villa A, Coggeshall MS, Shackelford KA, Steiner C, Heuton KR, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and causes of maternal mortality during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2014;384:980–1004. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60696-6.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
    1. Bauserman M, Lokangaka A, Thorsten V, Tshefu A, Goudar SS, Esamai F, et al. Risk factors for maternal death and trends in maternal mortality in low-and middle-income countries: a prospective longitudinal cohort analysis. Reprod Health. 2015;12(Suppl 2):S5. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-12-S2-S5.
    1. Garces A, McClure EM, Chomba E, Patel A, Pasha O, Tshefu A, et al. Home birth attendants in low income countries: who are they and what do they do? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-34.
    1. Milne F, Redman C, Walker J, Baker P, Bradley J, Cooper C, et al. The pre-eclampsia community guideline (PRECOG): how to screen for and detect onset of pre-eclampsia in the community. BMJ. 2005;330:576–580. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7491.576.
    1. Lassi ZS, Bhutta ZA. Community-based intervention packages for reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality and improving neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; Issue 3. Art. No.: CD007754. .
    1. ten Hoope-Bender P, de Bernis L, Campbell J, Downe S, Fauveau V, Fogstad H, et al. Improvement of maternal and newborn health through midwifery. Lancet. 2014;384:1226–1235. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60930-2.
    1. Tamrat T, Kachnowski S. Special delivery: an analysis of mHealth in maternal and newborn health programs and their outcomes around the world. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16:1092–1101. doi: 10.1007/s10995-011-0836-3.
    1. Mechael P, Batavia H, Kaonga N, Searle S, Kwan A, Goldberger A, et al. Barriers and gaps affecting mHealth in low and middle income countries: Policy white paper. 2010. . Accessed 18 Jan 2018.
    1. Clifford GD. E-health in low to middle income countries. J Med Eng Technol. 2016;40:336–341. doi: 10.1080/03091902.2016.1256081.
    1. Jokhio AH, Winter HR, Cheng KK. An intervention involving traditional birth attendants and perinatal and maternal mortality in Pakistan. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2091–2099. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa042830.
    1. Martínez-Fernández A, Lobos-Medina I, Díaz-Molina CA, Chen-Cruz MF, Prieto-Egido I. TulaSalud: an m-health system for maternal and infant mortality reduction in Guatemala. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21:283–291. doi: 10.1177/1357633X15575830.
    1. Austad K, Chary A, Martinez B, Juarez M, Juarez Martin Y, Coyote Ixen E, et al. Obstetric care navigation: a new approach to promote respectful maternity care and overcome barriers to safe motherhood. Reprod Health. 2017;14:148. doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0410-6.
    1. FARMAMUNDI, ASECSA, MSPAS, KOICA, UNFPA y OSAR. Más que una sanadora, Manual práctico de comadronas tradicionales para una maternidad sana. Guatemala. 2014.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner