Comparison of intravenous labetalol and bupivacaine scalp block on the hemodynamic and entropy changes following skull pin application: A randomized, open label clinical trial

Sidhesh Bharne, Prasanna Udupi Bidkar, Ashok Shankar Badhe, Satyen Parida, Andi Sadayandi Ramesh, Sidhesh Bharne, Prasanna Udupi Bidkar, Ashok Shankar Badhe, Satyen Parida, Andi Sadayandi Ramesh

Abstract

Background: The application of skull pins in neurosurgical procedures is a highly noxious stimulus that causes hemodynamic changes and a rise in spectral entropy levels. We designed a study to compare intravenous (IV) labetalol and bupivacaine scalp block in blunting these changes.

Patients and methods: Sixty-six patients undergoing elective neurosurgical procedures were randomized into two groups, L (labetalol) and B (bupivacaine) of 33 each. After a standard induction sequence using fentanyl, propofol and vecuronium, patients were intubated. Baseline hemodynamic parameters and entropy levels were noted. Five minutes before, application of the pins, group L patients received IV labetalol 0.25 mg/kg and group B patients received scalp block with 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. Following application of the pins, heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and response entropy (RE)/state entropy (SE) were noted at regular time points up to 5 min.

Results: The two groups were comparable with respect to their demographic characteristics. Baseline hemodynamic parameters and entropy levels were also similar. After pinning, the HR, SAP, DAP, MAP, and RE/SE all increased in both groups but were lower in the scalp block group patients. HR increased by 19.8% in group L and by 11% in group B. SAP increased by 11.9% in group L and remained unchanged in group B. DAP increased by 19.7% in group L and by 9.9% in group B, MAP increased by 15.6% in group L and 5% in group B (P < 0.05). No adverse effects were noted.

Conclusion: Scalp block with bupivacaine is more effective than IV labetalol in attenuating the rise in hemodynamic parameters and entropy changes following skull pin application.

Keywords: Entropy; labetalol; scalp block; skull pins.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT figure representing enrollment data
Figure 2
Figure 2
Changes in heart rate in two groups. *P<0.05
Figure 3
Figure 3
Changes in mean arterial pressure in two groups. *P<0.05
Figure 4
Figure 4
Response entropy changes in the two groups. *P<0.05
Figure 5
Figure 5
State entropy changes in two groups. *P<0.05

References

    1. Colley PS, Dunn R. Prevention of blood pressure response to skull-pin head holder by local anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1979;58:241–3.
    1. Bayer-Berger MM, Ravussin P, Fankhauser H, Freeman J. Effect of three pretreatment techniques on hemodynamic and CSFP responses to skull-pin head-holder application during thiopentone/isoflurane or propofol anesthesia. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1989;1:227–32.
    1. Matakas F, Von Waechter R, Knüpling R, Potolicchio SJ., Jr Increase in cerebral perfusion pressure by arterial hypertension in brain swelling. A mathematical model of the volume-pressure relationship. J Neurosurg. 1975;42:282–9.
    1. Palmer JD, Sparrow OC, Iannotti F. Postoperative hematoma: A 5-year survey and identification of avoidable risk factors. Neurosurgery. 1994;35:1061–4.
    1. Viertiö-Oja H, Maja V, Särkelä M, Talja P, Tenkanen N, Tolvanen-Laakso H, et al. Description of the entropy algorithm as applied in the datex-ohmeda S/5 entropy module. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48:154–61.
    1. Hans P, Giwer J, Brichant JF, Dewandre PY, Bonhomme V. Effect of an intubation dose of rocuronium on Spectral Entropy and Bispectral Index responses to laryngoscopy during propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2006;97:842–7.
    1. Bithal PK, Pandia MP, Chouhan RS, Sharma D, Bhagat H, Dash HH, et al. Hemodynamic and bispectral index changes following skull pin attachment with and without local anesthetic infiltration of the scalp. J Anesth. 2007;21:442–4.
    1. Arshad A, Shamim MS, Waqas M, Enam H, Enam SA. How effective is the local anesthetic infiltration of pin sites prior to application of head clamps: A prospective observational cohort study of hemodynamic response in patients undergoing elective craniotomy. Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4:93.
    1. Pinosky ML, Fishman RL, Reeves ST, Harvey SC, Patel S, Palesch Y, et al. The effect of bupivacaine skull block on the hemodynamic response to craniotomy. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:1256–61.
    1. Yildiz K, Bicer C, Aksu R, Dogru K, Madenoglu H, Boyaci A. A comparison of 1 minimum alveolar concentration desflurane and 1 minimum alveolar concentration isoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial lesions. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2011;72:49–59.
    1. Hans P, Brichant JF, Dewandre PY, Born JD, Lamy M. Effects of two calculated plasma sufentanil concentrations on the hemodynamic and bispectral index responses to Mayfield head holder application. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1999;11:81–5.
    1. Smith FJ, van der Merwe CJ, Becker PJ. Attenuation of the haemodynamic response to placement of the Mayfield skull pin head holder: Alfentanil versus scalp block. South Afr J Anaesth Analg. 2002;8:4–11.
    1. Jamali S, Archer D, Ravussin P, Bonnafous M, David P, Ecoffey C. The effect of skull-pin insertion on cerebrospinal fluid pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure: Influence of sufentanil and fentanyl. Anesth Analg. 1997;84:1292–6.
    1. Costello TG, Cormack JR. Clonidine premedication decreases hemodynamic responses to pin head-holder application during craniotomy. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:1001–4.
    1. Uyar AS, Yagmurdur H, Fidan Y, Topkaya C, Basar H. Dexmedetomidine attenuates the hemodynamic and neuroendocrinal responses to skull-pin head-holder application during craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2008;20:174–9.
    1. Doblar DD, Lim YC, Baykan N, Frenette L. A comparison of alfentanil, esmolol, lidocaine, and thiopental sodium on the hemodynamic response to insertion of headrest skull pins. J Clin Anesth. 1996;8:31–5.
    1. Misra S, Koshy T, Unnikrishnan KP, Suneel PR, Chatterjee N. Gabapentin premedication decreases the hemodynamic response to skull pin insertion in patients undergoing craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2011;23:110–7.
    1. Kawaguchi M, Takamatsu I, Masui K, Kazama T. Effect of landiolol on bispectral index and spectral entropy responses to tracheal intubation during propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:273–8.
    1. Yildiz K, Madenoglu H, Dogru K, Kotanoglu MS, Akin A, Boyaci A. The effects of intravenous fentanyl and intravenous fentanyl combined with bupivacaine infiltration on the hemodynamic response to skull pin insertion. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005;17:9–12.
    1. Levin R, Hesselvik JF, Kourtopoulos H, Vavruch L. Local anesthesia prevents hypertension following application of the Mayfield skull-pin head holder. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1989;33:277–9.
    1. Fischler M, Dubois C, Brodaty D, Schlumberger S, Melchior JC, Guilmet D, et al. Circulatory responses to thiopentone and tracheal intubation in patients with coronary artery disease. Effects of pretreatment with labetalol. Br J Anaesth. 1985;57:493–6.
    1. Paolo Martorano P, Falzetti G, Pelaia P. Bispectral index and spectral entropy in neuroanesthesia. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2006;18:205–10.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner