Can promoting awareness of fetal movements and focusing interventions reduce fetal mortality? A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (AFFIRM)

Alexander E P Heazell, Christopher J Weir, Sarah J E Stock, Catherine J Calderwood, Sarah Cunningham Burley, J Frederik Froen, Michael Geary, Alyson Hunter, Fionnuala M McAuliffe, Edile Murdoch, Aryelly Rodriguez, Mary Ross-Davie, Janet Scott, Sonia Whyte, Jane E Norman, Alexander E P Heazell, Christopher J Weir, Sarah J E Stock, Catherine J Calderwood, Sarah Cunningham Burley, J Frederik Froen, Michael Geary, Alyson Hunter, Fionnuala M McAuliffe, Edile Murdoch, Aryelly Rodriguez, Mary Ross-Davie, Janet Scott, Sonia Whyte, Jane E Norman

Abstract

Background: In 2013, the stillbirth rate in the UK was 4.2 per 1000 live births, ranking 24th out of 49 high-income countries, with an annual rate of reduction of only 1.4% per year. The majority of stillbirths occur in normally formed infants, with (retrospective) evidence of placental insufficiency the most common clinical finding. Maternal perception of reduced fetal movements (RFM) is associated with placental insufficiency and increased risk of subsequent stillbirth.This study will test the hypothesis that the introduction of a package of care to increase women's awareness of the need for prompt reporting of RFM and standardised management to identify fetal compromise with timely delivery in confirmed cases, will reduce the rate of stillbirth. Following the introduction of a similar intervention in Norway the odds of stillbirth fell by 30%, but the efficacy of this intervention (and possible adverse effects and implications for service delivery) has not been tested in a randomised trial.

Methods: We describe a stepped-wedge cluster trial design, in which participating hospitals in the UK and Ireland will be randomised to the timing of introduction of the care package. Outcomes (including the primary outcome of stillbirth) will be derived from detailed routinely collected maternity data, allowing us to robustly test our hypothesis. The degree of implementation of the intervention will be assessed in each site. A nested qualitative study will examine the acceptability of the intervention to women and healthcare providers and identify process issues including barriers to implementation.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the Scotland A Research Ethics Committee (Ref 13/SS/0001) and from Research and Development offices in participating maternity units. The study started in February 2014 and delivery of the intervention completed in December 2016. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated to local investigating sites to inform education and care of women presenting with RFM.

Trial registration number: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01777022.

Version: Protocol Version 4.2, 3 February 2017.

Keywords: fetal growth restriction; neonatal death; perinatal mortality; reduced fetal movements; stillbirth.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stepped-wedge design. The shaded areas (both light and dark) indicate periods in which the interventions are being implemented. The lighter areas indicate the ‘transition’ period during which data will not be collected for the control or intervention group. The order in which hospital groupings implement the interventions will be determined via randomisation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow chart for the management of women presenting with RFMs for sites implementing the AFFIRM study. AC, abdominal circumference; CTG, cardiotocography; DVP, deepest vertical pool; EFW, estimated fetal weight; FGR, fetal growth restriction; FM, fetal movement; IOL, induction of labour; LV, liquor volume; RCOG, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; RFM, reduced fetal movement; USS, ultrasound scan.

References

    1. Still-Birth. Definition Act Great Britain. Curr Law Statut Annot GB 1992:1.
    1. Flenady V, Wojcieszek AM, Middleton P, et al. . Stillbirths: recall to action in high-income countries. Lancet 2016;387:691–702. 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01020-X
    1. Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, et al. . Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2011;377:1331–40. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62233-7
    1. Manktelow BM, Smith LK, Seaton SE, et al. . Perinatal Mortality Surveillance Report - UK Perinatal Deaths for births from January to December 2014. Leicester: The Infant Mortality and Morbidity Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester., 2016.
    1. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Pattinson R, et al. . Lancet’s Stillbirths Series steering committee. Stillbirths: Where? When? Why? How to make the data count? Lancet 2011;377:1448–63. 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62187-3
    1. Flenady V, Middleton P, Smith GC, et al. . Stillbirths: the way forward in high-income countries. Lancet 2011;377:1703–17. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60064-0
    1. Heazell AE, Whitworth MK, Whitcombe J, et al. . Research priorities for stillbirth: process overview and results from UK Stillbirth Priority Setting Partnership. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:641–7. 10.1002/uog.15738
    1. Heazell AE, Frøen JF. Methods of fetal movement counting and the detection of fetal compromise. J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;28:147–54. 10.1080/01443610801912618
    1. Stacey T, Thompson JM, Mitchell EA, et al. . The Auckland Stillbirth study, a case-control study exploring modifiable risk factors for third trimester stillbirth: methods and rationale. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;51:3–8. 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01254.x
    1. Warland J, O’Brien LM, Heazell AE, et al. . STARS Consortium. An international internet survey of the experiences of 1,714 mothers with a late stillbirth: the STARS cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:172 10.1186/s12884-015-0602-4
    1. Warrander LK, Heazell AE. Identifying placental dysfunction in women with reduced fetal movements can be used to predict patients at increased risk of pregnancy complications. Med Hypotheses 2011;76:17–20. 10.1016/j.mehy.2010.08.020
    1. Vintzileos AM, Fleming AD, Scorza WE, et al. . Relationship between fetal biophysical activities and umbilical cord blood gas values. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:707–13. 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90314-H
    1. Warrander LK, Batra G, Bernatavicius G, et al. . Maternal perception of reduced fetal movements is associated with altered placental structure and function. PLoS One 2012;7:e34851 10.1371/journal.pone.0034851
    1. Winje BA, Roald B, Kristensen NP, et al. . Placental pathology in pregnancies with maternally perceived decreased fetal movement--a population-based nested case-cohort study. PLoS One 2012;7:e39259 10.1371/journal.pone.0039259
    1. Holm Tveit JV, Saastad E, Stray-Pedersen B, et al. . Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in women presenting with decreased fetal movements in late pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:1345–51. 10.3109/00016340903348375
    1. Ptacek I, Sebire NJ, Man JA, et al. . Systematic review of placental pathology reported in association with stillbirth. Placenta 2014;35:552–62. 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.05.011
    1. Healthcare Improvement Scotland. Scottish Perinatal and Infant Mortality and Morbidity Report 2010. Edinburgh: Healthcare Improvement Scotland; 2012.
    1. Gardosi J, Kady SM, McGeown P, et al. . Classification of stillbirth by relevant condition at death (ReCoDe): population based cohort study. BMJ 2005;331:1113–7. 10.1136/bmj.38629.587639.7C
    1. Saastad E, Winje BA, Stray Pedersen B, et al. . Fetal movement counting improved identification of fetal growth restriction and perinatal outcomes-a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial. PLoS One 2011;6:e28482 10.1371/journal.pone.0028482
    1. Mangesi L, Hofmeyr GJ, Smith V, et al. . Fetal movement counting for assessment of fetal wellbeing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;10:CD004909 10.1002/14651858.CD004909.pub3
    1. Grant A, Elbourne D, Valentin L, et al. . Routine formal fetal movement counting and risk of antepartum late death in normally formed singletons. Lancet 1989;2:345–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(89)90535-7
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Clinical Guideline 62 - Antenatal care: routine care for the health pregnant woman. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2008.
    1. Sergent F, Lefèvre A, Verspyck E, et al. . [Decreased fetal movements in the third trimester: what to do?]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2005;33:861–9. 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2005.07.041
    1. Frøen JF, Heazell AE, Tveit JV, et al. . Fetal movement assessment. Semin Perinatol 2008;32:243–6. 10.1053/j.semperi.2008.04.004
    1. Saastad E, Vangen S, Frøen JF. Suboptimal care in stillbirths - a retrospective audit study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86:444–50. 10.1080/00016340701207724
    1. Frøen JF, Arnestad M, Frey K, et al. . Risk factors for sudden intrauterine unexplained death: epidemiologic characteristics of singleton cases in Oslo, Norway, 1986-1995. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:694–702. 10.1067/mob.2001.110697
    1. Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy. 8th Annual Report, 1 January–31 December 1999. London: Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium, 2001.
    1. Draper ES, Kurinczuk JJ, Kenyon S. MBRRACE-UK. obo. MBRRACE-UK Perinatal Confidential Enquiry: Term, singleton, normally formed, antepartum stillbirth. Leicester: The Infant Mortality and Morbidty Studies, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, 2015.
    1. Linde A, Pettersson K, Rådestad I. Women’s Experiences of Fetal Movements before the Confirmation of Fetal Death--Contractions Misinterpreted as Fetal Movement. Birth 2015;42:189–94. 10.1111/birt.12151
    1. Preston S, Mahomed K, Chadha Y, et al. . Clinical practice guideline for the management of women who report decreased fetal movements. Brisbane: Australia and New Zealand Stillbirth Alliance, 2010.
    1. Royal College Of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of Reduced Fetal Movements. London: RCOG, 2011.
    1. Tveit JV, Saastad E, Stray-Pedersen B, et al. . Reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines - a clinical quality improvement. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009;9:32 10.1186/1471-2393-9-32
    1. Hofmeyr GJ, Novikova N. Management of reported decreased fetal movements for improving pregnancy outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;4:CD009148 10.1002/14651858.CD009148.pub2
    1. Frøen JF, Tveit JV, Saastad E, et al. . Management of decreased fetal movements. Semin Perinatol 2008;32:307–11. 10.1053/j.semperi.2008.04.015
    1. Dutton PJ, Warrander LK, Roberts SA, et al. . Predictors of poor perinatal outcome following maternal perception of reduced fetal movements--a prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2012;7:e39784 10.1371/journal.pone.0039784
    1. Royal College Of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Investigation And Management Of The Small-For-Gestational-Age Fetus. London: RCOG, 2013.
    1. Heazell AE, Green M, Wright C, et al. . Midwives’ and obstetricians’ knowledge and management of women presenting with decreased fetal movements. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008;87:331–9. 10.1080/00016340801902034
    1. Jokhan S, Whitworth MK, Jones F, et al. . Evaluation of the quality of guidelines for the management of reduced fetal movements in UK maternity units. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:54 10.1186/s12884-015-0484-5
    1. Tveit JVH, Saastad E, Stray-Pedersen B, et al. . Erratum to: reduction of late stillbirth with the introduction of fetal movement information and guidelines - a clinical quality improvement. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010;10:49 10.1186/1471-2393-10-49
    1. Winje BA, Wojcieszek AM, Gonzalez-Angulo LY, et al. . Interventions to enhance maternal awareness of decreased fetal movement: a systematic review. BJOG 2016;123:886–98. 10.1111/1471-0528.13802
    1. Saastad E, Tveit JV, Flenady V, et al. . Implementation of uniform information on fetal movement in a Norwegian population reduced delayed reporting of decreased fetal movement and stillbirths in primiparous women - a clinical quality improvement. BMC Res Notes 2010;3:2 10.1186/1756-0500-3-2
    1. Hussey MA, Hughes JP. Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials. Contemp Clin Trials 2007;28:182–91. 10.1016/j.cct.2006.05.007
    1. ESRI Health Research and Information Division. Perinatal Statistics Report 2009. 2011.
    1. Hemming K, Girling A. A menu-driven facility for power and detectable-difference calculations in stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials. The Stata Journal 2014;14:363–80.
    1. Tominey E. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and early child outcomes. Discussion Paper no. 828. London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, 2007.
    1. Rådestad I, Akselsson A, Georgsson S, et al. . Rationale, study protocol and the cluster randomization process in a controlled trial including 40,000 women investigating the effects of mindfetalness. Sex Reprod Healthc 2016;10:56–61. 10.1016/j.srhc.2016.10.004

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner