Trait anxiety and unplanned delivery mode enhance the risk for childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms in women with and without risk of preterm birth: A multi sample path analysis

Sarah Sommerlad, Karin Schermelleh-Engel, Valentina Lucia La Rosa, Frank Louwen, Silvia Oddo-Sommerfeld, Sarah Sommerlad, Karin Schermelleh-Engel, Valentina Lucia La Rosa, Frank Louwen, Silvia Oddo-Sommerfeld

Abstract

Childbirth-related post-traumatic stress disorder (CB-PTSD) occurs in 3-7% of all pregnancies and about 35% of women after preterm birth (PTB) meet the criteria for acute stress reaction. Known risk factors are trait anxiety and pain intensity, whereas planned delivery mode, medical support, and positive childbirth experience are protective factors. It has not yet been investigated whether the effects of anxiety and delivery mode are mediated by other factors, and whether a PTB-risk alters these relationships. 284 women were investigated antepartum and six weeks postpartum (risk-group with preterm birth (RG-PB) N = 95, risk-group with term birth (RG-TB) N = 99, and control group (CG) N = 90). CB-PTSD symptoms and anxiety were measured using standardized psychological questionnaires. Pain intensity, medical support, and childbirth experience were assessed by single items. Delivery modes were subdivided into planned vs. unplanned delivery modes. Group differences were examined using MANOVA. To examine direct and indirect effects on CB-PTSD symptoms, a multi-sample path analysis was performed. Rates of PTS were highest in the RG-PB = 11.58% (RG-TB = 7.01%, CG = 1.1%). MANOVA revealed higher values of CB-PTSD symptoms and pain intensity in RG-PB compared to RG-TB and CG. Women with planned delivery mode reported a more positive birth experience. Path modeling revealed a good model fit. Explained variance was highest in RG-PB (R2 = 44.7%). Direct enhancing effects of trait anxiety and indirect reducing effects of planned delivery mode on CB-PTSD symptoms were observed in all groups. In both risk groups, CB-PTSD symptoms were indirectly reduced via support by medical staff and positive childbirth experience, while trait anxiety indirectly enhanced CB-PTSD symptoms via pain intensity in the CG. Especially in the RG-PB, a positive birth experience serves as protective factor against CB-PTSD symptoms. Therefore, our data highlights the importance of involving patients in the decision process even under stressful birth conditions and the need for psychological support antepartum, mainly in patients with PTB-risk and anxious traits. Trial registration number: NCT01974531 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Flowchart of measurement time points…
Fig 1. Flowchart of measurement time points and sample sizes of all subgroups.
Fig 2. Percentage of women with planned…
Fig 2. Percentage of women with planned vs. unplanned delivery mode per subgroup.
Fig 3. Bar graphs for each of…
Fig 3. Bar graphs for each of the observed significant mean differences (CB-PTSD symptoms).
(A) CB-PTSD symptoms six weeks postpartum. RG-PB = risk-group with preterm birth; RG-TB = risk-group with term-birth; CG = control-group. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.
Fig 4. Bar graphs for each of…
Fig 4. Bar graphs for each of the observed significant mean differences (pain intensity).
(B) Subjective pain intensity. RG-PB = risk-group with preterm birth; RG-TB = risk-group with term-birth; CG = control-group. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.
Fig 5. Bar graphs for each of…
Fig 5. Bar graphs for each of the observed significant mean differences (subjective birth experience).
(C) Subjective birth experience. RG-PB = risk-group with preterm birth; RG-TB = risk-group with term-birth; CG = control-group. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.
Fig 6. Path model for prediction of…
Fig 6. Path model for prediction of CB-PTSD symptoms 6 weeks postpartum in the risk group with preterm birth (RG-PB).
Significant paths (p < .01) are represented by solid lines, non-significant paths by dashed lines.
Fig 7. Path model for prediction of…
Fig 7. Path model for prediction of CB-PTSD symptoms 6 weeks postpartum in the risk group with term birth (RG-TB).
Significant paths (p < .01) are represented by solid lines, non-significant paths by dashed lines.
Fig 8. Path model for prediction of…
Fig 8. Path model for prediction of CB-PTSD symptoms 6 weeks postpartum in the control group (CG).
Significant paths (p < .01) are represented by solid lines, non-significant paths by dashed lines.

References

    1. Ayers S, Bond R, Bertullies S, Wijma K. The aetiology of post-traumatic stress following childbirth: a meta-analysis and theoretical framework. Psychol Med. 2016;46: 1121–1134. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002706
    1. Anderson CA. The trauma of birth. Health Care Women Int. 2017;38: 999–1010. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2017.1363208
    1. de Graaff LF, Honig A, van Pampus MG, Stramrood CAI. Preventing post-traumatic stress disorder following childbirth and traumatic birth experiences: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97: 648–656. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13291
    1. Kästner R. Psychosomatische Geburtshilfe. In: Berberich H, Siedentopf F, editors. Psychosomatische Urologie und Gynäkologie. Munic, Basel: UTB Ernst Reinhardt; 2016. pp. 235–245.
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
    1. Grekin R, O’Hara MW. Prevalence and risk factors of postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014;34: 389–401. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.05.003
    1. Yildiz PD, Ayers S, Phillips L. The prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder in pregnancy and after birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2017;208: 634–645. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.10.009
    1. Delicate A, Ayers S, Easter A, McMullen S. The impact of childbirth-related post-traumatic stress on a couple’s relationship: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2018;36: 102–115. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2017.1397270
    1. MacKinnon AL, Houazene S, Robins S, Feeley N, Zelkowitz P. Maternal Attachment Style, Interpersonal Trauma History, and Childbirth-Related Post-traumatic Stress. Front Psychol. 2018;9: 2379. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02379
    1. Horsch A, Stuijfzand S. Intergenerational transfer of perinatal trauma-related consequences. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2019;37: 221–223. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2019.1629190
    1. Parfitt YM, Ayers S. The effect of post‐natal symptoms of post‐traumatic stress and depression on the couple’s relationship and parent–baby bond. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2009;27: 127–142.
    1. Harrison SE, Ayers S, Quigley MA, Stein A, Alderdice F. Prevalence and factors associated with postpartum posttraumatic stress in a population-based maternity survey in England. J Affect Disord. 2021;279: 749–756. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.102
    1. Haagen JF, Moerbeek M, Olde E, van der Hart O, Kleber RJ. PTSD after childbirth: A predictive ethological model for symptom development. J Affect Disord. 2015;185: 135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.06.049
    1. O’Donovan A, Alcorn KL, Patrick JC, Creedy DK, Dawe S, Devilly GJ. Predicting posttraumatic stress disorder after childbirth. Midwifery. 2014;30: 935–941. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.03.011
    1. Soet JE, Brack GA, DiIorio C. Prevalence and predictors of women’s experience of psychological trauma during childbirth. Birth. 2003;30: 36–46. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2003.00215.x
    1. van Son M, Verkerk G, van der Hart O, Komproe I, Pop V. Prenatal depression, mode of delivery and perinatal dissociation as predictors of postpartum posttraumatic stress: an empirical study. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2005;12: 297–312.
    1. Zaers S, Waschke M, Ehlert U. Depressive symptoms and symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder in women after childbirth. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;29: 61–71. doi: 10.1080/01674820701804324
    1. Carquillat P, Boulvain M, Guittier MJ. How does delivery method influence factors that contribute to women’s childbirth experiences? Midwifery. 2016;43: 21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.10.002
    1. Gurber S, Bielinski-Blattmann D, Lemola S, Jaussi C, von Wyl A, Surbek D, et al.. Maternal mental health in the first 3-week postpartum: the impact of caregiver support and the subjective experience of childbirth—a longitudinal path model. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;33: 176–184. doi: 10.3109/0167482X.2012.730584
    1. McKenzie-McHarg K, Ayers S, Ford E, Horsch A, Jomeen J, Sawyer A, et al.. Post-traumatic stress disorder following childbirth: an update of current issues and recommendations for future research. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2015;33: 219–237.
    1. De Schepper S, Vercauteren T, Tersago J, Jacquemyn Y, Raes F, Franck E. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder after childbirth and the influence of maternity team care during labour and birth: A cohort study. Midwifery. 2016;32: 87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2015.08.010
    1. Shlomi Polachek I, Dulitzky M, Margolis-Dorfman L, Simchen MJ. A simple model for prediction postpartum PTSD in high-risk pregnancies. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2016;19: 483–490. doi: 10.1007/s00737-015-0582-4
    1. Rijnders M, Baston H, Schonbeck Y, van der Pal K, Prins M, Green J, et al.. Perinatal factors related to negative or positive recall of birth experience in women 3 years postpartum in the Netherlands. Birth. 2008;35: 107–116. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00223.x
    1. Ford E, Ayers S. Support during birth interacts with prior trauma and birth intervention to predict postnatal post-traumatic stress symptoms. Psychol Health. 2011;26: 1553–1570. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2010.533770
    1. Dekel S, Ein-Dor T, Berman Z, Barsoumian IS, Agarwal S, Pitman RK. Delivery mode is associated with maternal mental health following childbirth. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2019;22: 817–824. doi: 10.1007/s00737-019-00968-2
    1. Rowlands IJ, Redshaw M. Mode of birth and women’s psychological and physical wellbeing in the postnatal period. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:138. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-138
    1. Handelzalts JE, Waldman Peyser A, Krissi H, Levy S, Wiznitzer A, Peled Y. Indications for Emergency Intervention, Mode of Delivery, and the Childbirth Experience. PloS one. 2017;12: e0169132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169132
    1. Langer M. Psychosomatik in der Geburtshilfe. In: Schneider H, Husslein P, Schneider KT, editors. Die Geburtshilfe. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2016. pp. 1115–1131.
    1. Soderquist J, Wijma K, Wijma B. Traumatic stress after childbirth: the role of obstetric variables. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;23: 31–39. doi: 10.3109/01674820209093413
    1. Henriksen L, Grimsrud E, Schei B, Lukasse M, Bidens Study G. Factors related to a negative birth experience—A mixed methods study. Midwifery. 2017;51: 33–39. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.05.004
    1. Wimmer-Puchinger B, Gutiérrez-Lobos K, Riecher-Rössler A. Irrsinnig weiblich—Psychische Krisen im Frauenleben. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2016.
    1. Junge-Hoffmeister J. Operante Verfahren. In: Wittchen HU, Hoyer J, editors. Klinische Psychologie & Psychotherapie. Springer-Lehrbuch. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. pp. 511–527.
    1. Shaw JG, Asch SM, Kimerling R, Frayne SM, Shaw KA, Phibbs CS. Posttraumatic stress disorder and risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124: 1111–1119. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000542
    1. Lefkowitz DS, Baxt C, Evans JR. Prevalence and correlates of posttraumatic stress and postpartum depression in parents of infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2010;17: 230–237. doi: 10.1007/s10880-010-9202-7
    1. Byatt N, Hicks-Courant K, Davidson A, Levesque R, Mick E, Allison J, Moore Simas TA. Depression and anxiety among high-risk obstetric inpatients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014;36: 644–649. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.07.011
    1. Laux L, Hock K, Bergner-Köther R, Hodapp V, Renner KH. Das State-Trait-Angst-Depressions-Inventar, STADI; Manual. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2013.
    1. Stadlmayr W, Cignacco E, Surbek D, Büchi S. Screening-Instrumente zur Erfassung von Befindlichkeitsstörungen nach der Geburt. Die Hebamme. 2009;22: 13–19.
    1. Maercker A, Schützwohl M. Erfassung von psychischen Belastungsfolgen: Die Impact of Event Skala-revidierte Version (IES-R). Diagnostica. 2016;44: 130–141.
    1. Blanca MJ, Alarcon R, Arnau J, Bono R, Bendayan R. Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option? Psicothema. 2017;29: 552–557. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.383
    1. Field AP. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics: and sex and drugs and rock ’n’ roll. 4th edition. Los Angeles: Sage; 2013.
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39: 175–191. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146
    1. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide (Version 7th edition). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 1998. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1998.59.647
    1. Lt Hu, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6: 1–55.
    1. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. Methods of Psychological Research. 2003;8: 23–74.
    1. Olde E, van der Hart O, Kleber R, van Son M. Posttraumatic stress following childbirth: a review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;26: 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.002
    1. Roberts BW, Luo J, Briley DA, Chow PI, Su R, Hill PL. A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychol Bull. 2017;143: 117–141. doi: 10.1037/bul0000088
    1. Diamantopoulos A, Sarstedt M, Fuchs C, Wilczynski P, Kaiser S. Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective. J Acad Mark Sci. 2012;40: 434–449.
    1. McCarthy S. Post-traumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (PDS). Occup Med (Lond). 2008;58: 379.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner