Torsional ultrasound modality for hard nucleus phacoemulsification cataract extraction

M Zeng, X Liu, Y Liu, Y Xia, L Luo, Z Yuan, Y Zeng, Y Liu, M Zeng, X Liu, Y Liu, Y Xia, L Luo, Z Yuan, Y Zeng, Y Liu

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of phacoemulsification using torsional modality with different parameter settings for hard nucleus cataract extraction.

Design: A prospective, randomised clinical study.

Methods: A clinical practice study conducted at the Cataract Service, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun-Yat-Sen University, and Guangzhou. One eye each from 198 consecutive patients with cataract density grade IV according to the Emery-Little system classification system, requiring phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation, was included. Eyes were randomly assigned to the Linear Torsional combined with Ultrasound power group (Linear Tor+US group, n = 66), 100% Fixed Torsional group (Fixed Tor group, n = 65) and conventional Ultrasound burst group (US group, n = 67). All surgeries were performed by a single experienced surgeon and outcomes evaluated by another surgeon masked to treatment. Intraoperative parameters were Ultrasound Time (UST), Cumulative Dissipated Energy (CDE) and surgical complications. Patients were examined on post-op days 1, 7 and 30. Postoperative outcomes were final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), average central and incisional corneal thickness and central endothelial cell counts.

Results: The mean UST was lower in the Fixed Tor group than in the US group and in the Lin US+Tor group (p<or=0.0001). The mean CDE was lower in the Lin Tor+US group and in the Fixed Tor group than in the US group (p<or=0.0001). Comparing with the two Tor group, the US group had a lower average BCVA on post-op 1, 7 (p<or=0.0001) and 30 (p>0.01), greater average central corneal and incisional thickness on days 1, 7 (p<or=0.0001) and 30 (p>0.01), and higher average corneal endothelial cell losses on day 7 and 30 days (p<or=0.0001).

Conclusions: Torsional combined with ultrasound power or high fixed torsional amplitude can yield more effective hard nucleus phacoemulsification than conventional ultrasound modality.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1. Central corneal thickness as measured…
Figure 1. Central corneal thickness as measured and shown by anterior segment imaging VISANTE optical coherence tomography before operation.
Figure 2. Central corneal thickness as measured…
Figure 2. Central corneal thickness as measured and shown by anterior segment imaging VISANTE optical coherence tomography 1 day after operation.
Figure 3. Peripheral corneal thickness as measured…
Figure 3. Peripheral corneal thickness as measured and shown by anterior segment imaging VISANTE OCT before operation.
Figure 4. Incisional corneal thickness as measured…
Figure 4. Incisional corneal thickness as measured and shown by Anterior Segment Imaging VISANTE OCT 1 day after operation.

References

    1. Gimbel HV, da Reitz Pereira C. Advances in phacoemulsification equipment. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2002;13:30–2
    1. Shah PA, Yoo S. Innovations in phacoemulsification technology. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2007;18:23–6
    1. Uhlmann S, Wiedemann P. Refractive lens exchange combined with pars plana vitrectomy to correct high myopia. Eye 2006;20:1399.
    1. Horgan N, Condon PI, Beatty S. Refractive lens exchange in high myopia: long term follow up. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:670–2
    1. Liu Y, Zeng M, Liu X, et al. Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: Randomized comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:287–92
    1. Liu YZ, Jiang YZ, Liu YH, et al. A preliminary report on bimanual microphacoemulsification. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi (Chinese J Opthalmol) 2004;40:302–5
    1. Miyata K, Nagamoto T, Maruoka S, et al. Efficacy and safety of the soft-shell technique in cases with a hard lens nucleus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:1546–50
    1. Zhao PS, Wong TY, Wong WL et al. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by Visante Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography with ultrasound pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:1047–9
    1. Dada T, Sihota R, Gadia R, et al. Comparison of anterir segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy for assessment of the anterior segment. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:837–40
    1. Domingues FG, Moraes HV, Jr, Yamane R. Comparative study of the density of corneal endothelial cells after phacoemulsification by the “divide and conquer” and “quick chop” techniques. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2005;68:109–15
    1. Xie LX, Yao Z, Huang YS, et al. Corneal endothelial damage and its repair after phacoemulsification. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi (Chinese J Opthalmol) 2004;40:90–3
    1. Vasavada AR, Raj SM, Lee YC. NeoSoniX ultrasound versus ultrasound alone for phacoemulsification: randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:2332–5
    1. Jiraskova N, Rozsival P. Phacoemulsification parameters: series 20000 Legacy Versus Legacy with AdvanTec software and NeoSoniX handpiece. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:144–8
    1. Sippel KC, Pineda RJ. Phacoemulsification and thermal wound injury. Semin Ophthalmol 2002;17:102–9
    1. Floyd MS, Valentine JR, Olson RJ. Fluidics and heat generation of Alcon Infiniti and Legacy, Bausch & Lomb Millennium, and advanced medical optics sovereign phacoemulsification systems. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:387–92
    1. Joo CK, Kim YH. Phacoemulsification with a bevel-down phaco tip: phaco-drill. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997;23:1149–52
    1. Davison JA. Performance comparison of the Alcon Legacy 20000 1.1 mm TurboSonics and 0.9 mm Aspiration Bypass System tips. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:1386–91
    1. Kim EK, Cristol SM, Geroski DH, et al. Corneal endothelial damage by air bubbles during phacoemulsification. Arch Ophthalmol 1997;115:81–8
    1. Milla E, Verges C, Cipres M. Corneal endothelium evaluation after phacoemulsification with continuous anterior chamber infusion. Cornea 2005;24:278–82
    1. Ventura AC, Wälti R, Böhnke M. Corneal thickness and endothelial density before and after cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:18–20
    1. Zetterstrom C, Laurell CG. Comparison of endothelial cell loss and phaco- emulsification energy during endocapsular phacoemulsification surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1995;21:55–8

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner