Is accurate and reliable blood loss estimation the 'crucial step' in early detection of postpartum haemorrhage: an integrative review of the literature

Angela Hancock, Andrew D Weeks, Dame Tina Lavender, Angela Hancock, Andrew D Weeks, Dame Tina Lavender

Abstract

Background: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality in low-income countries and severe maternal morbidity in many high-income countries. Poor outcomes following PPH are often attributed to delays in the recognition and treatment of PPH. Experts have suggested that improving the accuracy and reliability of blood loss estimation is the crucial step in preventing death and morbidity from PPH. However, there is little guidance on how this can be achieved. The aim of this integrative review was to evaluate the various methods of assessing maternal blood loss during childbirth.

Methods: A systematic, integrative review of published research studies was conducted. All types of studies were included if they developed, tested, or aimed to improve methods and skills in quantifying blood loss during childbirth, or explored experiences of those involved in the process.

Results: Thirty-six studies were included that evaluated the accuracy of visual estimation; tested methods to improve skills in measurement; examined their effect on PPH diagnosis and treatment, and / or explored additional factors associated with blood loss evaluation. The review found that health professionals were highly inaccurate at estimating blood loss as a volume. Training resulted in short term improvements in skills but these were not retained and did not improve clinical outcomes. Multi-faceted interventions changed some clinical practices but did not reduce the incidence of severe PPH or the timing of responses to excessive bleeding. Blood collection bags improved the accuracy of estimation but did not prevent delays or progression to severe PPH. Practitioners commonly used the nature and speed of blood flow, and the condition of the woman to indicate that the blood loss was abnormal.

Conclusions: Early diagnosis of PPH should improve maternal outcomes, but there is little evidence that this can be achieved through improving the accuracy of blood loss volume measurements. The diagnosis may rely on factors other than volume, such as speed of blood flow and nature of loss. A change in direction of future research is required to explore these in more detail.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screening and Inclusion Process

References

    1. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet. 2014;2:e323–e333.
    1. Knight M, Callaghan W, Berg C, Alexander S, Bouvier-Colle MH, Ford J, et al. Trends in postpartum hemorrhage in high resource countries: a review and recommendations from the International Postpartum Hemorrhage Collaborative Group. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:55–65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-55.
    1. CMACE Saving Mothers’ Lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer 2006–2008. BJOG. 2011;118:1–203.
    1. Lutomski JE, Byrne BM, Devane D, Greene RA. Increasing trends in atonic postpartum haemorrhage in Ireland: an 11-year population-based cohort study. BJOG. 2012;119:306–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03198.x.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) Recommendations on Prevention and Treatment of Postpartum Haemorrhage. Geneva: WHO; 2012.
    1. Carroli G, Cuesta C, Abalos E, Gulmezoglu AM. Epidemiology of postpartum haemorrhage: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;22:999–1012. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.08.004.
    1. Bonnar J. Massive obstetric haemorrhage. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14:1–18. doi: 10.1053/beog.1999.0060.
    1. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PFA. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006;367:1066–1074. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68397-9.
    1. Lewis G (Ed). The confidential enquiry into maternal and child health (CEMACH). Saving mothers’ lives: reviewing maternal deaths to make childhood safer: 2003–2005. The Seventh Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. CEMACH London; 2007.
    1. Driessen M, Bouvier-Colle MH, Dupont C, Khoshnood B, Rudigoz RC, Deneux-Tharaux C. Postpartum hemorrhage resulting from uterine atony after vaginal delivery: factors associated with severity. Obstetrics And Gynecology. 2011;117:21–31. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318202c845.
    1. Roston AB, Roston AL, Patel A: Blood loss: Accuracy of Visual Estimation. In A Comprehensive Textbook of Postpartum Hemorrhage. An essential Clinical Reference for Effective Management. 2nd edition. Edited by Arulkumaran S, Karoshi M, Keith LG, Lalonde AB, B-Lynch C. London, Sapiens Publishing: 2012:71–72.
    1. Larsson C, Saltvedt S, Wiklund I, Pahlen S, Andolf E. Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2006;85:1448–1452. doi: 10.1080/00016340600985032.
    1. Patel A, Goudar SS, Geller SE, Kodkany BS, Edlavitch SA, Wagh K, et al. Drape estimation vs. visual assessment for estimating postpartum hemorrhage. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006;93:220–224. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.02.014.
    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6:6. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
    1. Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52:546–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x.
    1. Cooper HM. Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews. Rev Educ Res. 1982;52:291–302. doi: 10.3102/00346543052002291.
    1. Walsh D, Downe S. Appraising the quality of qualitative research. Midwifery. 2006;22:108–119. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2005.05.004.
    1. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2011;155:529-36.
    1. Downe S, Finlayson K, Walsh D, Lavender T. Weighing up and balancing out: a meta‐synthesis of barriers to antenatal care for marginalised women in high‐income countries. BJOG. 2009;116:518–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02067.x.
    1. Cochrane Public Health Group: Data extraction and assessment template []. Accessed 25th April, 2013.
    1. Wilcox C, Hunt F, Owen AB, Charles A. The measurement of blood lost during cesarean section. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1959;14:534–535. doi: 10.1097/00006254-195908000-00017.
    1. Chua S, Ho LM, Vanaja K, Nordstrom L, Roy AC, Arulkumaran S. Validation of a laboratory method of measuring postpartum blood loss. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1998;46:31–33. doi: 10.1159/000009992.
    1. Newton M, Mosey LM, Egli GE, Gifford WB, Hull CT. Blood loss during and immediately after delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1961;17:9–17.
    1. Brant HA. Blood loss at caesarean section. BJOG. 1966;73:456–459. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1966.tb05188.x.
    1. Brant HA. Precise Estimation Of Postpartum Haemorrhage: Difficulties And Importance. BMJ. 1967;1:398–400. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5537.398.
    1. Duthie SJ, Ven D, Yung GL, Guang DZ, Chan SY, Ma HK. Discrepancy between laboratory determination and visual estimation of blood loss during normal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991;38:119–124. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(91)90188-Q.
    1. Duthie SJ, Ghosh A, Ng A, Ho PC. Intra‐operative blood loss during elective lower segment caesarean section. BJOG. 1992;99:364–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13749.x.
    1. Razvi K, Chua S, Arulkumaran S, Ratnam SS. A Comparison Between Visual Estimation and Laboratory Detennination of Blood Loss During the Third Stage of Labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;36:152–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1996.tb03273.x.
    1. Kavle JA, Khalfan SS, Stoltzfus RJ, Witter F, Tielsch JM, Caulfield LE. Measurement of blood loss at childbirth and postpartum. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006;95:24–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.06.010.
    1. Al Kadri HM, Al Anazi BK, Tamim HM. Visual estimation versus gravimetric measurement of postpartum blood loss: a prospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283:1207–1213. doi: 10.1007/s00404-010-1522-1.
    1. Stafford I, Dildy GA, Clark SL, Belfort MA. Visually estimated and calculated blood loss in vaginal and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(519):e1–519.e7.
    1. Gharoro EP, Enabudoso EJ. Relationship between visually estimated blood loss at delivery and postpartum change in haematocrit. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29:517–520. doi: 10.1080/01443610903003159.
    1. Wangwe PJ, Balandya B. Accuracy in diagnosis of postpartum haemorrhage using visual estimation of blood loss versus change in haematocrit in a tertiary teaching hospital in Tanzania. Tanzan J Health Res. 2012;14:1–9.
    1. Glover P. Blood loss at delivery: how accurate is your estimation? Australian Midwifery. 2003;16:21–24. doi: 10.1016/S1031-170X(03)80005-3.
    1. Dildy GA, Paine AR, George NC, Velasco C. Estimating blood loss: can teaching significantly improve visual estimation? Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:601–606. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000137873.07820.34.
    1. Bose P, Regan F, Paterson‐Brown S. Improving the accuracy of estimated blood loss at obstetric haemorrhage using clinical reconstructions. BJOG. 2006;113:919–924. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01018.x.
    1. Buckland SS, Homer CS. Estimating blood loss after birth: using simulated clinical examples. Women Birth. 2007;20:85–88. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2007.01.001.
    1. Toledo P, McCarthy RJ, Hewlett B, Fitzgerald P, Wong C. The Accuracy of Blood Loss Estimation After Simulated Vaginal Delivery. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:1736–1740. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000286233.48111.d8.
    1. Maslovitz S, Barkai G, Lessing JB, Ziv A, Many A. Improved accuracy of postpartum blood loss estimation as assessed by simulation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:929–934. doi: 10.1080/00016340802317794.
    1. Toledo P, McCarthy RJ, Burke CA, Goetz K, Wong CA, Grobman WA. The effect of live and web-based education on the accuracy of blood-loss estimation in simulated obstetric scenarios. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:400–e1.
    1. Yoong W, Karavolos S, Damodaram M, Madgwick K, Milestone N, Al-Habib A, et al. Observer accuracy and reproducibility of visual estimation of blood loss in obstetrics: how accurate and consistent are health-care professionals? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281:207–213. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1099-8.
    1. Toledo P, Eosakul ST, Goetz K, Wong CA, Grobman WA. Decay in blood loss estimation skills after Web-based didactic training. Simul Healthc. 2012;7:18–21. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318230604f.
    1. de Vaate bij A, Coleman R, Manneh H, Walraven G. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of trained traditional birth attendants in the Gambia in the prevention, recognition and management of postpartum haemorrhage. Midwifery. 2002;18:3–11. doi: 10.1054/midw.2001.0289.
    1. Sibley LM, Blum LS, Kalim N, Hruschka D, Edmonds JK, Koblinsky M. Women's Descriptions of Postpartum Health Problems: Preliminary Findings from Matlab, Bangladesh. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007;52:351–360. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2007.02.020.
    1. Matsuyama A, Moji K. Perception of Bleeding as a Danger Sign During Pregnancy, Delivery, and the Postpartum Period in Rural Nepal. Qual Health Res. 2008;18:196–208. doi: 10.1177/1049732307312390.
    1. Kalim N, Anwar I, Khan J, Blum LS, Moran AC, Botlero R, et al. Postpartum haemorrhage and eclampsia: differences in knowledge and care-seeking behaviour in two districts of Bangladesh. J Health Popul Nutr. 2009;27:156. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v27i2.3328.
    1. Jangsten E, Hellström AL, Berg M. Management of the third stage of labour—focus group discussions with Swedish midwives. Midwifery. 2010;26:609–614. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.12.004.
    1. Elmir R, Schmied V, Jackson D, Wilkes L. Between life and death: Women’s experiences of coming close to death, and surviving a severe postpartum haemorrhage and emergency hysterectomy. Midwifery. 2012;28:228–235. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.11.008.
    1. Mapp T, Hudson K. Feelings and fears during obstetric emergencies −1. British Journal of Midwifery. 2005;13:30–35. doi: 10.12968/bjom.2005.13.1.17319.
    1. Rizvi F, Mackey R, Barrett T, McKenna P, Geary M. Successful reduction of massive postpartum haemorrhage by use of guidelines and staff education. BJOG. 2004;111:495–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00103.x.
    1. Dupont C, Touzet S, Colin C, Deneux-Tharaux C, Rabilloud M, Clement HJ, et al. Incidence and management of postpartum haemorrhage following the dissemination of guidelines in a network of 16 maternity units in France. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009;18:320–327. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.02.017.
    1. Audureau E, Deneux‐Tharaux C, Lefevre P, Brucato S, Morello R, Dreyfus M, et al. Practices for prevention, diagnosis and management of postpartum haemorrhage: impact of a regional multifaceted intervention. BJOG. 2009;116:1325–1333. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02238.x.
    1. Deneux‐Tharaux C, Dupont C, Colin C, Rabilloud M, Touzet S, Lansac J, et al. Multifaceted intervention to decrease the rate of severe postpartum haemorrhage: the PITHAGORE6 cluster‐randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2010;117:1278–1287. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02648.x.
    1. Dupont C, Deneux-Tharaux C, Touzet S, Colin C, Bouvier-Colle MH, Lansac J, et al. Clinical audit: a useful tool for reducing severe postpartum haemorrhages? International J Qual Health Care. 2011;23:583–589. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr042.
    1. Zhang WH, Deneux-Tharaux C, Brocklehurst P, Juszczak E, Joslin M, Alexander S. Effect of a collector bag for measurement of postpartum blood loss after vaginal delivery: cluster randomised trial in 13 European countries. BMJ. 2010;340:c293. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c293.
    1. Tixier H, Boucard C, Ferdynus C, Douvier S, Sagot P. Interest of using an underbuttocks drape with collection pouch for early diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283:25–29. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1265-z.
    1. Toracco RJ. Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 2005;4:356–367. doi: 10.1177/1534484305278283.
    1. Ganong LH. Integrative reviews of nursing research. Res Nurs Health. 1987;10:1–11. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770100103.
    1. Schorn MN. Measurement of Blood Loss: Review of the Literature. Journal of Midwifery & Womens Health. 2010;55:20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.02.014.
    1. Pacagnella RC, Souza JP, Durocher J, Perel P, Blum J. A Systematic Review of the Relationship between Blood Loss and Clinical Signs. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057594.
    1. Nathan HL, El Ayadi A, Hezelgrave NL, Seed P, Butrick E, Miller S, et al. Shock index: an effective predictor of outcome in postpartum haemorrhage? BJOG. 2015;122(2):268–275. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13206.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner