Adaptation and reliability of the Readiness for Inter professional Learning Scale in a Danish student and health professional setting

Birgitte Nørgaard, Eva Draborg, Jan Sørensen, Birgitte Nørgaard, Eva Draborg, Jan Sørensen

Abstract

Background: Shared learning activities aim to enhance the collaborative skills of health students and professionals in relation to both colleagues and patients. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale is used to assess such skills. The aim of this study was to validate a Danish four-subscale version of the RIPLS in a sample of 370 health-care students and 200 health professionals.

Methods: The questionnaire was translated following a two-step process, including forward and backward translations, and a pilot test. A test of internal consistency and a test-retest of reliability were performed using a web-based questionnaire.

Results: The questionnaire was completed by 370 health care students and 200 health professionals (test) whereas the retest was completed by 203 health professionals. A full data set of first-time responses was generated from the 570 students and professionals at baseline (test). Good internal association was found between items in Positive Professional Identity (Q13-Q16), with factor loadings between 0.61 and 0.72. The confirmatory factor analyses revealed 11 items with factor loadings above 0.50, 18 below 0.50, and no items below 0.20. Weighted kappa values were between 0.20 and 0.40, 16 items with values between 0.40 and 0.60, and six items between 0.60 and 0.80; all showing p-values below 0.001.

Conclusion: Strong internal consistency was found for both populations. The Danish RIPLS proved a stable and reliable instrument for the Teamwork and Collaboration, Negative Professional Identity, and Positive Professional Identity subscales, while the Roles and Responsibility subscale showed some limitations. The reason behind these limitations is unclear.

References

    1. Parsell G, Bligh J. The development of a questionnaire to assess the readiness of health care students for interprofessional learning (RIPLS) Med Educ. 1999;33(2):95–100. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00298.x.
    1. McFadyen AK, et al. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale: a possible more stable sub-scale model for the original version of RIPLS. J Interprof Care. 2005;19(6):595–603. doi: 10.1080/13561820500430157.
    1. McFadyen AK, Maclaren WM, Webster VS. The Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS): an alternative remodelled sub-scale structure and its reliability. J Interprof Care. 2007;21(4):433–443. doi: 10.1080/13561820701352531.
    1. Reid R, et al. Validating the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) in the postgraduate context: are health care professionals ready for IPL? Med Educ. 2006;40(5):415–422. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02442.x.
    1. Lauffs M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Swedish version of Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) Med Educ. 2008;42(4):405–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03017.x.
    1. Tamura Y, et al. Cultural adatation and validating a japanese version of the readiness for interprofessional learning scale (RIPLS) Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2012;26:56–63. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2011.595848.
    1. El-Zubeir M, Rizk DE, Al-Khalil RK. Are senior UAE medical and nursing students ready for interprofessional learning? Validating the RIPL scale in a Middle Eastern context. J Interprof Care. 2006;20(6):619–632. doi: 10.1080/13561820600895952.
    1. Horsburgh M, Lamdin R, Williamson E. Multiprofessional learning: the attitudes of medical, nursing and pharmacy students to shared learning. Med Educ. 2001;35(9):876–883. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00959.x.
    1. Rose MA, et al. Attituddes of Students in Medicine, Nursing, Occupational, and Physical Therapy Toward Interprofessional Education. J Allied Health. 2009;38(4):196–200.
    1. Goelen G, et al. Measuring the effect of interprofessional problem-based learning on the attitudes of undergraduate health care students. Med Educ. 2006;40(6):555–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02478.x.
    1. McFadyen AK, et al. Interprofessional attitudes and perceptions: Results from a longitudinal controlled trial of pre-registration helath and social care students in Scotland. Jorunal of Interprofessional Care. 2010;24(5):549–564. doi: 10.3109/13561820903520369.
    1. Bradley P, Cooper S, Duncan F. A mixed-methods study of interprofessional learning of resuscitation skills. Med Educ. 2009;43(9):912–922. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03432.x.
    1. Curran VR, et al. A longitudinal study of the effect of an interprofessional education curriculum on student satisfaction and attitudes towards interprofessional teamwork and education. J Interprof Care. 2010;24(1):41–52. doi: 10.3109/13561820903011927.
    1. De Vet HCW, et al. Measurement in Medicine. Practical Guides to Biostatistics and Epidemiology. Vol. . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. pp. 1–338.
    1. McFadyen AK, et al. The readiness for Interprofessional learning Scale: A possible more stable sub-scale for the original version of RIPLS. Jorunal of Interprofessional Care. 2012;19(6):595–603. doi: 10.1080/13561820500430157.
    1. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. Vol. Third. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
    1. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310.
    1. Cooper H, Spencer-Dawe E, McLean E. Beginning the process of teamwork: Design, impementation and evaluation of an inter-professional education intervention for first year undergraduate students. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2005;19(5):492–508. doi: 10.1080/13561820500215160.
    1. McFadyen AK, Webster VS, Maclaren WM. The test-retest reliability of a revised version of the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) J Interprof Care. 2006;20(6):633–639. doi: 10.1080/13561820600991181.
    1. Terwee CB, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurements properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
    1. Looij-Jansen PM, De Wilde EJ. Comparison of Web-Based versus Paper-and-Pencil Self-Administered Questionnaire: Effects on Health Indicators in Dutch Adolescents. Health Serv Res. 2008;43(5):1708–1721. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00860.x.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner